Skip to main content
Log in

Structure of the zooplankton communities in the region of the Ob River’s estuarine frontal zone

  • Marine Biology
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

The studies were carried out on September 27–30, 2007, in the area of the Ob estuarine frontal zone and over the adjacent inner Kara Sea shelf. Based upon the latitudinal changes in the salinity, the 100 nautical mile wide estuarine frontal zone was marked out. The frontal zone was inhabited by a specific zooplankton community dominated by species that occurred outside the frontal zone in only minor amounts. The biomass of the mesozooplankton averaging 984 mg/m3 in the frontal zone exceeded by 1.5 and 6 times the corresponding values in the inner desalinated area of the estuary and the adjacent areas of the Kara Sea shelf. At the inner southern periphery of the frontal zone, at maximal latitudinal salinity gradients (>2 psu per mile), the maximal development of the mesoplankton with the mean biomass for the water column of 3.1 g/m3 (37 g/m2) and up to 5.8 g/m3 in the subpycnocline layer was observed. The latitudinal extension of the biomass in the maximum zone did not exceed 10 miles. More than 90% of the maximum was composed of herbivorous zooplankton with the strong domination of the copepod Limnocalanus macrurus. The daily consumption within the zooplankton maximum area was estimated at 820 mgC/m2 per day. This value exceeds by two orders of magnitude the local primary production. At that level of consumption, the available phytoplankton biomass was consumed by grazers in less than 8 hours (!). A zooplankton aggregation at the southern periphery of the estuarine front exists due to the advection of phytoplankton from the adjacent river zone. The aggregation forms a natural pelagic biofilter where new allochthonous organic matter delivered by the river flow is accumulated and high secondary production is formed on its basis. An anomalously high concentration of planktic predatory Parasagitta elegans with biomass of over 1 g/m3 (46% of the total zooplankton biomass) was associated with the outer northern periphery of the estuarine frontal zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. G. Arashkevich, M. V. Flint, A. B. Nikishina, et al., “Role of Zooplankton in Transformation of Organic Matter in the Ob Estuary and Shelf and Deep-Water Areas of the Kara Sea,” Okeanologiya 50(5), 823–836 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Burenkov, Yu. A. Gol’din, and M. D. Kravchishina, “Distribution of the Particulate Matter Concentration in the Kara Sea in September 2007 according to Onboard and Satellite Data,” Okeanologiya 50(5), 842–849 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. G. Bogorov, “Zooplankton Biomass in the Southern Part of the Kara Sea,” Problemy Arktiki, No. 1, 65–69 (1945).

  4. M. E. Vinogradov, I. N. Sukhanova, and M. V. Flint, “Ecosystems of Boundary Fronts of the Anticyclonic Gyre in the Southern Part of the Pacific Ocean,” in Tr. Zool. Inst. AN SSSR (Nauka, Leningrad, 1987), Vol. 172, pp. 83–106 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. E. Vinogradov, E. A. Shushkina, L. P. Lebedeva, et al., “Mesoplankton of the Eastern Part of the Kara Sea and Ob and Yenisei Estuaries,” Okeanologiya 34(5), 716–723 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. V. Galkin, N. V. Kucheruk, K. V. Minin, et al., “Macrobenthos of the Estuarine Zone of the Ob River and Adjacent Areas of the Kara Shelf,” Okeanologiya 50(5), 837–841 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. N. Gruzov and L. P. Alekseeva, “The Proportion of the Weight and Body Length in the Main Zooplankton Groups in the Equatorial Part of the Atlantic Ocean,” Tr. Atlant NIRO 37, 378–400 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. G. Zatsepin, P. O. Zav’yalov, V. V. Kremenetskii, et al., “Surface Desalinated Layer in the Kara Sea,” Okeanologiya 50(5), 698–708 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. S. Leshinskaya, “Zooplankton and Benthos for the Fish of Ob as a Food Resource of the Gulf,” Tr. Salekhard. Stats. Ural. Fil. AN SSSR 2, 1–75 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. P. Lisitsyn, “Marginal Filter of Oceans,” Okeanologiya 34(5), 735–747 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. R. Makarevich, Planktonic Algocenoses of Estuarine Ecosystems (Nauka, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Yu. Moiseenko, Regulation of the Run-Off of the Ob River: A Yearly Essay on Hydroenergetics (S.-Peterb. Gos. Politekh. Univ., St. Petersburg, 2004), 10 p. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. N. Sukhanova, M. V. Flint, S. A. Mosharov, and V. M. Sergeeva, “Structure of Phytoplanktonic Communities and Primary Production in the Ob River Estuary and Over Adjacent Kara Shelf,” Okeanologiya 50(5), 785–800 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. N. Fedorov, Physical Nature and Structure of Oceanic Fronts (Gidrometizdat, Leningrad, 1983), 296 p. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. V. Flint, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].

  16. M. V. Flint and I. N. Sukhanova, “Biological Production near the Eastern Continental Slope of the Bering Sea,” in Contemporary Problems of Oceanology (Nauka, Moscow, 2003), pp. 165–183 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. L. Chislenko, Nomograms for Determination of Weight of Aquatic Organisms by Size and Body Shape (Nauka, Leningrad, 1968), 106 p. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. V. Denisenko, E. Rachor, and S. G. Denisenko, Benthic Fauna of the Southern Kara Sea. Siberian River Run-Off in the Kara Sea, Ed. by R. Stain (Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 2003), pp. 213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Deubel, M. Engel, I. Fetzer, et al., The South Kara Sea Ecosystem: Phytoplankton, Zooplankton and Benthos Communities Influenced by River Run-Off. Siberian River Run-Off in the Kara Sea, Ed. by R. Stain (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), pp. 237–266.

  20. I. Fetzer, H. J. Hirche, and E. G. Kolosova, “The Influence of Freshwater Discharge on the Distribution of Zooplankton in the Southern Kara Sea,” Polar Biol. 25, 404–415 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. V. Flint, A. V. Drits, M. V. Emelianov, et al., “Significance of Oceanographic and Biological Processes in the Outer and Middle Shelf Domains, at the Shelf Break and Middle Fronts for Biological Productivity of the Pribilof Ecosystem, the Eastern Bering Sea. Oceanographic Conditions and Plankton Communities in the Coastal Zones and Coastal Fronts of the St. Paul and St. George Islands,” in Investigations of the Pribilof Marine Ecosystem (City of St. Paul, Alaska-Shirshov Inst. Oceanol., RAS, Moscow, 1996), 407 p.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. V. Flint, I. N. Sukhanova, A. I. Kopylov, et al., “Plankton Distribution Associated with Frontal Zones in the Vicinity of the Pribilof Islands,” Deep-Sea Res. II 49(26), 6069–6093 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. V. Flint and I. N. Sukhanova, “The Influence of the Coastal Fronts around the Pribiof Islands (Bering Sea) on the Distribution and Dynamics of Phytoplankton,” Oceanology 42(Suppl. 1), S63–S78 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. K. Futterer and E. M. Galimov, Siberian River Run-Off into the Kara Sea: Characterization, Quantification, Variability and Environmental Significance. Siberian River Run-Off in the Kara Sea, Ed. by R. Stain (Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 2003), pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. V. Gordeev, J. M. Martin, M. V. Sidirov, et al., “A Reassessment of the Eurasian River Input of Water, Sediment, Major Elements, and Nutrients to the Arctic Ocean,” Am. J. Sci., No. 296, 664–691 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. H. Harms and M. J. Karcher, “Modeling the Seasonal Variability of Circulation and Hydrography in the Kara Sea,” J. Geophys. Res. 104(C6), 13431–13448 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. H. J. Hirche, K. N. Kosobokova, and Gaye-Haake, et al. “Structure and Function of Contemporary Food Webs on Arctic Shelves: A Panaractic Comparison. The Pelagic Ecosystem of the Kara Sea-Communities and Components of Carbon Flow,” Prog. Oceanogr. 71, 288–313 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual, Ed. by R. Harris (Academic, London, 2000), 684 p.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. le Fevre, “Aspects of the Biology of Frontal Systems,” Advances in Marine Biology 23, 163–299 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yu. I. Sorokin and P. Yu. Sorokin, “Plankton and Primary Production in the Lena River Estuary and in the South-Eastern Laptev Sea,” Estuar. Coastal. Shelf Sci. 43, 399–418 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. M. Springer, C. P. McRoy, and M. V. Flint, “The Bering Sea Green Belt: Shelf Edge Processes and Ecosystem Production,” Fisheries Oceanogr. 5(3/4), 205–223 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Stein, “Circum Arctic River Discharge and Its Geological Record,” Int. J. Earth Sci. 89, 447–449 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Siberian River Run-Off in the Kara Sea, R. Stein, K. Fahl, D. K. Futter, et al., Eds., (Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, 2003), 488 p.

    Google Scholar 

  34. V. A. Volkov, O. M. Johannessen, V. E. Borodachev, et al., Polar Seas Oceanography: An Integrated Study of the Kara Sea (Springer, Berlin, 2002), 450 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Flint.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.V. Flint, T.N. Semenova, E.G. Arashkevich, I.N. Sukhanova, V.I. Gagarin, V.V. Kremenetskiy, M.A. Pivovarov, K.A. Soloviev, 2010, published in Okeanologiya, 2010, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 809–822.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flint, M.V., Semenova, T.N., Arashkevich, E.G. et al. Structure of the zooplankton communities in the region of the Ob River’s estuarine frontal zone. Oceanology 50, 766–779 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437010050139

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437010050139

Keywords

Navigation