Skip to main content
Log in

Direct numerical simulation of laminar–turbulent flow over a flat plate at hypersonic flow speeds

  • Published:
Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method for direct numerical simulation of a laminar–turbulent flow around bodies at hypersonic flow speeds is proposed. The simulation is performed by solving the full three-dimensional unsteady Navier–Stokes equations. The method of calculation is oriented to application of supercomputers and is based on implicit monotonic approximation schemes and a modified Newton–Raphson method for solving nonlinear difference equations. By this method, the development of three-dimensional perturbations in the boundary layer over a flat plate and in a near-wall flow in a compression corner is studied at the Mach numbers of the free-stream of M = 5.37. In addition to pulsation characteristic, distributions of the mean coefficients of the viscous flow in the transient section of the streamlined surface are obtained, which enables one to determine the beginning of the laminar–turbulent transition and estimate the characteristics of the turbulent flow in the boundary layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Fedorov, “Transition and stability of high-speed boundary layers,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 79–95 (2011).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. O. M. Belotserkovskii, Constructive Modeling of Structural Turbulence and Hydrodynamic Instabilities (World Scientific, Singapore, 2009).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Zhong and X. Wang, “Direct numerical simulation on the receptivity, instability, and transition of hypersonic boundary layers,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 527–561 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. I. V. Yegorov and O. L. Zaitsev, “An approach to the numerical solution of the bidimensional Navier–Stokes equations using the direct calculation method,” USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 31 (2), 80–89 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. V. Yegorov and D. V. Ivanov, “The use of fully implicit monotone schemes to model plane internal flows,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 36 (12), 1717–1730 (1996).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Sivasubramanian and H. F. Fasel, “Transition initiated by a localized disturbance in a hypersonic flat-plate boundary layer,” AIAA Paper, No. 2011-374 (2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. I. V. Egorov, A. V. Fedorov, and V. G. Soudakov, “Direct numerical simulation of disturbances generated by periodic suction-blowing in a hypersonic boundary layer,” Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 20 (1), 41–54 (2006).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. I. V. Egorov, A. V. Novikov, and A. V. Fedorov, “Numerical simulation of stabilization of the boundary layer on a surface with a porous coating in a supersonic separated flow,” J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 48 (2), 176–183 (2007).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. I. V. Egorov, A. V. Novikov, and A. V. Fedorov, “Numerical modeling of the disturbances of the separated flow in a rounded compression corner,” Fluid Dyn. 41 (4), 521–530 (2006).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. S. K. Godunov, “Difference method for computing discontinuous solutions of fluid dynamics equations,” Mat. Sb. 47 (3), 271–306 (1959).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. S. K. Godunov, A. V. Zabrodin, M. Ya. Ivanov, A. N. Kraiko, and G. P. Prokopov, Numerical Solution of Multidimensional Problems in Gas Dynamics (Nauka, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. L. Roe, “Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes,” J. Comput. Phys. 43, 357–372 (1981).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. C. W. Jiang, “Shu efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes,” J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202–228 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Kh. Karimov, “On certain iterative methods for solving nonlinear equations in Hilbert spaces,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 269 (5), 1038–1046 (1983).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Saad and M. H. Shultz, “GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving non symmetric linear systems,” SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7 (3), 856–869 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. I. Yu. Babaev, V. A. Bashkin, and I. V. Egorov, “Numerical solution of the Navier–Stokes equations using variational iteration methods,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 34 (11), 1455–1462 (1994).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. CFD General Notation System, http://cgns.org/ (April 28, 2015).

  18. S. Balay, J. Brown, K. Buschelman, W. D. Gropp, D. Kaushik, M. G. Knepley, L. C. McInnes, B. F. Smith, and H. Zhang, PETSc web page, http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc (September 20, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Novikov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © I.V. Egorov, A.V. Novikov, 2016, published in Zhurnal Vychislitel’noi Matematiki i Matematicheskoi Fiziki, 2016, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 1064–1081.

In memory of O.M. Belotserkovskii

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egorov, I.V., Novikov, A.V. Direct numerical simulation of laminar–turbulent flow over a flat plate at hypersonic flow speeds. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 56, 1048–1064 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542516060129

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542516060129

Keywords

Navigation