Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of two-dimensional variations in the context of the digital image complexity assessment

  • Theory and Methods of Information Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problems of evaluation of the digital (discrete) image complexity are studied. Known versions of 2D variations with reference to digital images and the possibility of their use for evaluation of the image complexity are considered. The image complexity is interpreted as some attribute, which reflects the number, dimensions, and visibility of image details. Changes of the variation values after various image transformations are analyzed. A modified assessment that is named the “object size index” is proposed. Theoretical conclusions are confirmed by experimental studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Trans. Image Proces. 13, 600–612 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Wang and A. C. Bovik, Modern Image Quality Assessment (Morgan & Claypool, New York, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Yu and S. Winkler, “Image complexity and spatial information,” in Proc. 5th Int. Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX 2013), Klagenfurt, Austria, July 3–5, 2013 (IEEE, New York, 2013). pp. 12–17.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. R. A. Peters and R. N. Strickland, “Image complexity metrics for automatic target recognizers,” in Proc. Automatic Target Recognizer System and Technology Conf., Silver Spring, MD, Oct. 30–31, 1990 (Naval Surface Warfare Center, 1990). pp. 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. N. Tikhonov and V. Ya. Arsenin, Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems (Nauka, Moscow, 1979; Wiley, New York, 1977).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi “Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 60, 259–268 (1992).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. O. P. Milyukova, Image as a Function with Limited Total Variation. Iconics. Digital Processing of Video Information (Nauka, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. R. Adams and J. A. Clarkson, “On definitions of bounded variation for functions of two variables”, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 36, 824 (1933).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. A. S. Kronrod, “On functions of two variables,” Usp. Math. Sci. 5, 24–134 (1950).[in Russian].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A. G. Vitushkin, On Multidimentional Variations (Gostekhizdat, Moscow, 1955) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. D. Ivanov, Variations of Sets and Functions (Nauka, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. P. A. Chochia and O. P. Milukova, “Two-Dimensional Variation and Image Decomposition,” Proc. SPIE, 3346, 329–339 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. P. Milukova and P. A. Chochia “On estimation of the image complexity by two-dimensional variations,” J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 58, 628–635 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. E. Varakin, Theory of Complex Signals (Sovetskoe Radio, Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. A. Kharkevich, Spectra and Analysis (Fizmatgiz, Moscow, 1962) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. G. Vitushkin, Estimation of the Complexity of the Tabulation Problem (FizMatLit, Moscow, 1959) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. N. Kolmogorov, “Three approaches to definition the “information quantity” concept,” Problemy Peredachi Inf. 1, 3–11 (1965).[in Russian].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. P. A. Chochia, “Two-scale image model,” in Image Coding and Processing (Nauka, Moscow, 1988). p. 69–87 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mathematical Encyclopedia (Sov. Entsiklopediya, Moscow, 1977–1982), Vols. 1–5 [in Russian].

  20. J. Pierpont, Lectures on the Theory of Functions of Real Variables (Dover Publications, New York, 1959). Vol. 1.

  21. R. Gonzalez and R. Woods, Digital Image Processing (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2008; Tekhnosfera, Moscow, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Chochia.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © P.A. Chochia, O.P. Milukova, 2015, published in Informatsionnye Protsessy, 2015, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 169–182.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chochia, P.A., Milukova, O.P. Comparison of two-dimensional variations in the context of the digital image complexity assessment. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 60, 1432–1440 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226915120049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226915120049

Keywords

Navigation