Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Specific features of the ecological functioning of urban soils in Moscow and Moscow oblast

  • Degradation, Rehabilitation, and Conservation of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban soils (constructozems) were studied in Moscow and several cities (Dubna, Pushchino, and Serebryanye Prudy) of Moscow oblast. The soil sampling from the upper 10-cm-thick layer was performed in the industrial, residential, and recreational functional zones of these cities. The biological (the carbon of the microbial biomass carbon, Cmic and the microbial (basal) respiration, BR) and chemical (pHwater and the contents of Corg, heavy metals, and NPK) indices were determined in the samples. The ratios of BR to Cmic (the microbial respiration quotient, qCO2) and of Cmic to Corg were calculated. The Cmic varied from 120 to 738 μg C/g soil; the BR, from 0.39 to 1.94 μg CO2-C/g soil per hour; the Corg, from 2.52 to 5.67%; the qCO2, from 1.24 to 5.28 μg CO2-C/mg Cmic/g soil per h; and the Cmic/Corg, from 0.40 to 1.55%. Reliable positive correlations were found between the Cmic and BR, the Cmic and Cmic/Corg, and the Cmic and Corg values (r = 0.75, 0.95, and 0.61, respectively), as well as between the BR and Cmic/Corg values (r = 0.68). The correlation between the Cmic/Corg and qCO2 values was negative (r = −0.70). The values of Cmic, BR, Corg, and Cmic/Corg were found to correlate with the ammonium nitrogen content. No correlative relationships were revealed between the determined indices and the climatic characteristics. The principal component analysis described 86% of the variances for all the experimental data and clearly subdivided the locations of the studied soil objects. The ANOVA showed that the variances of Cmic, Corg, and BR are controlled by the site location factor by 66, 63, and 35%, respectively. The specificity of the functioning of the anthropogenic soils as compared with their natural analogues was clearly demonstrated. As shown in this study, measurable biological indices might be applied to characterize the ecological, environmental-regulating, and productive functions of soils, including urban soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. D. Ananyeva, Microbiological Aspects of Self-Remediation and Sustainability of Soils (Nauka, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. I. Gerasimova, M. N. Stroganova, N. V. Mozharova, and T. V. Prokof’eva, Anthropogenic Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. A. Dmitriev, Mathematical Statistics in Soil Science (Izd. Mosk Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. V. Dobrovol’skii and A. A. Nikitin, Soil Functions in the Biosphere and Ecosystems (Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

  5. V. N. Kudeyarov, G. A. Zavarzin, S. A. Blagodatskii, et al., Fluxes and Pools of Carbon in Terrestrial Ecosystems of Russia (Nauka, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. N. Kurganova and V. O. Lopes de Gerenyu, “The Stock of Organic Carbon in Soils of the Russian Federation: Updated Estimation in Connection with Land Use Changes,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 426(1), 132–134 (2009) [Dokl. Akad. Nauk (Biol.) 426, 219–222 (2009)].

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. Larionova, I. V. Evdokimov, I. N. Kurganova, et al., “Contribution of Roots and Microorganisms to the CO2 Emission from the Gray Forest and Soddy-Podzolic Soils,” in Emission and Sink of Greenhouse Gases in Northern Eurasia (ONTI NTsBI, Pushchino, 2004), pp. 112–117 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. O. Lopes de Gerenyu, I. N. Kurganova, A. M. Ermolaev, and Ya. V. Kuzyakov, “Changes in the Pool of Organic Carbon upon Self-Restoration of Arable Chernozems,” Agrokhimiya, No. 5, 5–12 (2009).

  9. On the State of Natural Resources and the Environment of Moscow Oblast in 2006. Information, Ed. by A. S. Kachan, N. G. Rybal’skiim, E. D. Samotesova, and A. R. Barsov, (NIA-Priroda, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. V. Prokof’eva and M. N. Stroganova, Soils of Moscow (Soils in the Urban Environment: Their Specific Features and Their Ecological Significance), (GEOS, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. N. Stroganova, A. D. Myagkova, and T. V. Prokof’eva, “Urban Soils: Genesis, Classification, and Functions,” in Soil. City. Ecology (Moscow, 1997), pp. 15–85 [in Russian].

  12. M. N. Stroganova, A. D. Myagkova, and T. V. Prokof’eva, “The Role of Soils in Urban Ecosystems,” Pochvovedenie, No. 1, 96–101 (1997) [Eur. Soil Sci. 30(1), 82–86 (1997)].

  13. E. A. Susyan, N. D. Ananyeva, E. G. Gavrilenko, et al., “Microbial Biomass Carbon in the Profiles of Forest Soils of the Southern Taiga Zone),” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 1233–1240 (2009) [Eur. Soil Sci. 42 (10), 1148–1155 (2009)].

  14. A Report on Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Island Press, Washington DC, 2005).

  15. P. W. Abrahams, “Soils: Their Implications to Human Health,” Sci. Total. Environ. 291, 1–31 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. E. Allaire, C. D. L. Arrive, J. A. Lafond, et al., “Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Urban Turfgrass Areas,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 2, 529–532 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. N. D. Ananyeva, E. A. Susyan, O. V. Chernova, and S. Wirth, “Microbial Respiration Activities of Soils from Different Climatic Regions of European Russia,” Eur. J. Soil Biol. 44, 147–157 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. P. E. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “A Physiological Method for the Quantitative Measurement of Microbial Biomass in Soils,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 215 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T.-H. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “Application of Eco-Physiological Quotients QCO2 and QD on Microbial Biomass from Soils of Different Cropping Histories,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 251–255 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. H. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “Carbon Links Between Microbial Biomass and Soil Organic Matter,” in Perspectives in Microbial Ecology, (Slovene Society for Microbiology, Ljubljana, 1986), pp. 467–471.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T.-H. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “Rations of Microbial Biomass to Total Organic Carbon in Arable Soils,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 21(4), 471–479 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. T.-H. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “The Metabolic Quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a Specific Activity Parameter to Assess the Effect of Environmental Conditions, such as pH, on the Microbial Biomass of Forest Soils,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 393–395 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Bandaranayke, Y. L. Qian, W. J. Parton, et al., “Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon Changes in Turfgrass Systems Using the CENTURY Model,” Agron. J. 95, 558–563 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. W. E. H. Blum, “Functions of Soil for Society and Environment,” Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 4, 75–79 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. L. Brown, “Increasing the Utility of Urban Environmental Quality Information,” Landsc. Urban Plan. 65, 85–93 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O. Dilly and J.-C. Munch, “Ratios Between Estimates of Microbial Biomass Content and Microbial Activity in Soils,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 27, 374–379 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. B. Guo and R. M. Gifford, “Soil Carbon Stocks and Land Use Change: A Meta Analysis,” Global Change Biol. 8, 345–360 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Insam, T. C. Hutchinson, and H. H. Reber, “Effects of Heavy Metal Stress on the Metabolic Quotient of Soil Microflora,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 691–694 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. P. Kaye, R. L. McCulley, and I. C. Burkez, “Carbon Fluxes, Nitrogen Cycling, and Soil Microbial Communities in Adjacent Urban, Native and Agricultural Ecosystems,” Global Change Biol. 11, 575–587 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Leemans, “Valuation of Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services,” Open Universeteit Nederland, 54–77 (2007).

  31. M. Liao, X. Xiaomei, A. Ma, and Y. Peng, “Different Influences of Cadmium on Soil Microbial Activity and Structure with Chinese Cabbage Cultivated and Non-Cultivated,” J. Soil Sedim., 818–826 (2010).

  32. MEA-Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Island Press (Washington, DC, 2005).

  33. E. P. Odum, “Trends Expected in Stressed Ecosystems,” Bioscience 35, 419–422 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Papa, G. Bartoli, A. Pelligrino, and A. Fioretto, “Microbial Activities and Trace Element Content in an Urban Soil,” Environ. Monit. Assessment, 193–203 (2010).

  35. A. M. Polyanskiy, A. V. Golovchenko, L. M. Polyanskaya, and D. G. Zvyagintzev, “New Criteria for the Evaluation of Soil Bacteria Complexes,” Microbiology 71, 582–586 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. W. M. Post and K. C. Kwon, “Soil Carbon Sequestration and Land-Use Changes: Processes and Potential,” Global Change Biol. 6, 317–327 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. T. Randerson, F. S. Chapin, J. W. Harden, et al., “Net Ecosystem Production: a Comprehensive Measure of Net Carbon Accumulation by Ecosystems,” Ecol. Appl. 12(4), 937–947 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. K. Ritz, I. J. H. Black, C. D. Campbell, et al., “Selecting Biological Indicators for Monitoring Soils: A Framework for Balancing Scientific and Technical Opinion to Assist Policy Development,” Ecol. Indicat. 9, 1212–1221 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Svirejeva-Hopkins, H. J. Schellnhuber, and V. L. Pomaz, “Urbanized Territories as a Specific Component of the Global Carbon Cycle,” Ecol. Model. 173, 295–312 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. TEEB — The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature. A synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB (Progress Press, 2010).

  41. C. Trazar-Cepeda, C. Leiros, F. Gil-Sotres, and S. Seoane, Towards a Biochemical Quality Index for Soils: An Expression Relating Several Biological and Biochemical Properties,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 26, 100–106 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. B. Vrscaj, L. Poggio, and F. A. Marsan, “A Method for Soil Environmental Quality Evaluation for Management and Planning in Urban Areas,” Landsc. Urban Plan. 88, 81–94 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Z. Zhou, O. J. Sun, J. Huang, et al., “Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stores and Storage Potential as Affected by Land-Use in an Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China,” Biogeochemistry 82, 127–138 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Soil Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia

    V. I. Vasenev & O. A. Makarov

  2. Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems of Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Institutskaya 2, Pushchino, Moscow oblast, 142290, Russia

    N. D. Ananyeva

Authors
  1. V. I. Vasenev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. D. Ananyeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O. A. Makarov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. I. Vasenev.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.I. Vasenev, N.D. Ananyeva, O.A. Makarov, 2012, published in Pochvovedenie, 2012, No. 2, pp. 224–235.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vasenev, V.I., Ananyeva, N.D. & Makarov, O.A. Specific features of the ecological functioning of urban soils in Moscow and Moscow oblast. Eurasian Soil Sc. 45, 194–205 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229312020147

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229312020147

Keywords

Search

Navigation