Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological evaluation of artificial soils treated with phosphogypsum

  • Degradation, Rehabilitation, and Conservation Of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An attempt to set up ecologically acceptable concentrations of toxic components contained in phosphogypsum was made for soils of different land uses. For this purpose, an experimental ecological evaluation of a standard soil mixture (model artificial soil ISO 11268-1) treated with phosphogypsum was performed. Both positive and negative effects of the phosphogypsum components were found. Thus, a significant increase in the biomass of lawn grasses was observed in the model soil with the phosphogypsum content of less than 3.3%. In the soil containing more than 6.8% phosphogypsum, the concentrations of Sr and F exceeded the maximum permissible values and adversely affected the living organisms. According to the basic ecological norms, the allowable content of phosphogypsum should be ≤2.0% for the soils of specially protected natural areas; ≤6.8% for agricultural and urban soils; and ≤9.6% for the soils of forest, water management, and transport lands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. V. Verkhovtseva and G. A. Osipov, “Method of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in the study of microbial communities of the soils of agrocenoses,” Probl. Agrokhim. Ekolog., No. 2, 51–54 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. L. Vorobeichik, O. F. Sadykov, and M. G. Farafontov, Ecological Regulation of Technogenic Pollutants of Terrestrial Ecosystems (Local Level) (UIF “Nauka”, Yekaterinburg, 1994) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. V. Ivanitskii, P. V. Klassen, A. A. Novikov et al., Phosphogypsum and Its Application (Khimiya, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Koval’skii, Geochemical Ecology (Nauka, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. P. Levich, “Biotic concept of the environmental control,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 337(2), 280–282 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. N. Lyubimova and T. I. Borisochkina, The Impact of Potentially Hazardous Elements Contained in Phosphogypsum on the Environment (Pochv. inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva RASKhN, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. M. Lyashkevich, “High-strength construction materials based on gypsum and phosphogypsum,” Stroit. Mater., No. 11, 22–26 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Methods of Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Ed. by D. G. Zvyagintsev (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Methods of Experimental Mycology, Ed. by I. A. Dudka, S. P. Vassera, and I. A. Ellanskaya (Naukova dumka, Kiev, 1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Yu. Opekunov, Ecological Norms and the Environmental Impact Assessment (Izd. SPbGU, St. Petersburg, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. G. Platonov and M. Ya. Akhalaya, Dose Dependence of Postradiation Mortality. Calculation of Half-Lethal Dose LD50 by Probit-Analysis (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. M. Rashkovskii, O. V. Loshchinin, V. S. Chumakov, S. Yu. Grinberg, M. A. Stepanov, A Method of Chemical Amelioration of Solonetzic Chernozemic Soils (Rosagropromizdat, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Recommendations on the Application of Phosphogypsum to Reclaim Solonetzes (Pochv. inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva RASKhN, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

  14. V. A. Terekhova, “Soil Bioassay: Problems and Approaches,” Eur. Soil Sci. 44(2), 173–179 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. A. Terekhova, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. A. Terekhova, “Bioindication and Bbiotesting in the environmental control,” in The Use of Conservation of Natural Resources. Information Bulletin (Moscow, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. A. Terekhova, D. B. Domashnev, M. A. Kanis’kin, and A. V. Stepachev, “Ekotoxicological evaluation of the increased soil phosphorus according to the response of test systems at different stages of their development,” Probl. Agrokhim. Ekolog., No. 3, 21–26 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. S. Fomin and A. G. Fomin, Soil. Quality Control and Ecological Safety according to International Standards (Protektor, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. S. Yakovlev and M. V. Evdokimova, “Ecological standardization of soil and soil quality control,” Eur. Soil Sci. 44(5), 534–546 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Cairns, Jr., “Biological monitoring. Part I. Early warning systems,” Water Res., No. 14, 1179–1196 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. C. S. Carvalho and B. van Raij, “Calcium Sulphate, phosphogypsum and calcium carbonate in the amelioration of acid subsoils for root growth,” Plant Soil, No. 192, 37–48 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Elbaz-Poulicheta, C. Braungardt, E. Achterberg, N. Nicholas Morley, D. Cossa, J.-M. Beckers, P. Nomerange, A. Cruzado, M. Leblanc, “Metal biogeochemistry in the Tinto-Odiel Rivers (Southern Spain) and in the Gulf of Cadiz: a synthesis of the results of TOROS project,” Cont. Shelf Res., No. 21, 1961–1973 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. L. Free, J. S. Zhu, and M. B. Moudgil, “The effect of peo and organic sulfonates in enhancing phosphogypsum filtration,” Int. J. Miner. Process., No. 57, 25–42 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Persoone and N. Stepanova, et al., “Practical and user-friendly toxicity classification system with microbiotests for natural waters and wastewaters,” Environ. Toxicol., No. 18 (6), 395–402 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. M. Smadi, R. H. Haddad, and A. M. Akour, “Potential use of phosphogypsum in concrete,” Cement Concrete Res., No. 29, 1419–1425 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Tayibi, M. Choura, F. A. Lopez, F. J. Alguacil, A. Lopez-Delgado, “Environmental impact and management of phosphogypsum,” J. Environ. Manag., No. 90, 2377–2386 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Kaniskin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.S. Yakovlev, M.A. Kaniskin, V.A. Terekhova, 2013, published in Pochvovedenie, 2013, No. 6, pp. 737–743.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yakovlev, A.S., Kaniskin, M.A. & Terekhova, V.A. Ecological evaluation of artificial soils treated with phosphogypsum. Eurasian Soil Sc. 46, 697–703 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229313060124

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229313060124

Keywords

Navigation