The Alzheimer's Society, drug manufacturers, and public trust
BMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39309.704016.BD (Published 23 August 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:400- Iain Chalmers, coordinator
- James Lind Initiative, Oxford OX2 7LG
- ichalmers{at}jameslindlibrary.org
For about five years before he died, my father had Alzheimer's disease. When it was first diagnosed we asked him how he wished his condition to be described when other people asked us about his health. He chose “bewildered”; and, indeed, bewilderment characterised his slow decline over the next five years. By far the most important part of his care was the loving support he received from a carer, who helped our family to cope.
We briefly considered the possibility of drug treatment at one point. The particular drug that we looked at caused diarrhoea in some patients, and that was not going to be welcome in someone who was already incontinent of urine and faeces. But the main problem was that we couldn't interpret the outcome measures from research studies (often scales of some sort). Although sufficient to secure drug marketing licences they had little practical meaning in my father's bewildered life.
In a paper published in 2001 Julia Cream and Harry Cayton of the …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.