Skip to main content
Log in

Lognormal distribution in the digg online social network

  • Regular Article
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyse the number of votes, called the digg value, which measures the impact or popularity of submitted information in the Online Social Network Digg. Experiments over five years indicate that the digg value of a story on the first frontpage follows closely a lognormal distribution. While the law of proportionate effect explains lognormal behavior, the proportionality factor a in that law is assumed to have a constant mean, whereas experiments show that a decreases linearly with time. Our hypothesis, the probability that a user diggs (votes) on a story given that he observes a certain digg value m equals a×m, can explain observations, provided that the population of users that can digg on that story is close to a Gaussian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rob McGann, Internet Edges Out Family Time More Than TV Time (ClickZ.com, 2005)

  2. C. Nuttall and D. Gelles, Facebook becomes bigger hit than Google (Financial Times, 2010)

  3. G. Szabo, B.A. Huberman, Commun. ACM 53, 80 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto, Revi. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Lerman, A. Galstyan, Proceedings of the First Workshop on online Social Networks (WOSP '08) (ACM, New York, 2008), pp. 7–12

  6. S. Tang, N. Blenn, C. Doerr, P. Van Mieghem, to appear in IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

  7. E.L. Crow, K. Shimizu, Lognormal distributions, Theory and Applications (Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, 1988)

  8. E. Limpert, W.A. Stahel, M. Abbt, Bioscience 51, 341 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Shockley, Proceedings of the IRE 45, 279 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Radicchi, S. Fortunato, C. Castellano, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17268 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Wu, B.A. Huberman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17599 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Doerr, S. Tang, N. Blenn, P. Van Mieghem, Are Friends Overrated? A Study of the Social News Aggregator Digg.com (IFIP Networking, 2011)

  13. R.K. Pan, S. Sinha, New J. Phys. 12, 115004 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Van Mieghem. Performance Analysis of Communications Systems and Networks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2006)

  15. Deese, Kaufman, J. Exp. Psychol. 54, 180 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, 2nd edn. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971), Vol. 2

  17. P. Embrechts, M. Maejima, Zeitung für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete 68, 191 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Armate, Mathématiques et sciences humaines 129, 5 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Gibrat, Bulletin de la Statistique Générale de la France 19, 469 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Van Mieghem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Mieghem, P., Blenn, N. & Doerr, C. Lognormal distribution in the digg online social network. Eur. Phys. J. B 83, 251 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20124-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20124-0

Keywords

Navigation