Kathy Garvin-Doxas
Abstract
All learning environments are characterized by numerous communication and interaction practices, which lend themselves to an overall characterization of the climate as defensive or supportive. A case study of public communication and interaction in a large, research-intensive university's first year computer science courses illustrates a learning environment primarily characterized by elements and behaviors associated with a defensive communication climate. Descriptions of classroom interactions and behaviors illustrate what a defensive communication climate “looks like” in terms of behavior, based on extensive observational research. Interview data demonstrates that defensive communication practices can lead to attrition among women in the major and illustrates ways in which the communication climate that characterizes the major is experienced and interpreted by women in the courses. This data also links defensive communication behaviors with lower confidence among women toward their major --- results consistent with previous studies of the causes of attrition among women in other Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Classroom experiences and behaviors that reflect a more supportive communication climate will be discussed within the context of practices and interactions that professors can engage in to ensure that their courses lean toward a supportive rather than a defensive environment as a way of making computer science learning environments more inclusive.
- Barker, L. J., Garvin-Doxas, K. and Jackson, M. 2002. Defensive climate in the computer science classroom. In Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM Press, New York, 43--47. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Barker, L. J. and Garvin-Doxas, K. 2004. Making visible the behaviors that influence the learning environment: A qualitative exploration of computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education 14 (2004), 119--146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beyer, S., K., Rynes, J. Perrault, K.,Hay, and S. Haller 2003. Gender differences in computer science students. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Reno, NV). ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Button, G. and Sharrock, W. 1996. Project work: The organization of collaborative design and development in software engineering. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 5 (1996), 369--386. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burke, K. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action. University of California Press, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Cohoon, J. M. 2002. Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colbeck, C.L., Cabrera, A. F., and Terenzini, P.T. 2001. Learning professional confidence: Linking teaching practices, students' self-perceptions, and gender. Review of Higher Education 24, 2 (2001), 173--191.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Farenga, S. J., and Joyce, B. A. 1998. Science-related attitudes and science course selection: A study of highability boys and girls. Roeper Review 20, 4 (1998), 247--251.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fisher, A., J. Margolis, and F. Miller 1997. Undergraduate women in computer science: experience, motivation, and culture, ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium, pp. 106--110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gibb, J. R. 1961. Defensive communication. Journal of Communication (1961), 11-12, 141--148.Google Scholar
- Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Gurer, D. and Camp, T. 2002. An ACM-W literature review on women in computing, Inroads: ACM SIGCSE Journal, 34(2), pp. 121-127 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hackett, G. 1985. The role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology 32 (1985), 47--56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hall, R. and Sandler, B. 1982. The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Project on the Status and Education of Women. Association of American Colleges, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Lundeberg, M., Fox, P., and Puncochar, J. 1994. Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgements. Journal of Educational Psychology 86, 1 (1994), 114--121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Klawe, M. and Leveson, N. 1995. Women in computing: Where are we now? Communications of the ACM 38, 1 (1995), 29--44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. 2002. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. 1997. Geek mythology and attracting undergraduate women to computer science. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~gendergap/papers/wepan97.html.Google Scholar
- Margolis, J., Fisher, A., and Miller, F. The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate Computing. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~gendergap/papers/anatomyWSQ99.html.Google Scholar
- Noelle-Neumann, E. 1984. The Spiral of Silence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Pedersen-Gallegos, L., S. Laursen, E. Seymour, R. Donohue, R. Crane, T. Deantoni, R. Haenfler 2004. Attracting and retaining women in information technology programs: A comparative study of three programmatic approaches. Unpublished report on NSF grant #0090026.Google Scholar
- Reis, R. 2002. Tomorrow's professor listserv. Stanford University Learning Laboratory. National Communication Association, TP#400.Google Scholar
- Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO:Google Scholar
- Sax, L. J. 1995. Predicting gender and major-field differences in mathematical self-concept during college. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 1, 4 (1995), 291--307.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tannen, D. 1999. The display of (gendered) identities in talk at work. In Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse. M. Bucholtz et al. eds. Oxford University Press, 221--224.Google Scholar
- Teague, J. and Clarke, V. 1996. Improving gender equity in computing programmes: Some suggestions for Increasing female participation and retention rates. In Proceedings of the 1st Australasian Conference on Computer Science Education (University of Sydney, Australia). ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trent, J. S. (ed.) 2002. Included in Communication: Learning Climates that Cultivate Racial and Ethnic Diversity. American Association for Higher Education and National Communication Association.Google Scholar
- Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., and Jackson, D. 1967. Pragmatics of Human Communication, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
- Weston, T. J. and Barker, L. J. 2002. Student computing in higher education: A profile of student use, training, and proficiency. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 14,1 (2002), 107--127.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Communication in computer science classrooms: understanding defensive climates as a means of creating supportive behaviors
Recommendations
Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program
The proportion of computer science (CS) bachelor's degree recipients who are women has consistently been small and is declining. This study investigates factors that predict performance and persistence in an undergraduate CS program and explores why ...
Understanding the Exodus of Undergraduate Women from Computer Science Majors: A Two-Factor Model of Self-Esteem
TechMindSociety '18: Proceedings of the Technology, Mind, and SocietyRetaining women in computer science is key to maintaining diversity in the field and in subfields such as HCI. There is considerable evidence that women leave STEM majors more frequently than men, leaving behind low numbers of female graduates in ...
Risky electronic communication behaviors and cyberbullying victimization
The present study tested Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) as an explanation of electronic communication safe behavioral intentions and behaviors and cyberbullying victimization. We recruited 577 college students who completed a battery of surveys ...
Comments