skip to main content
article

Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 July 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Ocean bottom sensor nodes can be used for oceanographic data collection, pollution monitoring, offshore exploration and tactical surveillance applications. Moreover, Unmanned or Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (UUVs, AUVs), equipped with sensors, will find application in exploration of natural undersea resources and gathering of scientific data in collaborative monitoring missions. Underwater acoustic networking is the enabling technology for these applications. Underwater Networks consist of a variable number of sensors and vehicles that are deployed to perform collaborative monitoring tasks over a given area.In this paper, several fundamental key aspects of underwater acoustic communications are investigated. Different architectures for two-dimensional and three-dimensional underwater sensor networks are discussed, and the underwater channel is characterized. The main challenges for the development of efficient networking solutions posed by the underwater environment are detailed at all layers of the protocol stack. Furthermore, open research issues are discussed and possible solution approaches are outlined.

References

  1. {1} M. Stojanovic, "Acoustic (underwater) communications," in Encyclopedia of Telecommunications, J. G. Proakis, Ed. John Wiley and Sons, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. {2} J. Proakis, J. Rice, E. Sozer, and M. Stojanovic, "Shallow water acoustic networks," in Encyclopedia of Telecommunications, J. G. Proakis, Ed. John Wiley and Sons, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. {3} J. G. Proakis, E. M. Sozer, J. A. Rice, and M. Stojanovic, "Shallow water acoustic networks," IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 114-119, Nov. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. {4} L. Freitag and M. Stojanovic, "Acoustic communications for regional undersea observatories," in Proceedings of Oceanology International, London, U.K., mar 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. {5} I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, "Wireless sensor networks: A survey," Computer Networks (Elsevier) Journal, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 393-422, Mar. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. {6} J. Catipovic, "Performance limitations in underwater acoustic telemetry," IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 15, pp. 205-216, July 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. {7} M. Stojanovic, J. Catipovic, and J. Proakis, "Phase coherent digital communications for underwater acoustic channels," IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 100-111, Jan. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. {8} R. Jurdak, C. V. Lopes, and P. Baldi, "A survey, classification and comparative analysis of medium access control protocols for ad hoc networks," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 6, no. 1, First Quarter 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. {9} D. N. Kalofonos, M. Stojanovic, and J. G. Proakis, "Performance of adaptive MC-CDMA detectors in rapidly fading rayleigh channels," IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 229-239, Mar. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. {10} W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, "An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2002, vol. 3, New York, NY, USA, June, pp. 1567-1576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. {11} M. Abolhasan, T. Wysocki, and E. Dutkiewicz, "A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks," Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 2, pp. 1-22, Jan. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. {12} T. Melodia, D. Pompili, and I. F. Akyildiz, "Optimal local topology knowledge for energy efficient geographical routing in sensor networks," in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2004, Hong Kong S.A.R., PRC, March 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. {13} Y. Sankarasubramaniam, O. B. Akan, and I. F. Akyildiz, "ESRT: event-to-sink reliable transport for wireless sensor networks," in Proceedings of ACM MOBIHOC 2003, Annapolis, MD, USA, June, pp. 177-188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image ACM SIGBED Review
                  ACM SIGBED Review  Volume 1, Issue 2
                  Special issue on embedded sensor networks and wireless computing
                  July 2004
                  12 pages
                  EISSN:1551-3688
                  DOI:10.1145/1121776
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 2004 Authors

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 July 2004

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • article

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader