skip to main content
10.1145/1161089.1161103acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Localization in sparse networks using sweeps

Published:29 September 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Determining node positions is essential for many next-generation network functionalities. Previous localization algorithms lack correctness guarantees or require network density higher than required for unique localizability. In this paper, we describe a class of algorithms for fine-grained localization called Sweeps. Sweeps correctly finitely localizes all nodes in bilateration networks. Sweeps also handles angle measurements and noisy measurements. We demonstrate the practicality of our algorithm through extensive simulations on a large number of networks, upon which it consistently localizes one-thousand-node networks of average degree less than five in less than two minutes on a consumer PC.

References

  1. J. Albowicz, A. Chen, and L. Zhang. Recursive position estimation in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), pages 35--41, Riverside, CA, Nov. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Anderson, P. Belhumeur, T. Eren, D. Goldenberg, A. Morse, W. Whiteley, and Y. R. Yang. Global properties of easily localizable sensor networks. Preprint Australian National University, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Aspnes, T. Eren, D. K. Goldenberg, A. S. Morse, W. Whiteley, Y. R. Yang, B. D. O. Anderson, and P. N. Belhumeur. A theory of network localization. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Aspnes, D. Goldenberg, and Y. R. Yang. On the computational complexity of sensor network localization. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects of Wireless Sensor Networks, Turku, Finland, July 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Tel Aviv, Israel, Mar. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. B. Berger, J. Kleinberg, and T. Leighton. Reconstructing a three-dimensional model with arbitrary errors. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(2):212--235, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Biswas, T.-C. Liang, K.-C. Toh, T.-C. Wang, and Y. Ye. Semidefinite programming approaches to sensor network localization with noisy distance measurements. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. P. Biswas and Y. Ye. Semidefinite programming for ad hoc wireless sensor network localization. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'04), Berkeley, CA, Apr. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 7(5):28--34, Oct. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Capkun, M. Hamdi, and J.-P. Hubaux. GPS-free positioning in mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of HICSS, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Chintalapudi, R. Govindan, G. Sukhatme, and A. Dhariwal. Ad-hoc localization using ranging and sectoring. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, Apr. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Cortes and F. Bullo. Coordination and geometric optimization via distributed dynamical systems. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 44:1543--1574, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. Doherty, K. S. J. Pister, and L. E. Ghaoui. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, AK, Apr. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Eren, D. Goldenberg, W. Whiteley, Y. R. Yang, A. S. Morse, B. D. O. Anderson, and P. N. Belhumeur. Rigidity, computation, and randomization in network localization. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, Apr. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Fang, M. Cao, A. S. Morse, and B. D. O. Anderson. Localization of sensor networks using Sweeps. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, Dec. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Fang, M. Cao, A. S. Morse, and B. D. O. Anderson. Sequential localization of networks. In Proceedings of Seventeenth International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, Kyoto, Japan, July 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Goldenberg, A. Krishnamurthy, W. Maness, Y. R. Yang, A. Young, A. S. Morse, A. Savvides, and B. D. O. Anderson. Network localization in partially localizable networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Miami, FL, Apr. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Haeberlen, E. Flannery, A. Ladd, A. Rudys, D. Wallach, and L. Kavraki. Practical robust localization over large-scale 802.11 wireless networks. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom), Philadelphia, PA, Sept. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. He, C. Huang, B. Blum, J. Stankovic, and T. Abdelzaher. Range-free localization schemes in large scale sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom), pages 81--95, San Diego, CA, Sept. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. L. Hu and D. Evans. Localization for mobile sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom), Philadelphia, PA, Sept. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. X. Ji and H. Zha. Sensor positioning in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks with multidimensional scaling. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, Apr. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Laman. On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 4:331--340, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. K. Langendoen and N. Reijers. Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks: a quantitative comparison. Computer Networks, 43:499--518, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. H. Lim and J. Hou. Localization for anisotropic sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM,Miami,FL, Apr. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. H. Lim, L. Kung, J. Hou, and H. Luo. Zero-configuration, robust indoor localization: theory and experimentation. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. J. Lin, A. S. Morse, and B. D. O. Anderson. The multi-agent rendezvous problem - The asynchronous case. In Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Paradise Island, Bahamas, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. McLurkin and J. Smith. Distributed algorithms for dispersion in indoor environments using a swarm of autonomous mobile robots. In Proceedings of Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems Conference, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. D. Moore, J. Leonard, D. Rus, and S. Teller. Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), Baltimore, MD, Nov. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. D. Niculescu and B. Nath. Ad-hoc positioning system. In Proceedings of IEEE Globecom, San Antonio, TX, Nov. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. D. Niculescu and B. Nath. Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM,San Francisco, CA, Apr. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. D. Niculescu and B. Nath. VOR basestations for indoor 802.11 positioning. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom), Philadelphia, PA, Sept. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. N. Priyantha, H. Balakrishnan, E. Demaine, and S. Teller. Mobile-assisted localization in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Miami, FL, Apr. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. N. B. Priyantha, A. Chakraborty, and H. Balakrishnan. The Cricket location-support system. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom), pages 32--43, Boston, MA, Aug. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. C. Savarese, J. Rabaey, and K. Langendoen. Robust positioning algorithms for distributed ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of USENIX Technical Annual Conference, Monterey, CA, June 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. A. Savvides, C.-C. Han, and M. B. Strivastava. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom), pages 166--179, Rome, Italy, July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Y. Shang and W. Ruml. Improved MDS-based localization. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, Apr. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Y. Shang, W. Ruml, Y. Zhang, and M. Fromherz. Localization from mere connectivity. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), Annapolis, MD, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. R. Stoleru, T. He, J. Stankovic, and D. Luebke. High-accuracy, low-cost localization system for wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), Nov. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. C. Wang and L. Xiao. Locating sensors in concave environments. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Localization in sparse networks using sweeps

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiCom '06: Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
          September 2006
          428 pages
          ISBN:1595932860
          DOI:10.1145/1161089

          Copyright © 2006 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 September 2006

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader