skip to main content
10.1145/1255175.1255228acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Drowning in data: digital library architecture to support scientific use of embedded sensor networks

Published:18 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

New technologies for scientific research are producing a deluge of data that is overwhelming traditional tools for data capture, analysis, storage, and access. We report on a study of scientific practices associated with dynamic deployments of embedded sensor networks to identify requirements for data digital libraries. As part of continuing research on scientific data management, we interviewed 22 participants in 5 environmental science projects to identify data types and uses, stages in their data life cycle, and requirements for digital library architecture. We found that scientists need continuous access to their data from the time that field experiments are designed through final analysis and publication, thus reflecting a broader notion of "digital library." Six categories of requirements are discussed: the ability to obtain and maintain data in the field, verify data in the field, document data context for subsequent interpretation, integrate data from multiple sources, analyze data, and preserve data. Three digital library efforts currently underway within the Center for Embedded Networked Sensing are addressing these requirements, with the goal of a tightly coupled interoperable framework that, in turn, will be a component of cyberinfrastructure for science.

References

  1. Hey, T. and A. Trefethen, The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective, in Grid Computing-Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality. 2003, Wiley. Retrieved from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/escience/documents/report_datadeluge.pdf on 20 January 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Price, D. J. d. S., Little Science, Big Science. 1963, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Elson, J. and D. Estrin, Sensor networks: A bridge to the physical world, in Wireless sensor networks, C. S. Raghavendra, K. M. Sivalingam, and T. F. Znati, Editors. 2004, Kluwer Academic: Boston. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Pottie, G. J. and W. J. Kaiser, Principles of embedded networked systems design. 2006, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Borgman, C. L., et al., Social Aspects of Digital Libraries. Final Report to the National Science Foundation; Computer, Information Science, and Engineering Directorate; Division of Information, Robotics, and Intelligent Systems; Information Technology and Organizations Program. 1996. Retrieved from http://is.gseis.ucla.edu/research/dl/index.html on 28 September 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Arzberger, P., et al., An International Framework to Promote Access to Data. Science, 2004. 303(5665): p. 1777--1778.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Borgman, C. L., Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. 2007, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hilgartner, S. and S. I. Brandt-Rauf, Data access, ownership and control: Toward empirical studies of access practices. Knowledge, 1994. 15: p. 355--372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Borgman, C. L., J. C. Wallis, and N. Enyedy, Little Science Confronts the Data Deluge: Habitat Ecology, Embedded Sensor Networks, and Digital Libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, in press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Borgman, C. L., J. C. Wallis, and N. Enyedy, Building digital libraries for scientific data: An exploratory study of data practices in habitat ecology. 10th European Conference on Digital Libraries, Alicante, Spain, 2006. Berlin: Springer. LINCS 4172: 170--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shankar, K., Scientific data archiving: the state of the art in information, data, and metadata management. 2003. Retrieved from http://cens.ucla.edu/Education/index.html on 19 January 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ecological Metadata Language. 2004. Retrieved from http://knb.ecoinformatics.org/software/eml/ on 25 November 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity. 2004. Retrieved from http://knb.ecoinformatics.org/index.jsp on 25 November 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Botts, M. Sensor Modeling Language (SensorML) Status. 2006. Retrieved from http://stromboli.nsstc.uah.edu/SensorML/status.html on 20 November 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bishop, A.P ., N. Van House, and B. P. Buttenfield, eds. Digital library use: Social practice in design and evaluation. 2003, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bowker, G. C., Memory Practices in the Sciences. 2005, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. U.S. Long Term Ecological Research Network. 2006. Retrieved from http://lternet.edu/ on 5 June 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Consortium of Universities for Advancement of Hydrologic Science. 2006. Retrieved from http://www.cuahsi.org on 15 November 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Collaborative Large-Scale Engineering Analysis Network for Environmental Research. 2006. Retrieved from http://cleaner.ncsa.uiuc.edu/home/ on 16 August 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lofland, J., et al., Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. 2006, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. National Ecological Observatory Network. 2006. Retrieved from http://neoninc.org/ on 3 October 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Real-time Observatories, Applications, and Data Management Network. 2007. Retrieved from Http://roadnet.ucsd.edu on 3 April 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Observations. 1967, Chicago,: Aldine Pub. Co. x, 271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Open Archives Initiative. 2007. Retrieved from http://www.openarchives.org/ore/ on 4 February 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Pepe, A., C. L. Borgman, M. Mayernik, and J. C. Wallis, Knitting a Fabric of Sensor Data Resources. International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Drowning in data: digital library architecture to support scientific use of embedded sensor networks

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  JCDL '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
                  June 2007
                  534 pages
                  ISBN:9781595936448
                  DOI:10.1145/1255175

                  Copyright © 2007 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 18 June 2007

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader