skip to main content
research-article

Admission of QoS aware users in a smart network

Published:27 March 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Smart networks have grown out of the need for stable, reliable, and predictable networks that will guarantee packet delivery under Quality of Service (QoS) constraints. In this article we present a measurement-based admission control algorithm that helps control traffic congestion and guarantee QoS throughout the lifetime of a connection. When a new user requests to enter the network, probe packets are sent from the source to the destination to estimate the impact that the new connection will have on the QoS of both the new and the existing users. The algorithm uses a novel algebra of QoS metrics, inspired by Warshall's algorithm, to look for a path with acceptable QoS values to accommodate the new flow. We describe the underlying mathematical principles and present experimental results obtained by evaluating the method in a large laboratory test-bed operating the Cognitive Packet Network (CPN) protocol.

References

  1. Bianchi, G., Capone, A., and Petrioli, C. 2000. Throughput analysis of end-to-end measurement-based admission control in IP. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2000). Tel Aviv, Israel, 1461--1470.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Breslau, L., Knightly, E. W., Shenker, S., Stoica, I., and Zhang, H. 2000. Endpoint admission control: architectural issues and performance. In Proceedings of ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communications (SIGCOMM 2000). Stockholm, Sweden, 57--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cetinkaya, C. and Knightly, E. W. 2000. Egress admission control. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2000). Tel Aviv, Israel, 1471--1480.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Z., Gao, L., and Kwiat, K. 2003. Modeling the spread of active worms. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2003). San Francisco, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Elek, V., Karlsson, G., and Ronngren, R. 2000. Admission control based on end-to-end measurements. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2000). Vol. 2. Tel Aviv, Israel, 623--630.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Floyd, R. W. 1962. Algorithm 97: Shortest path. Comm. ACM 5, 6 (June), 345. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Floyd, S. 1996. Comments on measurement-based admissions control for controlled-load services. Tech. rep., Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. (July).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ganesh, A. J., Key, P., Polis, D., and Srikant, R. 2005. Congestion notification and probing mechanisms for endpoint admission control. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 14, 3 (June), 568--578. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gelenbe, E. 1993. Learning in the recurrent random neural network. Neural Computation 5, 1 (Jan.), 154--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gelenbe, E., Gellman, M., Lent, R., Liu, P., and Su, P. 2004. Autonomous smart routing for network qos. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC). New York, NY, 232--239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gelenbe, E., Lent, R., Montuori, A., and Xu, Z. 2002. Cognitive packet networks: QoS and performance. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems (MASCOTS'02). IEEE Computer Society, Fort Worth, TX, 3--12. Opening Keynote Paper. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gelenbe, E., Lent, R., and Xu, Z. 2001. Design and performance of cognitive packet networks. Performance Evaluation 46, 2-3 (Oct.), 155--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gelenbe, E., Mang, X., and Oenvural, R. 1996. Diffusion based statistical call admission control in ATM. Performance Evaluation 27/28, (Oct.), 411--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gelenbe, E., Sakellari, G., and D' Arienzo, M. 2007. Controlling access to preserve QoS in a self-aware network. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Orgnizing Systems (SASO 2007). Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gelenbe, E., Xu, Z., and Seref, E. 1999. Cognitive packet networks. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI '99). IEEE Computer Society Press, Chicago, IL, 47--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gibbens, R. J. and Kelly, F. 1999. Distributed connection acceptance control for a connectionless network. In Proceedings of the 16th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC 99). Vol. 2. Edinburgh, UK, 941--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibbens, R. J., Kelly, F. P., and Key, P. B. 1995. A decision-theoretic approach to call admission control in atm networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm. 13, 6 (Feb.), 1101--1114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Guerin, R., Ahmadi, H., and Naghshineh, M. 1991. Equivalent capacity and its application to bandwidth allocation in high-speed networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm. 9, 7 (Sep.), 968--981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Guerin, R. and Gun, L. 1992. A unified approach to bandwidth allocation and access control in fast packet-switched networks. In Proceeding of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM'92). Vol. 1. Florence, Italy, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. ITU. 2001. End-user multimedia QoS categories. Tech. rep., ITU-T Recommendation G.1010. (Nov.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jamin, S., Danzig, P., Shenker, S., and Zhang, L. 1997a. A measurement-based admission control algorithm for integrated services packet networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 5, 1 (Aug./Sep.), 56--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jamin, S., Shenker, S. J., and Danzig, P. B. 1997b. Comparison of measurement-based admission control algorithms for controlled-load service. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE INFOCOM '97). Vol. 3. IEEE Computer Society Press, Kobe, Japan, 973--980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Perros, H. G. and Elsayed, K. M. 1996. Call admission control schemes: A review. IEEE Comm. Mag. 34, 11 (Nov.), 82--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sakellari, G., D' Arienzo, M., and Gelenbe, E. 2006. Admission control in self aware networks. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2006). San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tse, D. and Grossglauser, M. 1997. Measurement-based call admission control: Analysis and simulation. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM '97). Vol. 3. IEEE Computer Society Press, Kobe, Japan, 981--989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Warshall, S. 1962. A theorem on Boolean matrices. J. ACM 9, 1 (Jan.), 11--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Admission of QoS aware users in a smart network

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
        ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems  Volume 3, Issue 1
        March 2008
        118 pages
        ISSN:1556-4665
        EISSN:1556-4703
        DOI:10.1145/1342171
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 March 2008
        • Accepted: 1 November 2007
        • Revised: 1 September 2007
        • Received: 1 January 2007
        Published in taas Volume 3, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader