skip to main content
10.1145/1349822.1349845acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Human emotion and the uncanny valley: a GLM, MDS, and Isomap analysis of robot video ratings

Published:12 March 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The eerie feeling attributed to human-looking robots and animated characters may be a key factor in our perceptual and cognitive discrimination of the human and humanlike. This study applies regression, the generalized linear model (GLM), factor analysis, multidimensional scaling (MDS), and kernel isometric mapping (Isomap) to analyze ratings of 27 emotions of 18 moving figures whose appearance varies along a human likeness continuum. The results indicate (1) Attributions of eerie and creepy better capture our visceral reaction to an uncanny robot than strange. (2) Eerie and creepy are mainly associated with fear but also shocked, disgusted, and nervous. Strange is less strongly associated with emotion. (3) Thus, strange may be more cognitive, while eerie and creepy are more perceptual/emotional. (4) Human features increase ratings of human likeness. (5) Women are slightly more sensitive to eerie and creepy than men; and older people may be more willing to attribute human likeness to a robot despite its eeriness.

References

  1. H. Choi and S. Choi. Robust kernel isomap. Pattern Recognition, 40(3):853--862, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. Dautenhahn and I. Werry. A quantitative technique for analysing robot--human interactions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 1132--1138, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. Feil-Seifer, K. Skinner, and M. J. Matarić. Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Greenberg, T. Pyszczynski, S. Solomon, L. Simon, and M. Breus. Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58:627--637, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. E. Griffiths. What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, and Y. Yasuda. Interactive robots for communication-care: A case-study in autism therapy. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 341--346, Nashville, TN, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. K. MacDorman, T. Minato, M. Shimada, S. Itakura, S. Cowley, and H. Ishiguro. Assessing human likeness by eye contact in an android test bed. In Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy, July 21-23, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. F. MacDorman. Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley. In ICCS/CogSci-2006 Long Symposium: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, Vancouver, Canada, July 26, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. K. F. MacDorman and H. Ishiguro. The uncanny advantage of using androids in social and cognitive science research. Interaction Studies, 7(3):297--337, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Matsui, T. Minato, K. MacDorman, and H. Ishiguro. Generating natural motion in an android by mapping human motion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Canada, August 2-6, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Mori. Bukimi no tani (the uncanny valley). Energy, 7(4):33--35, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Plutchick. The nature of emotions. American Scientist, 89:344--350, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. J. Prinz. Gut reactions: A perceptual theory of emotion. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. H. Ramey. The uncanny valley of similarities concerning abortion, baldness, heaps of sand, and humanlike robots. In Proceedings of Views of the Uncanny Valley Workshop, IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pages 8--13, Tsukuba, Japan, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Reeves and C. Nass. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI, Stanford, CA, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Rozin and A. E. Fallon. A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94(3):23--41, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. A. Russell. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39:1169--1178, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. P. T., G. J., and S. S. A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: an extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106(4):835--845, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. B. Tenenbaum, V. de Silva, and J. C. Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290:2319--2323, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. Turkle. Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Wada, T. Shibata, T. Saito, and K. Sakamoto, K.and Tanie. Psychological and social effects of one year robot assisted activity on elderly people at a health service facility for the aged. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 2785--2790, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Human emotion and the uncanny valley: a GLM, MDS, and Isomap analysis of robot video ratings

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          HRI '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
          March 2008
          402 pages
          ISBN:9781605580173
          DOI:10.1145/1349822

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 March 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader