skip to main content
10.1145/1367497.1367590acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Facetnet: a framework for analyzing communities and their evolutions in dynamic networks

Published:21 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We discover communities from social network data, and analyze the community evolution. These communities are inherent characteristics of human interaction in online social networks, as well as paper citation networks. Also, communities may evolve over time, due to changes to individuals' roles and social status in the network as well as changes to individuals' research interests. We present an innovative algorithm that deviates from the traditional two-step approach to analyze community evolutions. In the traditional approach, communities are first detected for each time slice, and then compared to determine correspondences. We argue that this approach is inappropriate in applications with noisy data. In this paper, we propose FacetNet for analyzing communities and their evolutions through a robust unified process. In this novel framework, communities not only generate evolutions, they also are regularized by the temporal smoothness of evolutions. As a result, this framework will discover communities that jointly maximize the fit to the observed data and the temporal evolution. Our approach relies on formulating the problem in terms of non-negative matrix factorization, where communities and their evolutions are factorized in a unified way. Then we develop an iterative algorithm, with proven low time complexity, which is guaranteed to converge to an optimal solution. We perform extensive experimental studies, on both synthetic datasets and real datasets, to demonstrate that our method discovers meaningful communities and provides additional insights not directly obtainable from traditional methods.

References

  1. S. Asur, S. Parthasarathy, and D. Ucar. An event-based framework for characterizing the evolutionary behavior of interaction graphs. In Proc. of the 13th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Chakrabarti, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Evolutionary clustering. In Proc. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Chi, X. Song, D. Zhou, K. Hino, and B. L. Tseng. Evolutionary spectral clustering by incorporating temporal smoothness. In Proc. of the 13th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. R. K. Chung. Spectral Graph Theory. American Mathematical Society, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Dhillon, Y. Guan, and B. Kulis. Kernel k-means: spectral clustering and normalized cuts. In Proc. of the 10th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Flake, S. Lawrence, and C. Giles. Efficient identification of web communities. In Proc. of the 6th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. of the ACM, 46(5), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Kumar, J. Novak, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. On the bursty evolution of blogspace. In Proc. of the 12th WWW Conference, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Kumar, J. Novak, and A. Tomkins. Structure and evolution of online social networks. In Proc. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. In Proc. of the 11th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Lin, H. Sundaram, Y. Chi, J. Tatemura, and B. L. Tseng. Blog community discovery and evolution based on mutual awareness expansion. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Web Intelligence, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Q. Mei and C. Zhai. Discovering evolutionary theme patterns from text: an exploration of temporal text mining. In Proc. of the 11th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. H. Ning, W. Xu, Y. Chi, Y. Gong, and T. Huang. Incremental spectral clustering with application to monitoring of evolving blog communities. In SIAM Int. Conf. on Data Mining, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. In Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G. Palla, A.-L. Barabasi, and T. Vicsek. Quantifying social group evolution. Nature, 446, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. Sarkar and A. W. Moore. Dynamic social network analysis using latent space models. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 7(2), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Shi and J. Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(8), 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Spiliopoulou, I. Ntoutsi, Y. Theodoridis, and R. Schult. Monic: modeling and monitoring cluster transitions. In Proc. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Sun, C. Faloutsos, S. Papadimitriou, and P. S. Yu. GraphScope: parameter-free mining of large time-evolving graphs. In Proc. of the 13th ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Toyoda and M. Kitsuregawa. Extracting evolution of web communities from a series of web archives. In HYPERTEXT '03: Proc. of the 14th ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S. White and P. Smyth. A spectral clustering approach to finding communities in graph. In SDM, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. K. Yu, S. Yu, and V. Tresp. Soft clustering on graphs. In NIPS, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. H. Zha, X. He, C. H. Q. Ding, M. Gu, and H. D. Simon. Spectral relaxation for k-means clustering. In NIPS, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Facetnet: a framework for analyzing communities and their evolutions in dynamic networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WWW '08: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web
            April 2008
            1326 pages
            ISBN:9781605580852
            DOI:10.1145/1367497

            Copyright © 2008 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 21 April 2008

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader