skip to main content
research-article

SGF: A state-free gradient-based forwarding protocol for wireless sensor networks

Published:03 April 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Limitation on available resources is a major challenge in wireless sensor networks. Due to high rates of unexpected node/link failures, robust data delivery through multiple hops also becomes a critical issue. In this article we present a state-free gradient-based forwarding (SGF) protocol to address these challenges. Nodes running SGF do not maintain states of neighbors or network topology and thus can scale to very large networks. Without using routing tables, SGF builds a cost field called gradient that provides each node the direction to forward data. The maintenance of gradient is purely driven by data transmissions and hence incurs little overhead. To adapt to transient channel variations and topology changes, the forwarder of a routing node is selected opportunistically among multiple candidate nodes through a distributed contention process. Simulation results show that SGF achieves significant energy savings and outperforms several existing data forwarding protocols in terms of packet delivery ratio and end-to-end delay.

References

  1. Banerjee, S. and Misra, A. 2002. Minimum energy paths for reliable communication in multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'02), 146--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Biswas, S. and Morris, R. 2005. ExOR: Opportunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, 133--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blum, B., He, T., Son, S., and Stankovic, J. 2003. IGF: A state-free robust communication protocol for wireless sensor networks. Tech. rep. CS-2003-11, Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Broch, J., Maltz, D. A., Johnson, D. B., Hu, Y.-C., and Jetcheva, J. 1998. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'98), 85--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cao, Q. and Abdelzaher, T. 2006. Scalable logical coordinates framework for routing in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 2, 4, 557--593. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chang, J.-H. and Tassiulas, L. 2000. Energy conserving routing in wireless ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom). vol. 1. 22--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, B., Jamieson, K., Balakrishnan, H., and Morris, R. 2001. Span: An energy-efficient coordination algorithm for topology maintenance in ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'01), 85--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Couto, D. S. J. D., Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., and Morris, R. 2003. A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'03), 134--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Crossbow. 2003. Mica/mica2/micaz wireless measurement system datasheets. http://inf.tu-dresen.de/dargie/wsn/slides/students/MICA.ppt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong, Q., Banerjee, S., Adler, M., and Misra, A. 2005. Minimum energy reliable paths using unreliable wireless links. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'05), 449--459. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Doshi, S., Bhandare, S., and Brown, T. X. 2002. An on-demand minimum energy routing protocol for a wireless ad hoc network. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Comput. Commun. Rev. 6, 3, 50--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Füssler, H., Widmer, J., Mauve, M., and Hartenstein, H. 2003. A novel forwarding paradigm for position-based routing (with implicit addressing). In Proceedings of IEEE 18th Annual Workshop on Computer Communications (CCW'03), 194--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gomez, J., Campbell, A. T., Naghshineh, M., and Bisdikian, C. 2003. PARO: Supporting dynamic power controlled routing in wireless ad hoc networks. ACM/Kluwer J. Wireless Netw. 9, 5, 443--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Han, K.-H., Ko, Y.-B., and Kim, J.-H. 2004. A novel gradient approach for efficient data dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 60th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), vol. 4, 2979--2983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., and Balakrishnan, H. 2000. Energy-Efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii Inernational Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'00), vol. 2, 3005--3014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Heissenbüttel, M., Braun, T., Bernoulli, T., and Wälchli, M. 2004. BLR: Beacon-Less routing algorithm for mobile ad-hoc networks. Elsevier's Comput. Commun. J. 27, 11, 1076--1086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Huang, P., Yang, X., and Tan, Y. 2008. A Robust and Energy-Efficient Approach for Image/Video Dissemination in WSNs. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC'08).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Intanagonwiwat, C., Govindan, R., Estrin, D., Heidemann, J., and Silva, F. 2003. Directed diffusion for wireless sensor networking. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 11, 1, 2--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jain, S. and Das, S. R. 2005. Exploiting path diversity in the link layer in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM'05), 22--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lee, S.-J. and Gerla, M. 2000. AODV-BR: Backup routing in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference (WCNC'00), vol. 3, 1311--1316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, S.-J. and Gerla, M. 2001. Split multipath routing with maximally disjoint paths in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC'01), vol. 10, 3201--3205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, L., Halpern, J. Y., Bahl, P., Wang, Y.-M., and Wattenhofer, R. 2005. A cone-based distributed topology-control algorithm for wireless multi-hop networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 13, 1, 147--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Li, X.-Y., Chen, H., Shu, Y., Chu, X., and Wu, Y.-W. 2006. Energy efficient routing with unreliable links in wireless networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS'06), 160--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, Z., Nandi, S., and Gupta, A. K. 2005. ECS: An enhanced carrier sensing mechanism for wireless ad hoc networks. Elsevier's Comput. Commun. 28, 17, 1970--1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lin, S., Zhang, J., Zhou, G., Gu, L., He, T., and Stankovic, J. A. 2006. ATPC: Adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'06), 223--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Marina, M. K. and Das, S. R. 2001. On-Demand multipath distance vector routing in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP 01), 14--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Monks, J. P., Bharghavan, V., and Hwu, W.-M. W. 2001. A power controlled multiple access protocol for wireless packet networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom), vol. 1, 219--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Muqattash, A. and Krunz, M. 2003. Power controlled dual channel (PCDC) medium access protocol for wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom), vol. 1, 470--480.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Muqattash, A. and Krunz, M. 2005. POWMAC: A single-channel power-control protocol for throughput enhancement in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun. 23, 5, 1067--1084. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Perkins, C. E. and Royer, E. M. 1999. Ad-Hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA'99), 90--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Qiao, D., Choi, S., Jain, A., and Shin, K. G. 2003. Adaptive transmit power control in IEEE 802.11a wireless LANs. In Proceedings of the 57th IEEE Semiannual Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), vol. 1, 433--437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramanathan, R. and Rosales-Hain, R. 2000. Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom), vol. 2, 404--413.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Rappaport, T. S. 2001. Wireless Communication: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Royer, E. M. and Perkins, C. E. 1999. Multicast operation of the ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'99), 207--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Santi, P. 2005. Topology control in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. ACM Comput. Surv. 37, 2, 164--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Schurgers, C. and Srivastava, M. B. 2001. Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Military Communications Conference (MilCom), vol. 1, 357--361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Shah, R., Wolisz, A., and Rabaey, J. 2005. On the performance of geographical routing in the presence of localization errors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC'05), 2979--2985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Singh, S. and Raghavendra, C. S. 1998. PAMAS - Power aware multi-access protocol with signalling for ad hoc networks. ACM Comput. Commun. Rev. 28, 3, 5--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Singh, S., Woo, M., and Raghavendra, C. S. 1998. Power-Aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'98). 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Son, D., Krishnamachari, B., and Heidemann, J. 2004. Experimental study of the effects of transmission power control and blacklisting in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (IEEE SECON'04), 289--298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Witt, M. and Turau, V. 2006. The impact of location errors on geographic routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications (ICWMC'06), 76--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Woo, A., Tong, T., and Culler, D. 2003. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'03). 14--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Xing, G., Lu, C., Zhang, Y., Huang, Q., and Pless, R. 2005. Minimum power configuration in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'05), 390--401. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Xu, Y., Bien, S., Mori, Y., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2003. Topology control protocols to conserve energy in wireless ad hoc networks. Tech. rep. 6, University of California, Los Angeles, Center for Embedded Networked Computing. January.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu, Y., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2001. Geography-Informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'01), 70--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Ye, F., Chen, A., Lu, S., and Zhang, L. 2001. A scalable solution to minimum cost forwarding in large sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN'01), 304--309.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Ye, F., Zhong, G., Cheng, J., Lu, S., and Zhang, L. 2003. PEAS: A robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS'03), 28--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Ye, F., Zhong, G., Lu, S., and Zhang, L. 2005. GRAdient Broadcast: A robust data delivery protocol for large scale sensor networks. ACM Wireless Netw. 11, 3, 285--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ye, W., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2002. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom), vol. 3, 1567--1576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. SGF: A state-free gradient-based forwarding protocol for wireless sensor networks

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
                  ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 5, Issue 2
                  March 2009
                  284 pages
                  ISSN:1550-4859
                  EISSN:1550-4867
                  DOI:10.1145/1498915
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 2009 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 3 April 2009
                  • Accepted: 1 May 2008
                  • Revised: 1 February 2008
                  • Received: 1 August 2007
                  Published in tosn Volume 5, Issue 2

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article
                  • Research
                  • Refereed

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader