skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529333acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Collaborative modeling of business processes: a comparative case study

Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study collaborative modeling of business processes with respect to the impact of tool support on the modeling process. For this purpose we compared model quality and modeling costs in two cases. The first was carried out with the help of a collaborative modeling tool; in the second case we kept all other parameters as closely as possible to the first one but conducted the modeling session in the usual way without tool support. We observed a marked increase in modeling time in the second case and a reduction in model quality.

References

  1. Bommel, P. v., Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., Proper, H. A. E., Weide, T. P. v. d.: Exploring Modelling Strategies in a Meta-modelling Context. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.): On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops - OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, AWESOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SebGIS, Proceedings, Part II, Montpellier, France, Vol. 4278. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2006) 1128--1137 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Frederiks, P. J. M., Weide, T. P. v. d.: Information Modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants. Data & Knowledge Engineering 58 (2006) 4--20 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., Lindeman, L., Proper, H. A.: Capturing Modeling Processes - Towards the MoDial Modeling Laboratory. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.): On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops - OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, AWESOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SebGIS, Proceedings, Part II, Montpellier, France, Vol. 4278. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2006) 1242--1252 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., Proper, H. A., Weide, T. P. v. d.: Formal Modelling as a Grounded Conversation. In: Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., Haraldson, S. (eds.): Proceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP'05), Kiruna, Sweden. Linköpings Universitet and Högskolan i Borås, Linköping and Borås (2005) 139--155Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Persson, A.: Enterprise Modelling in Practice: Situational Factors and their Influence on Adopting a Participative Approach. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University (2001)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dean, D., Orwig, R., Lee, J., Vogel, D.: Modeling with a group modeling tool: group support, model quality, and validation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Vol.IV: Information Systems: Collaboration Technology Organizational Systems and Technology, 4--7 Jan 1994, Vol. 4. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA (1994) 214--223Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dean, D. L., Orwig, R. E., Vogel, D. R.: Facilitation Methods for Collaborative Modeling Tools. Group Decision and Negotiation 9 (2000) 109--127Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Clark, H. H., Brennan, S. E.: Grounding in communication. In: Resnick, L. B., Levine, J., Teasley, S. D. (eds.): Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1991) 127--149Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Moody, D. L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: Current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineering 15 (2005) 243--276 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., Schütte, R.: Guidelines of modelling (GoM). Wirtschaftsinformatik 37 (1995) 435--445Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lindland, O. I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modelling. IEEE Software 11 (1994) 42--49 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Conklin, J., Selvin, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Sierhuis, M.: Facilitated Hypertext for Collective Sensemaking: 15 Years on from gIBIS. In: Weigand, H., Goldkuhl, G., de Moor, A. (eds.): Proceedings of the 8th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modeling (LAP'03), Tilburg, The Netherlands (2003)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pereira Meire, A., Borges, M. R. S., Araújo, R. M. d.: Supporting multiple viewpoints in collaborative graphical editing. Multimedia Tools and Applications 32 (2007) 185--208 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Santoro, F. M., Borges, M. R. S., Pino, J. A.: CEPE: Cooperative Editor for Processes Elicitation. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Volume 1. IEEE Computer Society (2000) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Richardson, G., Andersen, D. F.: Teamwork in group model building. System Dynamics Review 11 (1995) 113--137Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Verhoef, C.: Quantifying the value of IT-investments. Science of Computer Programming 56 (2005) 315--342 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Aiken, M., Vanjani, M., Krosp, J.: Group decision support systems. Review of Business 16 (1995) 38--42Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bamber, E. M., Watson, R. T., Hill, M. C.: The effects of group support system technology on audit group decision-making. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15 (1996) 122--134Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Benbasat, I., Lim, L. H.: The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research 24 (1993) 430--462Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bidgoli, H.: A new productivity tool for the 90's: Group support systems. Journal of Systems Management 47 (1996) 56--62Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Burke, K., Chidambaram, L., Lock, J.: Evolution of relational factors over time: A study of distributed and non-distributed meetings. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 4 (1995) 14--23 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Cass, K., Heintz, T. J., Kaiser, K. M.: Using a voice-synchronous GDSS in dispersed locations: A preliminary analysis of participant satisfaction. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 3 (1991) 555--563Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Chudoba, K. M.: Appropriations and patterns in the use of group support systems. Database for Advances in Information Systems 30 (1999) 131--148 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S. R.: An assessment of group support systems experiment research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (1998/1999) 7--149 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jackson, N. F., Aiken, M. W. V., Mahesh, B. H., Bassam, S.: Support group decisions via computer systems. Quality Progress 28 (1995) 75--78Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Townsend, A. M., Whitman, M. E., Hendrickson, A. R.: Computer support system adds power to group processes. HRMagazine 40 (1995) 87--91Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Collaborative modeling of business processes: a comparative case study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
      March 2009
      2347 pages
      ISBN:9781605581668
      DOI:10.1145/1529282

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 March 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader