ABSTRACT
We study collaborative modeling of business processes with respect to the impact of tool support on the modeling process. For this purpose we compared model quality and modeling costs in two cases. The first was carried out with the help of a collaborative modeling tool; in the second case we kept all other parameters as closely as possible to the first one but conducted the modeling session in the usual way without tool support. We observed a marked increase in modeling time in the second case and a reduction in model quality.
- Bommel, P. v., Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., Proper, H. A. E., Weide, T. P. v. d.: Exploring Modelling Strategies in a Meta-modelling Context. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.): On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops - OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, AWESOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SebGIS, Proceedings, Part II, Montpellier, France, Vol. 4278. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2006) 1128--1137 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frederiks, P. J. M., Weide, T. P. v. d.: Information Modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants. Data & Knowledge Engineering 58 (2006) 4--20 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., Lindeman, L., Proper, H. A.: Capturing Modeling Processes - Towards the MoDial Modeling Laboratory. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.): On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops - OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, AWESOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SebGIS, Proceedings, Part II, Montpellier, France, Vol. 4278. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2006) 1242--1252 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., Proper, H. A., Weide, T. P. v. d.: Formal Modelling as a Grounded Conversation. In: Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., Haraldson, S. (eds.): Proceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP'05), Kiruna, Sweden. Linköpings Universitet and Högskolan i Borås, Linköping and Borås (2005) 139--155Google Scholar
- Persson, A.: Enterprise Modelling in Practice: Situational Factors and their Influence on Adopting a Participative Approach. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University (2001)Google Scholar
- Dean, D., Orwig, R., Lee, J., Vogel, D.: Modeling with a group modeling tool: group support, model quality, and validation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Vol.IV: Information Systems: Collaboration Technology Organizational Systems and Technology, 4--7 Jan 1994, Vol. 4. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA (1994) 214--223Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dean, D. L., Orwig, R. E., Vogel, D. R.: Facilitation Methods for Collaborative Modeling Tools. Group Decision and Negotiation 9 (2000) 109--127Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clark, H. H., Brennan, S. E.: Grounding in communication. In: Resnick, L. B., Levine, J., Teasley, S. D. (eds.): Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1991) 127--149Google Scholar
- Moody, D. L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: Current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineering 15 (2005) 243--276 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Becker, J., Rosemann, M., Schütte, R.: Guidelines of modelling (GoM). Wirtschaftsinformatik 37 (1995) 435--445Google Scholar
- Lindland, O. I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modelling. IEEE Software 11 (1994) 42--49 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Conklin, J., Selvin, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Sierhuis, M.: Facilitated Hypertext for Collective Sensemaking: 15 Years on from gIBIS. In: Weigand, H., Goldkuhl, G., de Moor, A. (eds.): Proceedings of the 8th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modeling (LAP'03), Tilburg, The Netherlands (2003)Google Scholar
- Pereira Meire, A., Borges, M. R. S., Araújo, R. M. d.: Supporting multiple viewpoints in collaborative graphical editing. Multimedia Tools and Applications 32 (2007) 185--208 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Santoro, F. M., Borges, M. R. S., Pino, J. A.: CEPE: Cooperative Editor for Processes Elicitation. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Volume 1. IEEE Computer Society (2000) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richardson, G., Andersen, D. F.: Teamwork in group model building. System Dynamics Review 11 (1995) 113--137Google ScholarCross Ref
- Verhoef, C.: Quantifying the value of IT-investments. Science of Computer Programming 56 (2005) 315--342 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aiken, M., Vanjani, M., Krosp, J.: Group decision support systems. Review of Business 16 (1995) 38--42Google Scholar
- Bamber, E. M., Watson, R. T., Hill, M. C.: The effects of group support system technology on audit group decision-making. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15 (1996) 122--134Google Scholar
- Benbasat, I., Lim, L. H.: The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research 24 (1993) 430--462Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bidgoli, H.: A new productivity tool for the 90's: Group support systems. Journal of Systems Management 47 (1996) 56--62Google Scholar
- Burke, K., Chidambaram, L., Lock, J.: Evolution of relational factors over time: A study of distributed and non-distributed meetings. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 4 (1995) 14--23 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cass, K., Heintz, T. J., Kaiser, K. M.: Using a voice-synchronous GDSS in dispersed locations: A preliminary analysis of participant satisfaction. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 3 (1991) 555--563Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chudoba, K. M.: Appropriations and patterns in the use of group support systems. Database for Advances in Information Systems 30 (1999) 131--148 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S. R.: An assessment of group support systems experiment research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (1998/1999) 7--149 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackson, N. F., Aiken, M. W. V., Mahesh, B. H., Bassam, S.: Support group decisions via computer systems. Quality Progress 28 (1995) 75--78Google Scholar
- Townsend, A. M., Whitman, M. E., Hendrickson, A. R.: Computer support system adds power to group processes. HRMagazine 40 (1995) 87--91Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Collaborative modeling of business processes: a comparative case study
Recommendations
A Case-Study of Wiki-Supported Collaborative Drafting of Business Processes Models
CBI '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business InformaticsRedesign of business processes is an activity frequently performed in modern organizations as a response to intrinsic and extrinsic change requirements. The way (methods, techniques, tools) a process is redesigned varies greatly with the process ...
Using roles and business objects to model and understand business processes
SAC '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computingBusiness process modeling focus on describing how activities interact with other business objects while sustaining the organization's strategy. Business objects are object-oriented representations of organizational concepts, such as resources and actors,...
Modeling e-government business processes: New approaches to transparent and efficient performance
Government Information Sharing and Integration: Combining the Social and the Technical. Papers from the 9th International Conference on Digital Government Research (d.g.o.2008)Many governments worldwide are restructuring their business practices to improve their performances. To help describe and understand the process of restructuring, modeling techniques are used at different levels of modeling abstraction. This paper ...
Comments