skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529766acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opportunistic real-time routing in multi-hop wireless sensor networks

Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are subject to significant resource constraints. Particularly, routing protocols for low-rate WSNs suffer from maintaining routing metrics and stable links of paths. Even though opportunistic routing protocols are well-suited to WSNs, they have some weaknesses for supporting real-time data and low power consumption. This paper proposes a new routing protocol called opportunistic real time routing (or ORTR) that guarantees delivery of data under time constraints with efficient power consumption. In order to satisfy time requirements, an area where real-time data must be delivered is defined with effective transmission power and a relay node within the area is selected for the purpose of balancing overall energy levels. We compare existing routing protocols against ORTR through a set of simulation experiments. Our simulation results illustrate that ORTR provides guaranteed real-time service with optimal transmission power without degrading the energy balance.

References

  1. Chipcon CC2420 Data Sheet. http://www.chipcon.com, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. IEEE 802.15.4 standard. http://standard.ieee.org/, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. AL-Karaki and A. Kamal. Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Comm., 15(5):795--825, Dec. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Biswas and R. Morris. Exor: Opportunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 35(4):133--144, Oct. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. O. Chipara, Z. He, G. Xing, Q. Chen, X. Wang, C. Lu, J. Stankovic, and T. Abdelzaher. Real-time power-aware routing in sensor networks. In IEEE IWQOS, pages 83--92, June 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. D. Coute, D. Aguayo, B. Chambers, and R. Morris. Performance of multihop wireless networks: Shortest path is not enough. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 33(1):83--88, Jan. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Felemban, C.-G. Lee, and E. Ekici. MMSPED: Multipath multi-speed protocol for qos guarantee of reliability and timeliness in wireless sensor netowrks. IEEE Trans. on Mibile Computing, 5(6):738--754, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Friis. A note on a simple transmission formula. IEEE IRE, 34(5):254--256, 1946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T. He, J. A. Stankovic, C. Lu, and T. Adbelzaher. SPEED: A real-time routing protocol for sensor networks. IEEE ICDCS, 15(5):795--825, Nov. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. W. Jia, T. Wang, G. Wang, and M. Guo. Hole avoiding in advance routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE WCNC, May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Latre, P. D. Mil, I. Moerman, B. Dhoedt, and P. Demeester. Throughput and delay analysis of unslotted ieee 802.15.4. Journal of Networks, 1(1):20--28, May 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. H. Peng, Z. Xi, C. X. L. Ying, and G. Chuanshan. An adaptive real-time routing scheme for wireless sensor networks. ACM AINAW, 2:918--922, May 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. C. Shah, S. Wietholter, J. Rabaey, and A. Wolisz. When does opportunistic routing make sense? IEEE PerCom, pages 350--356, Mar. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. C. Shah, S. Wietholter, A. Wolisz, and J. Rabaey. Modeling and analysis of opportunistic routingin low traffic scenarios. IEEE WIOPT, pages 294--304, Apr. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Takagi and L. Kleinrock. Optimal transmission range for randomly distributed packet radio terminals. IEEE Trans on Comm., 32(3):795--825, Mar. 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K. Zeng, W. Lou, J. Yang, and B. Donald R. On throughput efficiency of geographic opportunistic routing in multihop wireless networks. Mobile Network Application, 15(12):347--357, Apr. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Zuniga and B. Krishnamachari. Analyzing the transitinal region in low power wireless links. IEEE SECON, pages 517--526, Oct. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Opportunistic real-time routing in multi-hop wireless sensor networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
          March 2009
          2347 pages
          ISBN:9781605581668
          DOI:10.1145/1529282

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 March 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader