skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753619acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Artificial subtle expressions: intuitive notification methodology of artifacts

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe artificial subtle expressions (ASEs) as intuitive notification methodology for artifacts' internal states for users. We prepared two types of audio ASEs; one was a flat artificial sound (flat ASE), and the other was a sound that decreased in pitch (decreasing ASE). These two ASEs were played after a robot made a suggestion to the users. Specifically, we expected that the decreasing ASE would inform users of the robot's lower level of confidence about the suggestions. We then conducted a simple experiment to observe whether the participants accepted or rejected the robot's suggestion in terms of the ASEs. The results showed that they accepted the robot's suggestion when the flat ASE was used, whereas they rejected it when the decreasing ASE was used. Therefore, we found that the ASEs succeeded in conveying the robot's internal state to the users accurately and intuitively.

References

  1. Kendon, A. Do gestures communicate? A Review. Research in Language and Social Interaction 27, 3 (1994), 175--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cohen, P. R., Morgen, J., and Pollack, M. E. Intentions in Communication, The MIT Press, MA, USA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu, K. and Picard, W. R. Subtle expressivity in a robotic computer. In Proc. CHI2003 Workshop on Subtle Expressivity for Characters and Robots (2003), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sugiyama, O., Kanda, T., Imai, M., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N. and Anzai, Y. Humanlike conversation with gestures and verbal cues based on a three-layer attention-drawing model. Connection Science 18, 4 (2006), 379--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kipp, M. and Gebhard, P. IGaze: Studying reactive gaze behavior in semi-immersive human-avatar interactions, In Proc. IVA2008 (2008), 191--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Komatsu, T. and Yamada, S. How do robotic agents' appearances affect people's interpretation of the agents' attitudes? Ext. Abstracts CHI2007, ACM Press (2007), 2519--2524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Funakoshi, K., Kobayashi, K., Nakano, M., Yamada, S., Kitamura, Y., and Tsujino H. Smoothing human-robot speech interactions by using blinking-light as subtle expression. In Proc. ICMI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 293--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Blattner, M. M., Sumikawa, D. A. and Greenberg, R. M. Earcons and Icons: Their Structure and Common Design Principles. SIGCHI Bull. 21, 1 (1989), 123--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gaver, W. W. The SonicFinder: An Interface That Uses Auditory Icons. Human-Computer Interaction 4, 1 (1989), 67--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Artificial subtle expressions: intuitive notification methodology of artifacts

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2010
        2690 pages
        ISBN:9781605589299
        DOI:10.1145/1753326

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader