skip to main content
research-article

LU factoring of non-invertible matrices

Published:29 July 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The definition of the LU factoring of a matrix usually requires that the matrix be invertible. Current software systems have extended the definition to non-square and rank-deficient matrices, but each has chosen a different extension. Two new extensions, both of which could serve as useful standards, are proposed here: the first combines LU factoring with full-rank factoring, and the second extension combines full-rank factoring with fraction-free methods. Amongst other applications, the extension to full-rank, fraction-free factoring is the basis for a fractionfree computation of the Moore-Penrose inverse.

References

  1. Anonymous. Contributors to the proceedings of the I.R.E. Proceedings of the I.R.E., page 1328, November 1947.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Howard Anton and Chris Rorres. Elementary Linear Algebra. Wiley, 9th edition, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. T. Banachiewicz. Cracow Observatory Reprint: ' Etudes d'analyse pratique, volume 22. University of Cracow, 1938.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Erwin H. Bareiss. Sylvester's identity and multistep integer-preserving Gaussian elimination. Mathematics of Computation, 22(103):565--578, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Ben-Israel and T.N.F. Greville. Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications. Wiley, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Claude Brezinski. The life and work of André Cholesky. Numer. Algorithms, 43:279--288, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. M. Corless and D. J. Jeffrey. The Turing factorization of a rectangular matrix. SIGSAM Bull., 31(3):20--30, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Robert M. Corless and David J. Jeffrey. Well ... it isn't quite that simple. SIGSAM Bulletin, 26(3):2--6, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P.D. Crout. A short method for evaluating determinants and solving systems of linear equations with real or complex coefficients. Trans. Amer. Institute Elec. Engng, 60:1235--1240, 1941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. James W. Demmel. Applied Numerical Linear Algebra. SIAM, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P.S. Dwyer. The Doolittle technique. Ann. Math. Stat., 12:449--458, 1941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P.S. Dwyer. Linear Computations. Wiley, New York, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R.W. Farebrother. A memoir of the life of M.H. Doolittle. Bulletin Inst. Math. Applic., 23:102, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K.O. Geddes, G. Labahn, and S. Czapor. Algorithms for Computer Algebra. Kluwer, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gene Golub and Charles Van Loan. Matrix Computations, 2nd edition. Johns Hopkins Press, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nicholas J. Higham. Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms. Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Leslie Hogben, editor. Handbook of linear algebra. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Stephen B. Leacock. Nonsense Novels, chapter Gertrude the Governess. Wildside Press, 1911.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. George C. Nakos, Peter R. Turner, and Robert M. Williams. Fraction-free algorithms for linear and polynomial equations. SIGSAM Bull., 31(3):11--19, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Piziak and P. L. Odell. Full rank factorization of matrices. Mathematics Magazine, 72(3):193--201, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Robert Piziak and P.L. Odell. Matrix Theory: From Generalized Inverses to Jordan Form. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lloyd N. Trefethen and David Bau III. Numerical Linear Algebra. Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Alan M. Turing. Rounding-off errors in matrix processes. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 1:287--308, 1948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Wenqin Zhou and D.J. Jeffrey. Fraction-free matrix factors: new forms for LU and QR factors. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 2(1):67--80, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. LU factoring of non-invertible matrices

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Communications in Computer Algebra
          ACM Communications in Computer Algebra  Volume 44, Issue 1/2
          March/June 2010
          77 pages
          ISSN:1932-2240
          DOI:10.1145/1838599
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2010 Author

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 July 2010

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader