skip to main content
10.1145/1850771.1850789acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjtresConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The embedded Java benchmark suite JemBench

Published:19 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Requirements to embedded systems increase steadily. In parallel, also the performance of the processors used in these systems is improved leading to multithreaded and/or multicore architectures. Depending on the type of the embedded system, using Java is a more and more popular way for software development. In this paper, we present a Java benchmark suite that enables the comparison of different embedded Java platforms while solely assuming the availability of a CLDC API, the minimal configuration defined for the J2ME. The core of the benchmark suite consists of adapted real-world applications. Furthermore, the suite contains benchmarks to explore multi-core/multi-threaded systems. Hence, it is possible to determine the gain of a parallel execution platform compared to sequential execution. Additionally, the penalty of a sequential program running on a parallel platform can be measured. Our benchmarks are structured in micro, kernel, application, parallel, and streaming benchmarks.

References

  1. aJile. aj-100 real-time low power Java processor. preliminary data sheet, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aonix. Perc pico 1.1 user manual. http://research.aonix.com/jsc/pico-manual.4-19-08.pdf, April 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin Armbruster, Jason Baker, Antonio Cunei, Chapman Flack, David Holmes, Filip Pizlo, Edward Pla, Marek Prochazka, and Jan Vitek. A real-time Java virtual machine with applications in avionics. Trans. on Embedded Computing Sys., 7(1):1--49, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. M. Blackburn, R. Garner, C. Hoffman, A. M. Khan, K. S. McKinley, R. Bentzur, A. Diwan, D. Feinberg, D. Frampton, S. Z. Guyer, M. Hirzel, A. Hosking, M. Jump, H. Lee, J. E. B. Moss, A. Phansalkar, D. Stefanović, T. VanDrunen, D. von Dincklage, and B. Wiedermann. The DaCapo benchmarks: Java benchmarking development and analysis. In OOPSLA '06: Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-Oriented Programing, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 169--190, New York, NY, USA, October 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Stephen M. Blackburn, Kathryn S. McKinley, Robin Garner, Chris Hoffmann, Asjad M. Khan, Rotem Bentzur, Amer Diwan, Daniel Feinberg, Daniel Frampton, Samuel Z. Guyer, Martin Hirzel, Antony Hosking, Maria Jump, Han Lee, J. Eliot B. Moss, Aashish Phansalkar, Darko Stefanovik, Thomas VanDrunen, Daniel von Dincklage, and Ben Wiedermann. Wake up and smell the coffee: evaluation methodology for the 21st century. Commun. ACM, 51(8):83--89, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Greg Bollella, James Gosling, Benjamin Brosgol, Peter Dibble, Steve Furr, and Mark Turnbull. The Real-Time Specification for Java. Java Series. Addison-Wesley, June 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Chen, M. Kandemir, N. Vijaykrishnan, and M. J. Irwin. Pennbench: A benchmark suite for embedded java. In in the IEEE 5th Annual Workshop on Workload Characterization, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brian P. Doherty. A real-time benchmark for java#8482;. In JTRES '07: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Java technologies for real-time and embedded systems, pages 35--46, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sudheendra Hangal and Mike O'Connor. Performance analysis and validation of the picojava processor. IEEE Micro, 19:66--72, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Trevor Harmon, Martin Schoeberl, Raimund Kirner, and Raymond Klefstad. A modular worst-case execution time analysis tool for Java processors. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS 2008), pages 47--57, St. Louis, MO, United States, April 2008. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. John Hennessy and David Patterson. Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach, 3rd ed. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Palo Alto, CA 94303, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Thomas Henties, James J. Hunt, Doug Locke, Kelvin Nilsen, Martin Schoeberl, and Jan Vitek. Java for safety-critical applications. In 2nd International Workshop on the Certification of Safety-Critical Software Controlled Systems (SafeCert 2009), York, United Kingdom, Mar. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tomas Kalibera, Jeff Hagelberg, Filip Pizlo, Ales Plsek, Ben Titzer, and Jan Vitek. Cdx: a family of real-time java benchmarks. In JTRES '09: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Java Technologies for Real-Time and Embedded Systems, pages 41--50, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Andreas Krall and Reinhard Grafl. CACAO -- A 64 bit JavaVM just-in-time compiler. In Geoffrey C. Fox and Wei Li, editors, PPoPP'97 Workshop on Java for Science and Engineering Computation, Las Vegas, June 1997. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mälardalen Real-Time Research Center. WCET benchmarks. Available at http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/projects/wcet/benchmarks.html, accessed 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Caffeinemark 3.0 benchmark. Available at http://www.benchmarkhq.ru/cm30/info.html, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Christof Pitter and Martin Schoeberl. A real-time Java chip-multiprocessor. Trans. on Embedded Computing Sys., accepted for publication, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Filip Pizlo, Lukasz Ziarek, and Jan Vitek. Real time java on resource-constrained platforms with fiji vm. In JTRES '09: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Java Technologies for Real-Time and Embedded Systems, pages 110--119, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Martin Schoeberl. Evaluation of a Java processor. In Tagungsband Austrochip 2005, pages 127--134, Vienna, Austria, October 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin Schoeberl. Application experiences with a real-time Java processor. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress, pages 9320--9325, Seoul, Korea, July 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Martin Schoeberl, Wolfgang Puffitsch, Rasmus Ulslev Pedersen, and Benedikt Huber. Worst-case execution time analysis for a Java processor. Software: Practice and Experience, 40/6:507--542, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Fridtjof Siebert and Andy Walter. Deterministic execution of Java's primitive bytecode operations. In Proceedings of the Java Virtual Machine Research and Technology Symposium (JVM '01): April 23--24, 2001, Monterey, California, USA. Berkeley, CA, pages 141--152. USENIX, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Doug Simon, Cristina Cifuentes, Dave Cleal, John Daniels, and Derek White. Java on the bare metal of wireless sensor devices: the squawk Java virtual machine. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Virtual execution environments (VEE 2006), pages 78--88, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jose Solorzano. leJOS: Java based os for lego RCX. Available at: http://lejos.sourceforge.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sun Microsystems. J2ME Building Blocks for Mobile Devices, White Paper on KVM and the Connected, Limited Device Configuration (CLDC), May 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun Microsystems. Connected Limited Device Configuration Specification, Version 1.1, March 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sascha Uhrig. Evaluation of different multithreaded and multicore processor configurations for sopc. In SAMOS '09: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation, pages 68--77, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sascha Uhrig and Jörg Wiese. jamuth -- an IP Processor Core for Embedded Java Real-Time Systems. In The 5th International Workshop on Java Technologies for Real-time and Embedded Systems - JTRES 2007, Vienna, Austria, September 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Martin Zabel, Thomas B. Preusser, Peter Reichel, and Rainer G. Spallek. Secure, real-time and multi-threaded general-purpose embedded Java microarchitecture. In Prceedings of the 10th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design Architectures, Methods and Tools (DSD 2007), pages 59--62, Lübeck, Germany, Aug. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Martin Zabel and Rainer G. Spallek. SHAP --- scalable multi-core Java bytecode processor. Technical report, Fakultät Informatik, Technische Universität Dresden, 2009. ftp://ftp.inf.tu-dresden.de/pub/berichte/tud09-13.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. The embedded Java benchmark suite JemBench

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      JTRES '10: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Java Technologies for Real-Time and Embedded Systems
      August 2010
      183 pages
      ISBN:9781450301220
      DOI:10.1145/1850771

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 August 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate50of70submissions,71%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader