skip to main content
10.1145/1935826.1935920acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Low-order tensor decompositions for social tagging recommendation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social tagging recommendation is an urgent and useful enabling technology for Web 2.0. In this paper, we present a systematic study of low-order tensor decomposition approach that are specifically targeted at the very sparse data problem in tagging recommendation problem. Low-order polynomials have low functional complexity, are uniquely capable of enhancing statistics and also avoids over-fitting than traditional tensor decompositions such as Tucker and Parafac decompositions. We perform extensive experiments on several datasets and compared with 6 existing methods. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing approaches.

References

  1. Bibsonomy Dataset, http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/bibsonomy/dumps.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. MovieLens Dataset, http://www.grouplens.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, pages 734--749, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Hotho, R. Jaschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pages 411--426, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Jaschke, L. Marinho, A. Hotho, L. Schmidt-Thieme, and G. Stumme. Tag recommendations in social bookmarking systems. AI Communications, 21(4):231--247, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(5):604--632, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Kolda and B. Bader. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM review, 51(3):455--500, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Rendle, L. Balby Marinho, A. Nanopoulos, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Learning optimal ranking with tensor factorization for tag recommendation. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 727--736. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Rendle and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 81--90. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Reidl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, page 295. ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Schifanella, A. Barrat, C. Cattuto, B. Markines, and F. Menczer. Folks in folksonomies: Social link prediction from shared metadata. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 271--280. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Symeonidis, A. Nanopoulos, and Y. Manolopoulos. Tag recommendations based on tensor dimensionality reduction. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 43--50. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Symeonidis, A. Nanopoulos, and Y. Manolopoulos. A unified framework for providing recommendations in social tagging systems based on ternary semantic analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. Tomasi and R. Bro. PARAFAC and missing values. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 75(2):163--180, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K. Tso-Sutter, L. Marinho, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Tag-aware recommender systems by fusion of collaborative filtering algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 1995--1999. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Z. Xu, Y. Fu, J. Mao, and D. Su. Towards the semantic web: Collaborative tag suggestions. In Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006, Edinburgh, Scotland. Citeseer, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Low-order tensor decompositions for social tagging recommendation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WSDM '11: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
        February 2011
        870 pages
        ISBN:9781450304931
        DOI:10.1145/1935826

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 February 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        WSDM '11 Paper Acceptance Rate83of372submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate498of2,863submissions,17%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader