skip to main content
10.1145/1940761.1940777acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expressing well-being online: towards self-reflection and social awareness

Published:08 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Medicine, psychology and quality of life literature all point to the importance of not just asking 'how are you?', but assessing and being aware of self and others' well-being. Social networking has been shown to have a variety of uses and benefits, but does not currently offer explicit expression of a well-being state. We developed and deployed Healthii, a social networking tool to convey well-being using a set of pre-defined discrete categories. We sought to understand how communicating this in a lightweight fashion may be used and valued. Using a hybrid methodology, over five weeks ten participants used the tool on Facebook, Twitter, or on the desktop, and in group meetings discussed the affect and effect of the tool, before a final individual survey. The trial showed that participants used and valued status expression for its support to convey state, and for self-reflection and group awareness. We discuss these findings as well as future opportunities for awareness visualization and automatic data integration.

References

  1. André, P., schraefel, m. c. & Dix, A. I feel so 1323 today: capturing, portraying, and interpreting well-being online. Poster paper in UIST'09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Begole, J. 'B'., Tang, J. C., Smith, R. B. & Yankelovich, N. Work rhythms: analyzing visualizations of awareness histories of distributed groups. In CSCW '02, pp. 334--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P. & Sengers, P. Affect: from information to interaction. In Critical Computing '05. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brewer, M. & Gardner, W. Who is this "we"? levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(1), (1996), pp. 83--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Brown, T. J. Self informatics. In CHI '09 Workshop: Designing for Reflection on Experience.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Detmar, S., Aaronson, N. K., Wever, L. D. V., Muller, M. & Schornagel, J. H. How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. Journal of Clinical Oncology 18(18), (2000), 3295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J. & Suh, E. Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry 9(1), (1998), pp. 33--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gaver, B. Provocative awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11(3), (2002), pp. 475--493. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, B., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N. & Eiderbääck, B. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In CHI '03. pp. 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Joinson, A. N. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? motives and use of Facebook. In CHI '08, pp. 1027--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kaye, J. 'J'. Beyond usability: designing for evaluating experience. In DIS '06 Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuwabara, K., Ohguro, T., Watanabe, T., Itoh, Y. & Maeda, Y. Connectedness oriented communication: fostering a sense of connectedness to augment social relationships. In SAINT '02, pp. 186--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lane, R. D. Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion, (2002) Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lurey, J. & Raisinghani, M. An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams, Information & Management 38(8), (2001), pp. 523--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Makice, K. Phatics and the design of community. In CHI Extended Abstracts '09, pp. 3133--3136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Martinetti, E. A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen's functioning approach. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 2, (2000), pp. 207--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mishne, G. Experiments with mood classification in blog posts. In SIGIR '05 Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Naaman, M., Boase, J. & Lai, C. Is it really about me? message content in social awareness streams. In CSCW'10, pp. 189--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S. & Bradner, E. Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In CSCW '00, pp. 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Norman, G. Hi! How are you? response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies. Quality of Life Research 12(3), (2003), pp. 239--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Peiris, D., Gregor, P. & Alm, N. The effects of simulating human conversational style in a computer-based interview, Interacting with Computers 12(6), (2000), pp. 635--650.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Schmidt, K. The problem with 'awareness'. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11(3), (2002), pp. 285--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Searle, J. R. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. (1985). Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., Warner, S. & Jenkins, T. Evaluating affector: co-intepreting what 'works'. In CHI '05 Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Skeels, M. M. & Grudin, J. When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of Facebook and linkedin. In GROUP '09, pp. 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Strong, R. & Gaver, B. Feather, scent and shaker: supporting simple intimacy. In CSCW '96, pp. 29--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sundström, P., Ståhl, A. & Hööök, K. In situ informants exploring an emotional mobile messaging system in their everyday practice. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(4), (2007), pp. 388--403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Expressing well-being online: towards self-reflection and social awareness

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        iConference '11: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference
        February 2011
        858 pages
        ISBN:9781450301213
        DOI:10.1145/1940761

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 February 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader