skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979070acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhancing interactional synchrony with an ambient display

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nonverbal communication is an essential part of face-to-face social interaction, conveying information about emotion and interpersonal relationships. The rigorous sensing capabilities of pervasive technologies and the subtle nature of ambient technologies make them ideal to support the production of nonverbal communication in social interactions. In this paper we present a study using an ambient technology that supports nonverbal communication, and specifically nonverbal behaviours associated with rapport. We show that an ambient display can influence a participant's nonverbal behaviour, and that participants are not aware of this change in their behaviour. We discuss these findings in terms of the design and ethical issues that it raises, and define an agenda for future work.

References

  1. Ara, K., et al., Sensible Organisations: Changing out Businesses and Work Styles through Sensor Data. J. of Information Processing 16, (2008), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Argyle, M., Bodily Communication. Methuen, London, (1975).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barron, B., When Smart Groups Fail. J. of Learning Sciences 12, 3 (2003), 307--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Berdichevsky, D. and Neuenschwander, E., Towards an Ethics of Persuasive Technology. Comms. of the ACM 42, 5 (1999), 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bernieri, F., Coordinated Movement and Rapport in Teacher-Student Interactions. J. of Nonverbal Behaviour 12, 2 (1988), 120--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bernieri, F., Davis, J., Rosenthal, R., Knee, R., Interactional Synchrony and Rapport: Measuring Synchrony in Displays Devoid of Sound and Facial Expression. Personality and Social Psych. Bulletin 20, (1994), 303--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bernieri, F., Gillis, J., Davis, J., GRahe, J., Dyad Rapport and the Accuracy of Its Judgement across Situations: A Lens Model Analysis. J. of Personality and Social Psych. 71, 1 (1996), 110--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Berzowska, J. Memory Rich Clothing: Second Skins That Communicate Phsyical Memory. In Proc. Creativity and Cognition, ACM (2005), 32--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Borovoy, R., Martin, F., Resnick, M., Silverman, B., Groupwear: Nametags That Tell About Relationships, In Proc. CHI ACM (1998), 329--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Borovoy, R., Martin, F., Vermuri, S., Resnick, M., Silverman, B., Hancock, C., Meme Tags and Community Mirrors: Moving from Conferences to Collaboration. In Proc. CSCW (1998), 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bull, P., Posture and Gesture. Pergamon press, (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. DiMicco, J.M., Pandolfo, A., and Bender, W. Influencing Group Participation with a Shared Display. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (2004), 614--623. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Falk, J., Björk, S., The Bubblebadge: A Wearable Public Display, In Proc. CHI 1999 ACM (1999), 318--319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ham, J., Midden, C., and Beute, F. Can Ambient Persuasive Technology Persuade Unconsciously? Using Sublimial Feedback to Influence Energy Consumption Ratings of Household Appliances. In Proc. Persuasive Technology, ACM (2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hodgins, H. and Zuckerman, M., The Effect of Nonverbal Sensitivity on Social Interaction. J. of Nonverbal Behaviour 14, 3 (1990), 155--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanis, M., Winters, N., Agamanolis, S., Gavin, A., Cullinan, C., Toward Wearable Social Networking with Iband. In Proc. CHI, ACM (2005), 1521--1524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kendon, A., Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behaviour in Focused Encounters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, T., Chang, A., Holland, L., Pentland., Meeting Mediator: Enhancing Group Collaboration Using Sociometric Feedback. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (2008), 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Laborde, G., Influencing with Integrity: Management Skills for Communication and Negotiation. Crown House Publishing, (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. LaFrance, M., Nonverbal Synchrony and Rapport: Analysis by the Cross-Lag Panel Technique. Social Psych. Quarterly 42, 1 (1979), 66--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lakin, J., Chartland, T., and Arkin, R., Nonconscious Mimicry as an Automatic Behavioural Response to Social Exclusion. Psych. Science 19, 8 (2008), 816--822.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lakin, J. and Chartrand, T., Using Non-Conscious Behavioural Mimicry to Creat Affiliation and Rapport. Psych. Science 14, 4 (2003), 334--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lieberman, M., Intuition: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach. Pysch. Bulletin 126, 1 (2000), 109--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mccarthy, J., McDonald, D., Soroczak, S., Ngyuyen, D., Rashid, A., Augmenting the Social Space of an Academic Conference, In Proc. CSCW, ACM (2004) 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. McDonald, D.W., McCarthy, J., Soroczak, S., Nguyen, D., Rashid, D., Proactive Displays: Supporting Awareness in Fluid Social Environments. ACM Trans. Comp.-Hum. Interaction 14, 4 (2008), 1--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Monfries, M. and Kafer, N., Neglected and Rejected Children: A Social-Skills Model. The J. of Psych. 121, 4 (1987), 401--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Narumi, T., Akagawa, T., Ah Seong, Y., Hirose, M., An Entertainment System Using Thermal Feedback for Increasing Communication and Social Skills. Lecture Notes in Com. Sci. 5690, (2009), 184--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ngyuyen, D., T., and Canny, J. More Than Face-to-Face: Empathy Effects of Video Framing. In Proc. CHI ACM (2009), 423--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Olguín Olguín, D. and Pentland, A. Sensible Organizations: A Sensor Based System for Organizational Design and Engineering. In Proc. Workshop on Organizational Design and Engineering (2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Palmer, M. and Simmons, K., Communicating Intentions through Nonverbal Behaviours: Conscious and Nonconscious Encoding of Liking. Human Comm. Research 22, 1 (1995), 128--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Pentland, A., Honest Signals - How They Shape Our World. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Reeves, B. and Nass, C., The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. CSLI Publications, California, (1996). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rogers, Y., Hazelwood, W., Marshall, P., Dalton, N, S., Hertich, S., Ambient Influence: Can Twinkly Lights Lure and Abstract Representations Trigger Behavioral Change. In Proc. Ubicomp 2010, ACM (2010) 261--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Schlenker, B. and Weigold, M., Interpersonal Processes Involving Impression Regulation and Management. Annual Review of Psych. 43, (1992), 133--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott, S., Shyness and Society: The Illusion of Competence. Palgrave Macmillan, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Stel, M. and Roos, V., Mimicry in Social Interaction: Benefits for Mimickers, Mimickees, and Their Interaction. Brit. J. of Psych. 101, (2010), 311--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. 3Tickle-Degnen, L. and Rosenthal, R., The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlates. Psych. Inquiry 1, 4 (1990), 285--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing interactional synchrony with an ambient display
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2011
      3530 pages
      ISBN:9781450302289
      DOI:10.1145/1978942

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader