Satwinder Singh
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
To assist maintenance and evolution teams, work needs to be done at the onset of software development. One such facilitation is refactoring the code, making it easier to read, understand and maintain. Refactoring is done by identifying bad smell areas in the code. In this paper, based on empirical analysis, we develop a metrics model to identify smelly classes. The role of two new metrics (encapsulation and information hiding) is also investigated for identifying smelly and faulty classes in software code. This paper first presents a binary statistical analysis of thev relationship between metrics and bad smells, the results of which show a significant relationship. Then, the metrics model (with significant metrics shortlisted from the binary analysis) for bad smell categorization (divided into five categories) is developed. To verify our model, we examine the open source Firefox system, which has a strong industrial usage. The results show that proposed metrics model for bad smell can predict faulty classes with high accuracy, but in the case of the categorized model not all categories of bad smells can adequately identified the faulty and smelly classes. Due to certain limitations of our study more experiments are required to generalize the results of bad smell and faulty class identification in software code.
- Abreau, F.B., M. Goulão, R. Esteves, Toward the design quality evaluation of object-orientated software systems, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. On Software Quality, 1995.Google Scholar
- Abreau, F.B., W. Melo, Evaluating the impact of object-orientated design on software quality, Proc. 3rd International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'96), IEEE, Berlin, Germany, March, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bansiya J, David CG, A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality. IEEE Transactions on software engineering, 2002, 28, pp. 4--17 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Basili, V.L., Briand, L., Melo, W.L., A validation of object-oriented metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1996, 22(10), pp. 751--761. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beck K., Beedle M., van Bennekum A., Cockburn A., Cunningham W., Fowler M, Grenning J et al. Manifesto for agile software development 2001. Available from http://agilemanifesto.org/Google Scholar
- Bieman, J., Kang, B.K., Measuring Design Level cohesion, IEEE Transactions on software engineering, 1998,24(2), 111--124. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Briand, L. C., Daly, J.W., Wust, J., (1998) A Unified Framework for Cohesion Measurement in Object Oriented Systems, Empirical Software Engineering Journal, 1998,3(1), 65--117. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Briand, L., Arisholm, E., Counsell S., Houdek, F. and Thevenod-Fosse, P., Empirical Studies of Object-Oriented Artifacts, Methods, and Processes: State of the Art and Future Direction, Empirical Software Engineering, 1999, 4(4), 387--404. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Briand, L.C., Wuest, J., Daly, J.W., Porter, D.V., Exploring the relationship between design measures and software quality in object oriented systems. Journal of Systems and Software 2000, 51(3), 245--273. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cao Y., Zhu, Q., Improved Metrics for Encapsulation Based on Information Hiding, The 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, 2008, 1(1), 742--747. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cartwright, M., Shepperd, M., An empirical investigation of an object-oriented software system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2000, 26(7), 786--796. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chidamber S.R., Kemerer C.F., Towards a metrics suite for object oriented design, Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA '91), 1991, 197--21 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F., A Metric Suite for Object-Oriented design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, June 1994, 20(6), 476--493. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Coleman D, Ash D, Lowther B, Oman PW, Using metrics to evaluate software system maintainability. IEEE Computing Practices, 1994, 27(8), 44--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Hosmer and S. Lemeshow, Applied Logistic Regression, second ed. John Wiley and Sons, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dhambri, K., Sahraoui, H., Poulin. P., Visual detection of design anomalies. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, IEEE CS, Tampere, Finland, April 2008, 279--283. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emam, K.E., Benlarbi, S., Goel, N., Rai, S.N., The confounding effect of class size on the validity of object-oriented metrics. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2001, 27(7), 630--648. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emam, K.E., Melo, Walcelio, Machado, Javam, The prediction of faulty classes using object-oriented design metrics. The Journal of Systems and Software, 2001, 56, 63--75. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Etzkorn L. H. et al., A comparison of cohesion metrics for objectoriented systems. Information and Software Technology., 2004,46(10), 677--687.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Simon, F, Steinbruckner, F., Lewerentz. C., Metrics based refactoring. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'01) IEEE CS Press, 2001, pp 30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fawcett, T., ROC graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers. Machine Learning, 2004, pp. 31Google Scholar
- Fowler, Martin, Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wisely, 2000.Google Scholar
- Francisca Munoz Bravo, A Logic Meta-Programming Framework for Supporting the Refactoring Process. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium, 2003.Google Scholar
- Grady RB, Successfully applying software metrics. IEEE Computer Vol 27, No. 9, pp. 18--25 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gronback Richard C., Software Remodeling : Improving Design and Implementation Quality Using audits , metrics and refactoring in Borland Together Control Centre, A Borland White Paper, January, 2003.Google Scholar
- Gyimothy, T., Ferenc, R., Siket, I., Empirical validation of objectoriented metrics on open source software for fault prediction. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2005, 31(10), 897--910. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harrison, R., Counsell, S.J., Nithi, R.V., An Evaluation of the MOOD Set of Object-Oriented Software Metrics, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1998, 24, 491--496. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henderson-Sellers, B., Object-Oriented Metrics: Measures of complexity, Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hitz, M. and Montazeri, B., Measuring Coupling and Cohesion in Object Oriented systems, International Symposium on Applied Corporate computing, Monterey, Mexico, 1995, 25--27.Google Scholar
- Hitz, M., Montazeri, B., Chidamber and Kemerer's metrics suite: A measurement perspective, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1996, 22(4), 267--271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- http:// www.frontendart.comGoogle Scholar
- J.M. Bieman, J.M., Kang, B., Cohesion and Reuse in an Object-Oriented System, ACM System Symposium on Software Reusability, 1995, 259--262. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khan, R.A., Metric Based Testability Model for Object Oriented Design ( MTMOOD ) SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2009, 34(2), 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khomh F, Penta MD. An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Antipatterns on Class Change- and Fault-Proneness. Available at: www.ptidej.net/downloads/experiments/emse10/TR.pdf. Accessed 23 December 2010 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kutner, Nachtsheim, Neter, Applied Linear Regression Models, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2004.Google Scholar
- Li W, Shatnawi R., An empirical study of the bad smells and class error probability in the post-release object-oriented system evolution. Journal of Systems and Software. 2007, 80(7), 1120--1128. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0164121206002780 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, W. and Henry, S., Object-Oriented Metrics that Predict Maintainability, Journal of Systems and Software, 1993,23(2), 111--122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mäntylä MV, Lassenius C. Subjective evaluation of software evolvability using code smells: An empirical study. Empirical Software Engineering., 2006, 11(3), 395--431. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marinescu, R., Detecting design flaws via metrics in object-oriented systems. In Proceedings of the TOOLS, USA 39, Santa Barbara, USA, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marticorena, R., Lopez C., Crespo Y., Extending a Taxonomy of Bad Code Smells with Metrics, WOOR'06, Nantes, 2006.Google Scholar
- Mayer T., Hall, T., A Critical Analysis of Current OO Design Metrics, Software Quality Journal, 1999, 8(2), 97--110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mayer, T., Hall, T., Measuring OO Systems: A Critical Analysis of the MOOD Metrics, Proceedings of Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, Nancy, 1999, 108--117. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shatnawi R, Li W., The effectiveness of software metrics in identifying error-prone classes in post-release software evolution process. Journal of Systems and Software., 2008,81(11),1868--1882. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Subramanyam R, Krishnan MS, Empirical analysis of CK metrics for object-oriented design complexity: implications for software defects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2003, 29(4), 297--310 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tsui, F., Bonja, C., Duggins, S. and Karam, O., An Ordinal Metric for Intra-Method Class Cohesion, Proceedings of IADIS Applied Computing Conference, Algarve, Portugal, April 2008.Google Scholar
- Rule Package Description for FrontEndART Monitor. 2009:1-4 available at http://www.frontendart.com/sites/default/files/BSM.pdfGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Effectiveness of encapsulation and object-oriented metrics to refactor code and identify error prone classes using bad smells
Recommendations
Effectiveness of refactoring metrics model to identify smelly and error prone classes in open source software
In order to improve software maintainability, possible improvement efforts must be made measurable. One such effort is refactoring the code which makes the code easier to read, understand and maintain. It is done by identifying the bad smell area in the ...
Prioritising Refactoring Using Code Bad Smells
ICSTW '11: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation WorkshopsWe investigated the relationship between six of Fowler et al.'s Code Bad Smells (Duplicated Code, Data Clumps, Switch Statements, Speculative Generality, Message Chains, and Middle Man) and software faults. In this paper we discuss how our results can ...
Code Bad Smells: a review of current knowledge
Fowler et al. identified 22 Code Bad Smells to direct the effective refactoring of code. These are increasingly being taken up by software engineers. However, the empirical basis of using Code Bad Smells to direct refactoring and to address ‘trouble’ in ...
Comments