skip to main content
10.1145/2024156.2024208acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Image smoothing via L0 gradient minimization

Published:12 December 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a new image editing method, particularly effective for sharpening major edges by increasing the steepness of transition while eliminating a manageable degree of low-amplitude structures. The seemingly contradictive effect is achieved in an optimization framework making use of L0 gradient minimization, which can globally control how many non-zero gradients are resulted in to approximate prominent structure in a sparsity-control manner. Unlike other edge-preserving smoothing approaches, our method does not depend on local features, but instead globally locates important edges. It, as a fundamental tool, finds many applications and is particularly beneficial to edge extraction, clip-art JPEG artifact removal, and non-photorealistic effect generation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a174-xu.mp4

mp4

46.1 MB

References

  1. Arbelaez, P., Maire, M., Fowlkes, C., and Malik, J. 2011. Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33, 898--916. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bae, S., and Durand, F. 2007. Defocus magnification. Comput. Graph. Forum 26, 3, 571--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bae, S., Paris, S., and Durand, F. 2006. Two-scale tone management for photographic look. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 637--645. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Baek, J., and Jacobs, D. E. 2010. Accelerating spatially varying gaussian filters. ACM Trans. Graph.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Black, M. J., Sapiro, G., Marimont, D. H., and Heeger, D. 1998. Robust anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 7, 3, 421--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Blake, A., and Zisserman, A. 1987. Visual reconstruction. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., and Zabih, R. 2001. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 23, 11, 1222--1239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chen, J., Paris, S., and Durand, F. 2007. Real-time edge-aware image processing with the bilateral grid. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Choudhury, P., and Tumblin, J. 2003. The trilateral filter for high contrast images and meshes. In Rendering Techniques, 186--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Comaniciu, D., and Meer, P. 2002. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 5, 603--619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Criminisi, A., Sharp, T., Rother, C., and Pérez, P. 2010. Geodesic image and video editing. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 5, 134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., and Egiazarian, K. O. 2007. Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16, 8, 2080--2095. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. DeCarlo, D., and Santella, A. 2002. Stylization and abstraction of photographs. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3, 769--776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Donoho, D. 2006. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 52, 4, 1289--1306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Durand, F., and Dorsey, J. 2002. Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3, 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Farbman, Z., Fattal, R., Lischinski, D., and Szeliski, R. 2008. Edge-preserving decompositions for multi-scale tone and detail manipulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Farbman, Z., Fattal, R., and Lischinski, D. 2010. Diffusion maps for edge-aware image editing. ACM Trans. Graph.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Fattal, R., Agrawala, M., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2007. Multiscale shape and detail enhancement from multi-light image collections. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Fattal, R. 2009. Edge-avoiding wavelets and their applications. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kass, M., and Solomon, J. 2010. Smoothed local histogram filters. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Levin, A., Lischinski, D., and Weiss, Y. 2004. Colorization using optimization. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 689--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Levin, A., Fergus, R., Durand, F., and Freeman, W. T. 2007. Image and depth from a conventional camera with a coded aperture. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Li, Y., Sun, J., Tang, C.-K., and Shum, H.-Y. 2004. Lazy snapping. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 303--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Li, Y., Sharan, L., and Adelson, E. H. 2005. Compressing and companding high dynamic range images with subband architectures. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3, 836--844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lischinski, D., Farbman, Z., Uyttendaele, M., and Szeliski, R. 2006. Interactive local adjustment of tonal values. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 646--653. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Liu, J., Sun, J., and Shum, H.-Y. 2009. Paint selection. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., Sapiro, G., and Zisserman, A. 2009. Non-local sparse models for image restoration. In ICCV, 2272--2279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Maji, S., Vishnoi, N., and Malik, J. 2011. Biased normalized cuts. In CVPR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Paris, S., and Durand, F. 2006. A fast approximation of the bilateral filter using a signal processing approach. In ECCV (4), 568--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Paris, S., Hasinoff, S. W., and Kautz, J. 2011. Local laplacian filters: Edge-aware image processing with a laplacian pyramid. ACM Trans. Graph.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Perona, P., and Malik, J. 1990. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12, 7, 629--639. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rother, C., Kolmogorov, V., and Blake, A. 2004. "grab-cut": interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 309--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rudin, L., Osher, S., and Fatemi, E. 1992. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 60, 1--4, 259--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Subr, K., Soler, C., and Durand, F. 2009. Edge-preserving multiscale image decomposition based on local extrema. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tomasi, C., and Manduchi, R. 1998. Bilateral filtering for gray and color images. In ICCV, 839--846. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Tumblin, J., and Turk, G. 1999. Lcis: A boundary hierarchy for detail-preserving contrast reduction. In SIGGRAPH, 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., and Simoncelli, E. P. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 4, 600--612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wang, G., Wong, T.-T., and Heng, P.-A. 2006. Deringing cartoons by image analogies. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 4, 1360--1379. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Wang, Y., Yang, J., Yin, W., and Zhang, Y. 2008. A new alternating minimization algorithm for total variation image reconstruction. SIAM J. Imaging Sciences 1, 3, 248--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Weiss, B. 2006. Fast median and bilateral filtering. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 519--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Winnemöller, H., Olsen, S. C., and Gooch, B. 2006. Realtime video abstraction. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 1221--1226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Image smoothing via L0 gradient minimization

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SA '11: Proceedings of the 2011 SIGGRAPH Asia Conference
        December 2011
        730 pages
        ISBN:9781450308076
        DOI:10.1145/2024156

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 December 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate178of869submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader