Christian Bird
Nachiappan Nagappan
Brendan Murphy
Harald Gall
Premkumar Devanbu
ABSTRACT
Ownership is a key aspect of large-scale software development. We examine the relationship between different ownership measures and software failures in two large software projects: Windows Vista and Windows 7. We find that in all cases, measures of ownership such as the number of low-expertise developers, and the proportion of ownership for the top owner have a relationship with both pre-release faults and post-release failures. We also empirically identify reasons that low-expertise developers make changes to components and show that the removal of low-expertise contributions dramatically decreases the performance of contribution based defect prediction. Finally we provide recommendations for source code change policies and utilization of resources such as code inspections based on our results.
- R. Banker, G. Davis, and S. Slaughter. Software development practices, software complexity, and software maintenance performance: A field study. Management Science, 44(4):433--450, 1998. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- V. Basili and G. Caldiera. Improve Soft-ware Quality by Reusing Knowledge and Experience. Sloan Management Review, 37:55--55, 1995.Google Scholar
- V. Basili, G. Caldiera, and H. Rombach. The Goal Question Metric Approach. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, 1:528--532, 1994.Google Scholar
- K. Beck and C. Andres. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Bird, N. Nagappan, P. Devanbu, H. Gall, and B. Murphy. Does distributed development affect software quality? an empirical case study of windows vista. In Proc. of the International Conference on Software Engineering, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Bird, N. Nagappan, P. Devanbu, H. Gall, and B. Murphy. Putting it All Together: Using Socio-Technical Networks to Predict Failures. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Boh, S. Slaughter, and J. Espinosa. Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Science, 53(8):1315--1331, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Brooks. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, 20th Anniversary Edition. Addison-Wesley, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Cataldo, P. Wagstrom, J. Herbsleb, and K. Carley. Identification of coordination requirements: implications for the Design of collaboration and awareness tools. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 353--362, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Curtis, H. Krasner, and N. Iscoe. A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communication of the ACM, 31(11):1268--1287, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Darr, L. Argote, and D. Epple. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Science, 41(11):1750--1762, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Dowdy, S. Wearden, and D. Chilko. Statistics for research. John Wiley & Sons, third edition, 2004.Google Scholar
- K. El Emam, S. Benlarbi, N. Goel, and S. N. Rai. The confounding effect of class size on the validity of object-oriented metrics. IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering, 27(7):630--650, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Elbaum and J. Munson. Code churn: A measure for estimating the impact of code change. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Fritz, G. Murphy, and E. Hill. Does a programmer's activity indicate knowledge of code? In Proc. of the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering, page 350. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Kraut and L. Streeter. Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM, 38(3):69--81, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. W. Lancaster. Information Retrieval Systems: Characteristics, Testing, and Evaluation. Wiley, 2nd edition, 1979.Google Scholar
- D. W. McDonald and M. S. Ackerman. Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture. In Proc. of the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Meneely and L. A. Williams. Secure open source collaboration: an empirical study of linus' law. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Milo, N. Kashtan, S. Itzkovitz, M. E. J. Newman, and U. Alon. On the uniform generation of random graphs with prescribed degree sequences. Arxiv preprint cond-mat/0312028, 2003.Google Scholar
- A. Mockus. Succession: Measuring transfer of code and developer productivity. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Mockus and J. D. Herbsleb. Expertise browser: a quantitative approach to identifying expertise. In Proc. of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Mockus and D. Weiss. Predicting risk of software changes. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 5(2):169--180, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Molloy and B. Reed. A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence. Random Struct. Algorithms, 6(2-3):161--179, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Nagappan and T. Ball. Use of relative code churn measures to predict system defect density. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 284--292, May 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Nagappan, B. Murphy, and V. Basili. The influence of organizational structure on software quality: an empirical case study. In Proc. of the 30th international conference on Software engineering, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. E. J. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, and D. J. Watts. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys. Rev. E, 64(2):026118, Jul 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Ostrand, E. Weyuker, and R. Bell. Where the bugs are. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Pinzger, N. Nagappan, and B. Murphy. Can developer-module networks predict failures? In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of software engineering, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Rahman and P. Devanbu. Ownership, Experience and Defects: a fine-grained study of Authorship. In Proceedings ICSE 2011, To appear, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Robillard. The role of knowledge in software development. Communications of the ACM, 42(1):92, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Sacks. On-the-Job Learning in the Software Industry. Corporate Culture and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Quorum Books, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881., 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Srivastava, J. Thiagarajan, and C. Schertz. Efficient Integration Testing using Dependency Analysis. Technical Report MSR-TR-2005-94, Microsoft Research, 2005.Google Scholar
- S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. J. Weyuker, T. J. Ostrand, and R. M. Bell. Do too many cooks spoil the broth? using the number of developers to enhance defect prediction models. Empirical Softw. Engg., 13(5):539--559, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Don't touch my code!: examining the effects of ownership on software quality
Recommendations
Revisiting code ownership and its relationship with software quality in the scope of modern code review
ICSE '16: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software EngineeringCode ownership establishes a chain of responsibility for modules in large software systems. Although prior work uncovers a link between code ownership heuristics and software quality, these heuristics rely solely on the authorship of code changes. In ...
Visible watermarking with reversibility of multimedia images for ownership declarations
Digital watermarking technology is primarily the joining of the rightful owner of the protected media. Once the media are suspected to be illegally used, an open algorithm can be used to extract the digital watermark for the purpose of showing the media'...
A fragile color image watermarking framework focusing a new invisible domain
ICCCS '11: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Communication, Computing & SecurityAuthentication of multimedia contents attended a broad attention due to illegal copying of digital contents and unauthorized recording and distribution that leads cyber crime in a massive form. Our focused area is digital color image and its ...
Comments