skip to main content
research-article

Adaptive and Radio-Agnostic QoS for Body Sensor Networks

Published:01 November 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

As wireless devices and sensors are increasingly deployed on people, researchers have begun to focus on wireless body-area networks. Applications of wireless body sensor networks include healthcare, entertainment, and personal assistance, in which sensors collect physiological and activity data from people and their environments. In these body sensor networks, quality of service is needed to provide reliable data communication over prioritized data streams. This article proposes BodyQoS, the first running QoS system demonstrated on an emulated body sensor network. BodyQoS adopts an asymmetric architecture, in which most processing is done on a resource-rich aggregator, minimizing the load on resource-limited sensor nodes. A virtual MAC is developed in BodyQoS to make it radio-agnostic, allowing a BodyQoS to schedule wireless resources without knowing the implementation details of the underlying MAC protocols. Another unique property of BodyQoS is its ability to provide adaptive resource scheduling. When the effective bandwidth of the channel degrades due to RF interference or body fading effect, BodyQoS adaptively schedules remaining bandwidth to meet QoS requirements. We have implemented BodyQoS in NesC on top of TinyOS, and evaluated its performance on MicaZ devices. Our system performance study shows that BodyQoS delivers significantly improved performance over conventional solutions in combating channel impairment.

References

  1. Aad, I. and Castelluccia, C. 2001. Differentiation mechanisms for IEEE 802.11. In Proceedings of the IEEE InfoCom Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn, C. S., Campbell, A., Veres, S., and Sun, L. H. 2002. Supporting service differentiation for real-time and best effort traffic in stateless wireless ad hoc networks (swan). In IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 1, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Biswas, S. and Morris, R. 2005. ExOR: Opportunistic multihop routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. BSN Proceedings. 2011. http://www.bsn-web.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ChipconCC1000. 2011. Chipcon CC1000 low power radio transceiver. http://www.chipcon.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ChipconCC2420. 2011. CC2420 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee-ready RF transceiver. http://www.chipcon.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Crossbow. 2011. XBOW mote specifications. http://www.xbow.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ee, C. T. and Bajcsy, R. 2004. Congestion control and fairness for many-to-one routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SenSys Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ganti, R. K., Jayachandran, P., Abdelzaher, T. F., and Stankovic, J. A. 2006. SATIRE: A software architecture for smart atTIRE. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Garg, P., Doshi, R., Greene, R., Baker, M., Malek, M., and Cheng, X. 2003. Using IEEE 802.11e MAC for QoS over wireless. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Harvard CodeBlue. 2011. CodeBlue: Sensor networks for medical care. http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/ mdw/proj/codeblue/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. He, T., Stankovic, J. A., Lu, C., and Abdelzaher, T. F. 2003. SPEED: A stateless protocol for real-time communication in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, S., Culler, D., and Pister, K. 2000. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS-IX). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hull, B., Jamieson, K., and Balakrishnan, H. 2004. Mitigating congestion in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. IEEE 802.11. 1999. IEEE 802.11, Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specification. ANSI/IEEE Std. 802.11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. IEEE 802.15.1. 2002. IEEE 802.15.1: Wireless medium access control (MAC)and physical layer (PHY) specifications for wireless personal area networks (WPANs). http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. IEEE 802.15.4. 2003. IEEE 802.15.4, Wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs). http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG4.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Johansson, A. J. 2002. Wave-propagation from medical implants-Influence of body shape on radiation pattern. In Proceedings of the 2nd Joint EMBS/BMES Conference.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kidd, C. D., Orr, R. J., Abowd, G. D., Atkeson, C. G., Essa, I. A., Macintyre, D., Mynatt, E., Starner, T. E., and Newstetter, W. 1999. The aware home: A living laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. In Proceedings of the CoBuild Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kim, S., Fonseca, R., Dutta, P., Tavakoli, A., Culler, D., Levis, P., Shenker, S., and Stoica, I. 2007. Flush: A reliable bulk transport protocol for multihop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor (SenSyS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Liu, Y., Elhanany, I., and Qi, H. 2005. An energy-efficient QoS-aware media access control protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. MIThril. 2011. MIThril. http://www.media.mit.edu/wearables/mithril/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Natarajan, A., Motani, M., de Silva, B., Yap, K., and Chua, K. C. 2007. Investigating network architectures for body sensor networks. In Proceedings of the HealthNet’07 Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Paek, J. and Govindan, R. 2007. Rate-Controlled reliable transport for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Polastre, J., Hill, J., and Culler, D. 2004. Versatile low power median access for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Polastre, J., Hui, J., Levis, P., Zhao, J., Culler, D., Shenker, S., and Stoica, I. 2005. A unifying link abstraction for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rangwala, S., Gummadi, R., Govindan, R., and Psounis, K. 2006. Interference-Aware fair rate control in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Roelens, L., den Bulcke, V., Joseph, S., Vermeeren, W., and Martens, L. G. 2006. Path loss model for wireless narrowband communication above flat phantom. IEEE Electron. Let. 92, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. RSVP. 2011. Resource reSerVation pProtocol. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2205.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Akan, Ö. B., and Akyildiz, I. F. 2003. Esrt: Event-to-Sink reliable transport in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Shah, R. C., Nachman, L., and Wan, C.-Y. 2011. On the performance of bluetooth and IEEE 802.15.4 radios in a body area network. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Body Area Networks (BodyNets’08). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Stann, F. and Heidemann, J. 2003. RMST: Reliable data transport in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Sensor Net Protocols and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. UFL Smart House. 2011. UFL smart house. http://www.rerc.ufl.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. UVA Smart House. 2011. UVA smart house. http://www.marc.med.virginia.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wan, C., Eisenman, S., and Campbell, A. 2003. CODA: Congestion Detection and Avoidance in Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wan, C.-Y., Campbell, A. T., and Krishnamurthy, L. 2002. PSFQ: A reliable transport protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Werner-Allen, G., Lorincz, K., Johnson, J., Lees, J., and Welsh, M. 2006. Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network. In Proceedings of the ACM USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Zhao, Q. and Tong, L. 2003. QoS specific medium access control for wireless sensor networks with fading. In Proceedings of the SPSC Conference on Embedded Networked Sensors.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou, G., Lu, J., Wan, C.-Y., Yarvis, M. D., and Stankovic, J. A. 2008. BodyQoS: Adaptive and radio-agnostic QoS for body sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE InfoCom Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhou, G., Stankovic, J. A., and Son, S. F. 2006. Crowded spectrum in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Embedded Networked Sensors (EmNets).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhu, H. and Cao, G. 2005. On supporting power-efficient streaming applications in wireless environments. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 4, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive and Radio-Agnostic QoS for Body Sensor Networks

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in

                  Full Access

                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
                    ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems  Volume 10, Issue 4
                    November 2011
                    297 pages
                    ISSN:1539-9087
                    EISSN:1558-3465
                    DOI:10.1145/2043662
                    Issue’s Table of Contents

                    Copyright © 2011 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 1 November 2011
                    • Accepted: 1 July 2010
                    • Revised: 1 May 2009
                    • Received: 1 February 2008
                    Published in tecs Volume 10, Issue 4

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • research-article
                    • Research
                    • Refereed

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader