Taewoo Nam
ABSTRACT
This paper sees a smart city not as a status of how smart a city is but as a city's effort to make itself smart. The connotation of a smart city represents city innovation in management and policy as well as technology. Since the unique context of each city shapes the technological, organizational and policy aspects of that city, a smart city can be considered a contextualized interplay among technological innovation, managerial and organizational innovation, and policy innovation. However, only little research discusses innovation in management and policy while the literature of technology innovation is abundant. This paper aims to fill the research gap by building a comprehensive framework to view the smart city movement as innovation comprised of technology, management and policy. We also discuss inevitable risks from innovation, strategies to innovate while avoiding risks, and contexts underlying innovation and risks.
- Abramson, M. A., & Lawrence, P. R. (2001). The challenge of transforming organizations: Lessons learned about revitalizing organizations. In M. A. Abramson & P. R. Lawrence (Eds.), Transforming Organizations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Al-Hader, M., & Rodzi, A. (2009). The smart city infrastructure development & monitoring. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 4(2), 87--94.Google Scholar
- Al-Hader, M., Rodzi, A., Sharif, A. R., & Ahmad, N. (2009a). Smart city components architecture. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation, Brno, Czech Republic, September 7--9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Al-Hader, M., Rodzi, A., Sharif, A. R., & Ahmad, N. (2009b). SOA of smart city geospatial management. In Proceedings of the 3rd UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, Athens, Greece, November 25--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Altschuler, A., & Zegans, M. (1997). Innovation and public management: Notes from the state house and city hall. In A. Althschuler & R. Behn (Eds.), Innovation in American Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Amin, A., & Graham, S. (1997). The ordinary city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), 411--429.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management of Nations, Cities and Regions. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Athey, G., Nathan, M., Webber, C., & Mahroum, S. (2008). Innovation and the city. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 156--169.Google Scholar
- Bai, X., McAllister, R. R., Beaty, R. M., & Taylor, B. (2010). Urban policy and governance in a global environment: Complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 129--135.Google Scholar
- Banister, D., & Stead, D. (2002). Reducing transport intensity. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 2(3--4), 161--178.Google Scholar
- Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467--76.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Borja, J. (2007). Counterpoint: Intelligent cities and innovative cities. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) Papers: E-Journal on the Knowledge Society, 5. Available at http://www.uoc.edu/uocpapers/5/dt/eng/mitchell.pdf.Google Scholar
- Boulton, A., Brunn, S. D., & Devriendt, L. (2011). Cyberinfrastructures and "smart" world cities: Physical, human, and soft infrastructures. In P. Taylor, B. Derudder, M. Hoyler & F. Witlox (Eds.), International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Bradford, N. (2004). Place matters and multi-level governance: Perspectives on a new urban policy paradigm. Policy Options, 25(2), 39--45.Google Scholar
- Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L. (1998). Public sector information technology initiatives: Implications for programs of public administration. Administration & Society, 30(4), 421--442.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burke, W. W. (2002). Organizational Change: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Cairney, T., & Speak, G. (2000). Developing a 'Smart City': Understanding Information Technology Capacity and Establishing an Agenda for Change. Sydney, Australia: Centre for Regional Research and Innovation, University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
- Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Smart cities in Europe. In Proceedings of the 3rd Central European Conference in Regional Science, Košice, Slovak Republic, October 7--9.Google Scholar
- Cats-Baril, W. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Managing information technology projects in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 559--66.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christensen, T., & Læægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059--1066.Google Scholar
- City of Edinburgh Council. (2001). Delivering the Smart City: A 21st Century Government Action Plan. Available at http://download.edinburgh.gov.uk/smartcity/.Google Scholar
- Couchman, P. K., McLoughlin, I., & Charles, D. R. (2008). Lost in translation? Building science and innovation city strategies in Australia and the UK. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 211--223.Google Scholar
- Cresswell, A. M., Pardo, T. A., Canestraro, D. S., & Dawes, S. S. (2005). Why Assess Information Sharing Capability? Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government. Available at http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/guides/why_assess/why_assess.pdf.Google Scholar
- Cromer, C. (2010). Understanding Web 2.0's influences on public e-services: A protection motivation perspective. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 192--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cross, M. (2005). Public sector IT failures. Project, October, 48--52.Google Scholar
- Damanpour, F. (1993). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555--590.Google Scholar
- Dawes, S. S., Bloniarz, P. A., Kelly, K. L., & Fletcher, P. D. (1999). Some Assembly Required: Building a Digital Government for the 21st Century. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, State University of New York. Available at http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/some_assembly/some_assembly.pdf.Google Scholar
- Dawes, S. S., Cresswell, A. M., & Pardo, T. A. (2009). From "need to know" to "need to share": Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 392--402.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dawes, S. S., Pardo, T. A., Simon, S., Cresswell, A. M., LaVigne, M. F., Andersen, D. F., & Bloniarz, P. A. (2004). Making Smart IT Choices: Understanding Value and Risk in Government IT Investments (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government. Available at http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/guides/smartit2/smartit2.pdf.Google Scholar
- Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (1999). Leadership for Change: Case Studies in American Local Government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar
- Department of Finance and Deregulation. (2007). Business Process Interoperability Framework: Australian Government Information Management Office. Available at http://www.finance.gov.au/e-government/service-improvement-and-delivery/business-process-interoperability-framework.html.Google Scholar
- Dicken, P. (2003). Global Shifts: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century (4th ed.). London: Chapman.Google Scholar
- Dirks, S., Gurdgiev, C., & Keeling, M. (2010). Smarter Cities for Smarter Growth: How Cities Can Optimize Their Systems for the Talent-Based Economy. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services. Available at ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03348usen/GBE03348USEN.PDF.Google Scholar
- Dirks, S., & Keeling, M. (2009). A Vision of Smarter Cities: How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services. Available at ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03227usen/GBE03227USEN.PDF.Google Scholar
- Dirks, S., Keeling, M., & Dencik, J. (2009). How Smart is Your City?: Helping Cities Measure Progress. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services. Available at ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/gbe03248usen/GBE03248USEN.PDF.Google Scholar
- Dobbs, R., Smit, S., Remes, J., Manyika, J., Roxburgh, C., & Restrepo, A. (2011). Urban World: Mapping the Economic Power of Cities. McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
- Donovan, J., Kilfeather, E., & Buggy, F. M. (2008). eGovernment for innovative cities of the next generation: The ICING Project. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 293--302.Google Scholar
- Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. (2005). E-government adoption: Architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), 589--611.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eger, J. M. (2009). Smart growth, smart cities, and the crisis at the pump a worldwide phenomenon. I-Ways, 32(1), 47--53. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eger, J. M., & Maggipinto, A. (2010). Technology as a tool of transformation: e-Cities and the rule of law. In A. D'Atri & D. Saccà& D. Saccàà (Eds.), Information Systems: People, Organizations, Institutions, and Technologies (pp. 23--30). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Ewusi-Mensah, K., & Przasnyski, Z. H. (1991). On information systems project abandonment: An exploratory study of organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 67--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168--176.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frissen, P. (1997). The virtual state: Postmodernisation, informatisation and public administration. In B. D. Loader (Ed.), The Governance of Cyberspace (pp. 110--125). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Vienna, Austria: Centre of Regional Science (SRF), Vienna University of Technology. Available at http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf.Google Scholar
- Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart Cities Ranking: An Effective Instrument for the Positioning of Cities? ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 4(12), 7--25. Available at http://upcommons.upc.edu/revistes/bitstream/2099/8550/7/ACE_12_SA_10.pdf.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giffinger, R., Kramar, H., & Haindl, G. (2008). The role of rankings in growing city competition. In Proceedings of the 11th European Urban Research Association (EURA) Conference, Milan, Italy, October 9--11.Google Scholar
- Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187--216.Google Scholar
- Goldfinch, S. (2007). Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 917--929.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Bate, P., Kyriakadou, O., MacFarlane, F., & Peacock, R. (2004a). How to spread good ideas: A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, spread and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. London: National Health Service, Service Delivery & Organization Program.Google Scholar
- Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004b). Diffusion of innovations in service organisations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581--629.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2005). Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science and Medicine, 61(2), 417--430.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hall, R. E. (2000). The vision of a smart city. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris, France, September 28.Google Scholar
- Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27--34.Google Scholar
- Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18(2), 101--112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 410--420.Google Scholar
- Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303--320.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hospers, G.-J. (2008). Governance in innovative cities and the importance of branding. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 224--234.Google Scholar
- IBM. (2010). Smarter Thinking for a Smarter Planet. Available at http://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/global/files/us__en_us__loud__ibmlbn0041_transtasman_book.pdf.Google Scholar
- Iribarren, M., Concha, G., Valdes, G., Solar, M., Villarroel, M. T., Gutiérrez, P., & Váásquez, Á. (2008). Capability maturity framework for eGovernment: A multi-dimensional model and assessing tool. In M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl & E. Ferro (Eds.), Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, EGOV 2008 (Vol. 5184, pp. 136--147). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janssen, M., & Hjort-Madsen, K. (2007). Analyzing enterprise architecture in national governments: The cases of Denmark and the Netherlands. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-40), Waikoloa, Hawaii, January 3--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennings, P. (2010). Managing the risks of Smarter Planet solutions. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson, B. (2008). Cities, systems of innovation and economic development. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 146--155.Google Scholar
- Johnson, G., & Leavitt, W. (2001). Building on success: Transforming organizations through an appreciative inquiry. Public Personnel Management, 30(1), 129--136.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kanter, R. M., & Litow, S. S. (2009). Informed and interconnected: A manifesto for smarter cities. Harvard Business School General Management Unit Working Paper, 09--141. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1420236.Google Scholar
- Kramer, K. L. (2003, September 29). Information technology and administrative reform: Will the time after e-government be different? In Proceedings of the Heinrich Reinermann Schrift fest, Post Graduate School of Administration, Speyer, Germany.Google Scholar
- La Porte, T. M. (2005). Being good and doing well: Organizational openness and government effectiveness on the World Wide Web. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 31(3), 23--27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Han, J., & Leem, Y. (2008). Ubiquitous urban infrastructure: Infrastructure planning and development in Korea. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 282--292.Google Scholar
- Luke, B., Verreynne, M., & Kearins, K. (2010). Innovative and entrepreneurial activity in the public sector: The changing face of public sector institutions. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 138--153.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marceau, J. (2008). Introduction: Innovation in the city and innovative cities. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 136--145.Google Scholar
- Martin, R., & Simmie, J. (2008). Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 183--196.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, F., & Vickers, M. (2008). Digital natives, dropouts and refugees: Educational challenges for innovative cities. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 257--268.Google Scholar
- Mingardo, G. (2008). Cities and innovative urban transport policies. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 269--281.Google Scholar
- Misuraca, G. (2010). Exploring emerging ICT-enabled governance models in European cities: Institute for Prospective Technology Studies (IPTS), European Commission. Available at http://is.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/EAP/EXPGOV.html. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Misuraca, G., Ferro, E., & Caroleo, B. (2010). Assessing emerging ICT-enabled governance models in European cities: Results from a mapping survey. In M. A. Wimmer, J.-L. Chappelet, M. Janssen & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic Government: EGOV 2010 (Vol. 6228, pp. 168--179). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar
- Moon, M. J., & Norris, D. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 43--60.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovations in the Public Sector. London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
- Odendaal, N. (2003). Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27(6), 585--607.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paquet, G. (2001). Smart communities. LAC Carling Government's Review 3(5), 28--30.Google Scholar
- Pardo, T. A., & Burke, G. B. (2008). Government worth having: A briefing on interoperability for government leaders. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government, The Research Foundation of State University of New York. Available at http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/government_worth_having/government_worth_having.pdf.Google Scholar
- Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., & Burke, G. B. (forthcoming). E-government interoperability: Interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, DOI: 10.1177/0894439310392184. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paskaleva-Shapira, K. A. (2007). E-city Europe: Status, propositions, and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Ulm, Germany, September 24--25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paskaleva, K. A. (2009). Enabling the smart city: The progress of city e-governance in Europe. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), 405--422.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pinnegar, S., Marceau, J., & Randolph, B. (2008). Innovation for a carbon-constrained city: Challenges for the built environment industry. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 303--315.Google Scholar
- Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation research: What's next? Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 122--137.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Preissl, B., & Mueller, J. (Eds.). (2006). Governance of Communication Networks: Connecting Societies and Markets with IT. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(June), 155--169.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ross, J. W. (2003). Creating a strategic IT architecture competency: Learning in stages. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2(1), 31--43.Google Scholar
- Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Scholl, H. J. (2005). Interoperability in e-government: More than just smart middleware. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), Big Island, Hawaii, January 3--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scholl, H. J., & Klischewski, R. (2007). E-government integration and interoperability: Framing the research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(8/9), 889--920.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, A. C., & Taebel, D. A. (1985). Administrative innovation in municipal government. International Journal of Public Administration, 7(2), 149--177.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation management in context: Environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 169--183.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Toppeta, D. (2010). The Smart City Vision: How Innovation and ICT Can Build Smart, "Livable", Sustainable Cities: The Innovation Knowledge Foundation. Available at http://www.thinkinnovation.org/file/research/23/en/Toppeta_Report_005_2010.pdf.Google Scholar
- Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E-governance developments in EU cities: Reshaping government's relationship with citizens. Governance, 19(2), 272--302.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Torres, L., Pina, V., & Royo, S. (2005). E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms? Online Information Review, 29(5), 531--553.Google ScholarCross Ref
- van Winden, W. (2008). Urban governance in the knowledge-based economy: Challenges for different city types. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 197--210.Google Scholar
- Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., & Devece, C. A. (2011). Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 367--386.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2010). Helping CIOs Understand "Smart City" Initiatives: Defining the Smart City, Its Drivers, and the Role of the CIO. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research, Inc. Available at http://public.dhe.ibm.com/partnerworld/pub/smb/smarterplanet/forr_help_cios_und_smart_city_initiatives.pdf.Google Scholar
- Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334--349.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whittaker, B. (1999). What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects. Information Management & Computer Society, 7(1), 23--29.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, D. A., & Bramwell, A. (2008). Innovation, creativity and governance: Social dynamics of economic performance in city-regions. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2--3), 170--182.Google Scholar
- Yovanof, G. S., & Hazapis, G. N. (2009). An architectural framework and enabling wireless technologies for digital cities & intelligent urban environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 49(3), 445--463. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in Organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Zook, M. A., & Graham, M. (2007). Mapping digiplace: Geocoded Internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(3), 466--482.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy, and context
Recommendations
The Research and Co-creation Model for Urban Interaction Design and Practices
Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Cultural Heritage, Creativity and Social DevelopmentAbstractThe city is the basis of people’s life, carrying the behavior and interaction of residents every day. With the rapid development of information interaction technology, the city is paying more and more attention to Human-oriented and Human-Computer ...
Developing Smart Cities in China: An Empirical Analysis
This article describes how being pushed and pulled by a variety of external and internal factors, the Chinese government had begun to adopt and implement its smart city initiatives. Despite the strong financial and institutional supports from the ...
What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization
This study represents two critical steps forward in the area of smart city research and practice. The first is in the form of the development of a comprehensive conceptualization of smart city as a resource for researchers and government practitioners; the ...
Comments