skip to main content
research-article

Design science and the accumulation of knowledge in the information systems discipline

Published:10 April 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Design science has emerged as an important research paradigm in the information systems (IS) discipline, and much has been written on how it should be conducted and evaluated (e.g., Hevner et al. [2004]; Walls et al. [1992]; Vaishnavi and Kuechler [2007]; Kuechler and Vaishnavi [2008]; Peffers et al. [2007]; Iivari [2010]; Pigneur [2011]). We contend that, as a socio-technical discipline, IS research must address the interaction between design and behavior. We begin with a background discussion of what we mean by IS research and the nature of the relationship between design and behavioral approaches to IS research. We discuss the nature of design, design science, and IT artifacts within information systems research and describe the importance of linking design and behavioral perspectives. We illustrate several key points using selected articles recently published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems [Schmidt-Rauch and Schwabe 2011; Lau et al. 2011]. We conclude with a vision of IS research in which the capabilities and affordances of IT artifacts are incorporated into behavioral studies; the results of behavioral studies are utilized in the development and evaluation of IT artifacts; and both behavioral and design perspectives are used to address the important problems of our constituent community.

References

  1. Abbasi, A. and Chen, H. 2008. Cybergate: A design framework and system for text analysis of computer-mediated communication. MIS Quart. 32, 4, 811. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aboulafia, M. 1991. Philosophy, Social Theory, and the Thought of George Herbert Mead. SUNY Series in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. State University of New York Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Achinstein, P. 1968. Concepts of Science, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J. C., Gupta, A., and Kauffman, R. J. 2008. Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. MIS Quart. 32, 4, 779. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Agarwal, R. and Lucas, H. C., Jr. 2005. The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quart. 29, 3, 381--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Alter, S. 2003. 18 reasons why IT-reliant work systems should replace ‘the IT artifact’ as the core subject matter of the IS field. Comm. AIS 12, 365--394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, J., Avital, M., Davis, G., Land, F., Morgan, H., and Wetherbe, J. C. 2011. ICIS 2010 panel report: Technologies that transform business and research: Lessons from the past as we look to the future. Comm. AIS 28, 29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Baskerville, R. L. and Myers, M. D. 2002. Information systems as a reference discipline, MIS Quart. 26, 1, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Belcher, L. W. and Watson, H. J. 1993. Assessing the value of Conoco's EIS. MIS Quart. 16, 3, 239--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. 2003. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quart. 27, 2, 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. W. 1999. Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. MIS Quart. 23, 1, 3--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Boland, R. J. and Collopy, F. 2004. Managing as Designing. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bostrom, R. P. and Heinen, J. S. 1977a. MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective—part I: The causes. MIS Quart. 1, 3, 17--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bostrom, R. P. and Heinen, J. S. 1977b. MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective, part II—The application of socio-technical theory. MIS Quart. 1, 4, 11--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Brooks, F. P., Jr. 1987. No silver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering. IEEE Computer 20, 4, 10--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bunge, M. A. 1985. Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Vol. 7 Epistemology & Methodology III: Philosophy of Science and Technology, Part II: Life Science, Social Science and Technology, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, H. 2011. Editorial: Design science, grand challenges, and societal impacts. ACM Trans. Manag. Info. Syst. 2, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., and Yoo, Y. 2010. The impact of information technology and systems: Transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance—A field study. MIS Quart. 34, 4, 855--870. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Denning, P. J. 1997. A new social contract for research. Comm. ACM 40, 2, 132--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Derrick, D., Jenkins, J., and Numamaker, J. 2011. Design principles for special purpose, embodied, conversational intelligence with environmental sensors (SPECIES) agents. AIS Trans. Human-Comput. Interact. 3, 2, 62--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Dunbar, R. L. M. and Starbuck, W. H. 2006. Learning to design organizations and learning from designing them. Org. Science. 17, 2, 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Erickson, J., Lyytinen, K., and Siau, K. 2005. Agile modeling, agile software development, and extreme programming: The state of research. J. Datab. Manag. 16, 4, 88--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Faraj, S. and Sproull, L. 2000. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Manag. Science 46, 12, 1554--1568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fuller, R. B. 1992. Cosmography: A Posthumous Scenario for the Future of Humanity. A. K. Kuromiya, Ed., Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodhue, D. and Thompson, R. 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gregor, S. 2006. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quart. 30, 3, 611--642. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Gregor, S. and Jones, D. 2007. The anatomy of a design theory. J. AIS 8, 5, 312--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Harter, D. E., Krishnan, M. S., and Slaughter, S. A. 2000. Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Manag. Science 46, 4, 451--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Haynes, S. R. and Carroll, J. M. 2010. The range and role of theory in information systems design research: From concepts to construction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems. Paper 136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hevner, A., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. Design science research in information systems. MIS Quart. 28, 1, 75--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hevner, A. R. 2007. A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinav. J. Info. Syst. 19, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirschheim, R. and Heinz, K. 2010. A short and glorious history of the information systems field. J. AIS Info. Syst.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Holmström, J. and Truex, D. 2011. Dropping your tools: Exploring when and how theories can serve as blinders in IS research. Comm. AIS Info. Syst. 28, 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Houghton, R., el Sawy, O., Gray, P., Donegan, C., and Joshi, A. 2004. Vigilant information systems for managing enterprises in dynamic supply chains: Realtime dashboards at western digital. MIS Quart. Exec. 3, 1, 19--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Iivari, J. 2010. Twelve theses on design science research in information systems. Design Res. Info. Syst. 22, 43--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Järvinen, P. 2007. Action research is similar to design science. Quality Quantity. 41, 37--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Kaza, S., Hu, P. J.-H., Hu, H.-F., and Chen, H. 2011. Designing, implementing, and evaluating information systems for law enforcement—A long-term design-science research project. Comm. AIS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuechler, W. and Vaishnavi, V. K. 2008. On theory development in design science research: Anatomy of a research project. Euro. J. Info. Syst. 17, 5, 489--504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Larsen, T. J., Niederman, F., Limayem, M., and Chan, J. 2009. The role of modeling in achieving information systems success: UML to the rescue? Info. Syst. J. 19, 1, 83--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Lau, R. Y. K., Liao, S. Y., Kwok, R. C.-W., Xu, K., Xia, Y., and Li, Y. 2011. Text mining and probabilistic language modeling for online review spam detection. ACM Trans. Manag. Info. Syst. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lee, A. 1999. Inaugural editor's comments. MIS Quart. 23, 1, v--xi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee, H. and Choi, B. 2003. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. J. Manag. Info. Syst. 20, 1, 179--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Lee, J., Wyner, G. M., and Pentland, B. T. 2008. Process grammar as a tool for business process design. MIS Quart. 32, 4, 757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Liu, D., Sarkar, S., and Sriskandarajah, C. 2010. An optimal resource allocation policy for personalization in content delivery sites. Info. Syst. Res. 21, 227--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. March, S. T. and Story, V. C. 2008. Design science in the information systems discipline: An introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Quart. 32, 4, 725--730. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. March, S. T. and Smith, G. 1995. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Syst. 15, 4, 251--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., and Gasser, L. 2002. A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quart. 26, 3, 179--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., and Gurbaxani, V. 2004. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of it business value. MIS Quart. 28, 2, 283--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Menon, S., Sarkar, S., and Mukherjee, S. 2005. Maximizing accuracy of shared databases when concealing sensitive patterns. Info. Syst. Res. 16, 3, 256--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Mishra, A. N. and Agarwal, R. 2010. Technological frames, organizational capabilities, and IT use: An empirical investigation of electronic procurement. Info. Syst. Res. 21, 2, 249--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Nunamaker, J. F., Briggs, R. O., Mittleman, D. D., Vogel, D. R., and Balthazard, P. A. 1996. Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. J. Manag. Info. Syst. 13, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Orlikowski, W. J. and Iacono, C. S. 2001. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Info. Syst. Res. 12, 2, 121--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Orman, L. V. 2002. Electronic markets, hierarchies, hubs, and intermediaries. J. Info. Syst. Frontiers 4, 2, 207--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., and Loos, P. 2010. Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. Euro. J. Info. Syst. 20, 7--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Parsons, J. and Wand, Y. 2008. Using cognitive principles to guide classification in information systems modeling. MIS Quart. 32, 4, 839. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Info. Syst. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Pigneur, Y. 2011. Design science research in information systems. Comm. 22, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Popper, K. R. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Harper and Row, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Pries-Heje, J. and Baskerville, R. 2008. The design theory nexus. MIS Quart. 32, 4, 731. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Romme, A. G. L. 2003. Making a difference: Organization as design. Org. Science. 14, 5, 558--573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Schmidt-Rauch, S. and Schwabe, G. 2011. From telesales to tele-advisory in travel agencies: business problems, generic design goals and requirements. ACM Trans. Manag. Info. Syst. 2, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Searle, J. R. 2010. Making the Social World. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. Action design research. MIS Quart. 35, 1, 37--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Simon, H. A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial 3rd Ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Tawarmalani, M., Kannan, K., and De, P. 2009. Allocating objects in a network of caches: Centralized and decentralized analyses. Manag. Science 55, 1, 132--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Vaishnavi, V. and Kuechler, W. 2004. Design science research in information systems. www.desrist.org/design-research-in-information-systems/(Last accessed 9/11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Vaishnavi, V. K. and Kuechler, W. 2007. Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, FL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, F. D., and Davis, G. B. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27, 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., and el Sawy, O. A. 1992. Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Info. Syst. Res. 3, 1, 36--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., and El Sawy, O. A. 2004. Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 initial rendition? J. Info. Technol. Theor. Application 6, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Weber, R. 2003. Editor's comments: Still desperately seeking the IT artifact. MIS Quart. 27, 2, iii--xi. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Weber, R. 1997. Ontological foundations of information systems. Coopers & Lybrand, Accounting Research Methodology Monograph No. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Winograd, T. 2006. Shifting viewpoints: Artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction. Artif. Intell. 170, 1256--1258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Winter, R. 2008. Design science research in Europe. Euro. J. Info. Syst. 17, 470--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design science and the accumulation of knowledge in the information systems discipline

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
            ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 3, Issue 1
            April 2012
            119 pages
            ISSN:2158-656X
            EISSN:2158-6578
            DOI:10.1145/2151163
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 10 April 2012
            • Accepted: 1 January 2012
            • Revised: 1 November 2011
            • Received: 1 September 2011
            Published in tmis Volume 3, Issue 1

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader