ABSTRACT
Daily deals sites such as Groupon offer deeply discounted goods and services to tens of millions of customers through geographically targeted daily e-mail marketing campaigns. In our prior work we observed that a negative side effect for merchants selling Groupons is that, on average, their Yelp ratings decline significantly. However, this previous work was primarily observational, rather than explanatory. In this work, we rigorously consider and evaluate various hypotheses about underlying consumer and merchant behavior in order to understand this phenomenon, which we dub the Groupon effect. We use statistical analysis and mathematical modeling, leveraging a dataset we collected spanning tens of thousands of daily deals and over 7 million Yelp reviews. We investigate hypotheses such as whether Groupon subscribers are more critical than their peers, whether Groupon users are experimenting with services and merchants outside their usual sphere, or whether some fraction of Groupon merchants provide significantly worse service to customers using Groupons. We suggest an additional novel hypothesis: reviews from Groupon users are lower on average because such reviews correspond to real, unbiased customers, while the body of reviews on Yelp contain some fraction of reviews from biased or even potentially fake sources. Although our focus is quite specific, our work provides broader insights into both consumer and merchant behavior within the daily deals marketplace.
- ANSARI, A., ESSEGAIER, S., AND KOHLI, R. 2000. Internet recommendation systems. Journal of Marketing Research 37, 3, 363--375.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ARABSHAHI, A. 2010. Undressing Groupon: An Analysis of the Groupon Business Model. Available at http://www.ahmadalia.com.Google Scholar
- BAWA, K. AND SHOEMAKER, R. 1987. The coupon-prone consumer: some findings based on purchase behavior across product classes. Journal of Marketing, 99--110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- BYERS, J. W., MITZENMACHER, M., AND ZERVAS, G. 2012. Daily Deals: Prediction, Social Diffusion, and Reputational Ramifications. In The Fifth ACM WSDM Conference. Seattle, WA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- CAO, Y. AND GRUCA, T. 2005. Reducing adverse selection through customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 219--229.Google ScholarCross Ref
- CHEVALIER, J. A. AND MAYZLIN, D. 2003. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Working Paper 10148, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- DELLAROCAS, C. AND NARAYAN, R. 2006. A statistical measure of a populations propensity to engage in post-purchase online word-of-mouth. Statistical Science 21, 2, 277--285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DHOLAKIA, U. M. 2010. How Effective are Groupon Promotions for Businesses? Available at http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~dholakia.Google Scholar
- DODSON, J., TYBOUT, A., AND STERNTHAL, B. 1978. Impact of deals and deal retraction on brand switching. Journal of Marketing Research, 72--81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- EDELMAN, B., JAFFE, S., AND KOMINERS, S. D. 2010. To Groupon or Not to Groupon: The Profitability of Deep Discounts. HBS Working Paper Number 11-063: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6597.html.Google Scholar
- ENGEL, J., KOLLAT, D., AND ROGER, D. 1973. Blackwell, consumer behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- GHOSE, A. AND IPEIROTIS, P. 2010. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 23, 10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- GLADWELL, M. 2000. The Tipping Point. Little Brown.Google Scholar
- GODES, D. AND SILVA, J. 2011. Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science. Google ScholarDigital Library
- HAUSMAN, J., LO, A., AND MACKINLAY, A. 1992. An ordered probit analysis of transaction stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics 31, 3, 319--379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- INMAN, J. J. AND MCALISTER, L. 1994. Do coupon expiration dates affect consumer behavior? Journal of Marketing Research 31, 3, pp. 423--428.Google ScholarCross Ref
- LUCA, M. 2011. Reviews, Reputation, and Revenues: The Case of Yelp.com. HBS Working Paper Number 12-016: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6833.html.Google Scholar
- MCKELVEY, R. D. AND ZAVOINA, W. 1975. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4, 1, 103--120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- MOE, W. AND SCHWEIDEL, D. 2011. Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation and evolution. Marketing Science. Google ScholarDigital Library
- RAJU, J. 1992. The effect of price promotions on variability in product category sales. Marketing Science, 207--220.Google Scholar
- SHAFFER, G. AND ZHANG, Z. 1995. Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Science, 395--416.Google Scholar
- SY, H., FAMINOW, M., JOHNSON, G., AND CROW, G. 1997. Estimating the values of cattle characteristics using an ordered probit model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 463--476.Google Scholar
- Techcrunch 2011. Valentine's Day Bait & Switch: Groupon Must Avoid Becoming Just Another Useless Coupon Site. Available at http://t.co/o5kfveu.Google Scholar
- TERZA, J. 1985. Ordinal probit: a generalization. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 14, 1, 1--11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- WU, F. AND HUBERMAN, B. 2008. How public opinion forms. Internet and Network Economics, 334--341. Google ScholarDigital Library
- YEE, T. 2010. The VGAM package for categorical data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 32, 10, 1--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- YELP WEB BLOG. 2010. Yelp's Review Filter Explained. http://officialblog.yelp.com/2010/03/yelp-review-filter-explained.html.Google Scholar
- YING, Y., FEINBERG, F., AND WEDEL, M. 2006. Leveraging missing ratings to improve online recommendation systems. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 3, 355--365.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The groupon effect on yelp ratings: a root cause analysis
Recommendations
Groupon and Groupon Now: Participating Firm's Profitability Analysis
The business model of Groupon has been categorized by many to be a case of daily deals or discount offerings to consumers. It is static (not responsive to business fluctuations and demands) and operates in batch mode (period-based availability). "...
The daily deals marketplace: empirical observations and managerial implications
The emergence of the daily deals online marketplace has been an e-commerce phenomenon that has engendered remarkable stories of rapid growth, exemplified by firms such as Groupon and Living Social. At the same time, critics have accumulated considerable ...
Relationships Among Minimum Requirements, Facebook Likes, and Groupon Deal Outcomes
Daily deal coupons have gained a prominent foothold on the web. The earliest and largest player is Groupon. Originally, Groupon deals were a mix of deals with a minimum requirement (MR) of coupon sales before a deal became effective and of deals without ...
Comments