skip to main content
10.1145/2229012.2229034acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The groupon effect on yelp ratings: a root cause analysis

Published:04 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Daily deals sites such as Groupon offer deeply discounted goods and services to tens of millions of customers through geographically targeted daily e-mail marketing campaigns. In our prior work we observed that a negative side effect for merchants selling Groupons is that, on average, their Yelp ratings decline significantly. However, this previous work was primarily observational, rather than explanatory. In this work, we rigorously consider and evaluate various hypotheses about underlying consumer and merchant behavior in order to understand this phenomenon, which we dub the Groupon effect. We use statistical analysis and mathematical modeling, leveraging a dataset we collected spanning tens of thousands of daily deals and over 7 million Yelp reviews. We investigate hypotheses such as whether Groupon subscribers are more critical than their peers, whether Groupon users are experimenting with services and merchants outside their usual sphere, or whether some fraction of Groupon merchants provide significantly worse service to customers using Groupons. We suggest an additional novel hypothesis: reviews from Groupon users are lower on average because such reviews correspond to real, unbiased customers, while the body of reviews on Yelp contain some fraction of reviews from biased or even potentially fake sources. Although our focus is quite specific, our work provides broader insights into both consumer and merchant behavior within the daily deals marketplace.

References

  1. ANSARI, A., ESSEGAIER, S., AND KOHLI, R. 2000. Internet recommendation systems. Journal of Marketing Research 37, 3, 363--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. ARABSHAHI, A. 2010. Undressing Groupon: An Analysis of the Groupon Business Model. Available at http://www.ahmadalia.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BAWA, K. AND SHOEMAKER, R. 1987. The coupon-prone consumer: some findings based on purchase behavior across product classes. Journal of Marketing, 99--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. BYERS, J. W., MITZENMACHER, M., AND ZERVAS, G. 2012. Daily Deals: Prediction, Social Diffusion, and Reputational Ramifications. In The Fifth ACM WSDM Conference. Seattle, WA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. CAO, Y. AND GRUCA, T. 2005. Reducing adverse selection through customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 219--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. CHEVALIER, J. A. AND MAYZLIN, D. 2003. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Working Paper 10148, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. DELLAROCAS, C. AND NARAYAN, R. 2006. A statistical measure of a populations propensity to engage in post-purchase online word-of-mouth. Statistical Science 21, 2, 277--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. DHOLAKIA, U. M. 2010. How Effective are Groupon Promotions for Businesses? Available at http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~dholakia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. DODSON, J., TYBOUT, A., AND STERNTHAL, B. 1978. Impact of deals and deal retraction on brand switching. Journal of Marketing Research, 72--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. EDELMAN, B., JAFFE, S., AND KOMINERS, S. D. 2010. To Groupon or Not to Groupon: The Profitability of Deep Discounts. HBS Working Paper Number 11-063: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6597.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ENGEL, J., KOLLAT, D., AND ROGER, D. 1973. Blackwell, consumer behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. GHOSE, A. AND IPEIROTIS, P. 2010. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 23, 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. GLADWELL, M. 2000. The Tipping Point. Little Brown.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. GODES, D. AND SILVA, J. 2011. Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. HAUSMAN, J., LO, A., AND MACKINLAY, A. 1992. An ordered probit analysis of transaction stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics 31, 3, 319--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. INMAN, J. J. AND MCALISTER, L. 1994. Do coupon expiration dates affect consumer behavior? Journal of Marketing Research 31, 3, pp. 423--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. LUCA, M. 2011. Reviews, Reputation, and Revenues: The Case of Yelp.com. HBS Working Paper Number 12-016: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6833.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. MCKELVEY, R. D. AND ZAVOINA, W. 1975. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4, 1, 103--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. MOE, W. AND SCHWEIDEL, D. 2011. Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation and evolution. Marketing Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. RAJU, J. 1992. The effect of price promotions on variability in product category sales. Marketing Science, 207--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. SHAFFER, G. AND ZHANG, Z. 1995. Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Science, 395--416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. SY, H., FAMINOW, M., JOHNSON, G., AND CROW, G. 1997. Estimating the values of cattle characteristics using an ordered probit model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 463--476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Techcrunch 2011. Valentine's Day Bait & Switch: Groupon Must Avoid Becoming Just Another Useless Coupon Site. Available at http://t.co/o5kfveu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. TERZA, J. 1985. Ordinal probit: a generalization. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 14, 1, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. WU, F. AND HUBERMAN, B. 2008. How public opinion forms. Internet and Network Economics, 334--341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. YEE, T. 2010. The VGAM package for categorical data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 32, 10, 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. YELP WEB BLOG. 2010. Yelp's Review Filter Explained. http://officialblog.yelp.com/2010/03/yelp-review-filter-explained.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. YING, Y., FEINBERG, F., AND WEDEL, M. 2006. Leveraging missing ratings to improve online recommendation systems. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 3, 355--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The groupon effect on yelp ratings: a root cause analysis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EC '12: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
      June 2012
      1016 pages
      ISBN:9781450314152
      DOI:10.1145/2229012

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate664of2,389submissions,28%

      Upcoming Conference

      EC '24
      The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      July 8 - 11, 2024
      New Haven , CT , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader