ABSTRACT
This paper proposes that Social Learning Analytics (SLA) can be usefully thought of as a subset of learning analytics approaches. SLA focuses on how learners build knowledge together in their cultural and social settings. In the context of online social learning, it takes into account both formal and informal educational environments, including networks and communities. The paper introduces the broad rationale for SLA by reviewing some of the key drivers that make social learning so important today. Five forms of SLA are identified, including those which are inherently social, and others which have social dimensions. The paper goes on to describe early work towards implementing these analytics on SocialLearn, an online learning space in use at the UK's Open University, and the challenges that this is raising. This work takes an iterative approach to analytics, encouraging learners to respond to and help to shape not only the analytics but also their associated recommendations.
- Campbell, J. P., DeBlois, P. B. and Oblinger, D. G., Academic Analytics: A New Tool for a New Era. EDUCAUSE Review, 42, 4 (July/August), (2007), 40--57.Google Scholar
- Norris, D., Baer, L., Leonard, J., Pugliese, L. and Lefrere, P., Action analytics: measuring and improving performance that matters in higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 43, 1, (2008).Google Scholar
- Wells, G. and Claxton, G., Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. In: G. Wells and G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for Life in the 21st Century. Blackwell, Oxford, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wertsch, J. V., Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, 1991.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P., Thinking, learning and reading: the situated sociocultural mind. In: D. Kirshner and J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: social, semiotic and psychological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, 1997.Google Scholar
- Inglehart, R., Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1997.Google Scholar
- Savage, C. M., Fifth Generation Management: Co-Creating through Virtual Enterprising, Dynamic Teaming, and Knowledge Networking. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996.Google Scholar
- Lyotard, J. F., The Postmodern Condition. Manchester University Press, manchester, 1979.Google Scholar
- Claxton, G., Education for the learning age: a sociocultural approach to learning to learn. In: G. Wells and G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for Life in the 21st Century. Blackwell, Oxford, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Futurelab, Developing and Accrediting Personal Skills and Competencies. 2007. http://archive.futurelab.org.ukGoogle Scholar
- Qualifications & Curriculum Authority, Futures: Meeting the Challenge. 2007. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5529Google Scholar
- Willinsky, J., Just say know? Schooling the knowledge society. Educational Theory, 55, 1, (2005), 97--111.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hagel, J., Seely Brown, J. and Davison, L., The Power of Pull. Basic Books, New York, 2010.Google Scholar
- Jones, C. and Steeples, C., Perspectives and issues in networked learning. In: C. Steeples and C. Jones (Eds.), Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. Centre for Studies in Advanced Learning Technology, Lancaster, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Granovetter, M. S., The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6, (1973), 1360--1380.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Levin, D. Z. and Cross, R., The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 11, (2004), 1477--1490. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haythornthwaite, C. and de Laat, M., Social networks and learning networks: using social network perspectives to understand social learning. In: 7th International Conference on Networked Learning (Aalborg, Denmark (3-4 May), 3--4 May, 2010)Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P., Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. Routledge, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
- Goodfellow, R., Virtual Learning Communities: A Report for the National College for School Leadership. 2003. http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/document.cfm?docid=2778Google Scholar
- Cetina, K. K., Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies Theory, Culture & Society, 14, 4, (1997), 1--30.Google Scholar
- Schrire, S., Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing. Instructional Science, 32, 6, (2004), 475--502.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lapadat, J. C., Discourse devices used to establish community, increase coherence, and negotiate agreement in an online university course. The Journal of Distance Education, 21, 3, (2007), 59--92.Google Scholar
- O'Halloran, K., Investigating argumentatio in reading groups: combining manual qualitative coding and automated corpus analysis tools. Applied Linguistics, 32, 2, (2011), 172--196.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mercer, N., Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 2, (2004), 137--168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mercer, N., The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk amongst Teachers and Learners. Multilingual Matters Ltd, Clevedon, 1995.Google Scholar
- Mercer, N., Words & Minds: How We Use Language To Think Together. Routledge, London, 2000.Google Scholar
- Mercer, N. and Littleton, K., Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking. Routledge, London and New York, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mercer, N. and Wegerif, R., Is 'exploratory talk' productive talk? In: P. Light and K. Littleton (Eds.), Learning with Computers: Analysing Productive Interaction. Routledge, London and New York, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ferguson, R. and Buckingham Shum, S., Learning analytics to identify exploratory dialogue within synchronous text chat. Proc. 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (Banff, 27 Mar-1 Apr, 2011). ACM: NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ferguson, R., The Construction of Shared Knowledge through Asynchronous Dialogue. PhD, The Open University, Milton Keynes. http://oro.open.ac.uk/19908 2009.Google Scholar
- De Liddo, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Quinto, I., Bachler, M. and Cannavacciuolo, L., Discourse-centric learning analytics. Proc. 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (Banff, 27 Mar-1 Apr, 2011). ACM: NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Potter, W. J. and Levine-Donnerstein, D., Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 3, (1999), 258--285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Little, S., Llorente, A. and Rüger, S., An overview of evaluation campaigns in multimedia retrieval. In: H. Müller, P. Clough, T. Deselaers and B. Caputo (Eds.), ImageCLEF: Experimental Evaluation in Visual Information Retrieval. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Little, S., Ferguson, R. and Rutger, S., Navigating and Discovering Educational Materials through Visual Similarity Search. Proc. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA) (Lisbon, Portugal, 27 June - 1 July, 2011).Google Scholar
- Clow, D. and Makriyannis, E., iSpot Analysed: Participatory Learning and Reputation. Proc. 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (Banff, 27 Mar-1 Apr, 2011). ACM: NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- de Wever, B., Schellens, T., Vallcke, M. and van Keer, H., Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: a review. Computers & Education, 46, 1, (2006), 6--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jovanovic, J., Gaševic, D., Brooks, C., Devedžic, V., Hatala, M., Eap, T. and Richards, G., LOCO-Analyst: semantic web technologies in learning content usage analysis. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning 18, 1, (2008), 54--76.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deakin Crick, R., Learning how to learn: the dynamic assessment of learning power. The Curriculum Journal, 18, 2, (2007), 135--153.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deakin Crick, R., Broadfoot, P. and Claxton, G., Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: the ELLI project. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11, 3, (2004), 247--272.Google Scholar
- Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. and Ecclestone, K., Should We Be Using Learning Styles? What Research Has To Say to Practice. Learning and Skills Research Centre, London, 2004.Google Scholar
- Buckingham Shum, S. and Deakin Crick, R., Learning Dispositions and Transferable Competencies: Pedagogy, Modelling and Learning Analytics. Proc. 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (Vancouver, 29 Apr-2 May, 2012). ACM Press: NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anderson, E. M. and Shannon, A. L., Towards a conceptualisation of mentoring. In: T. Kerry and A. S. Mayes (Eds.), Issues in mentoring. Routledge, London, 1995.Google Scholar
- Ferguson, R., The Integration of Interaction on Distance-Learning Courses. MSc (RMet) Dissertation, The Open University, Milton Keynes, 2005.Google Scholar
- Vavoula, G., KLeOS: A Knowledge and Learning Organisation System in Support of Lifelong Learning. PhD, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 2004.Google Scholar
- Sharples, M., Taylor, J. and Vavoula, G., Towards a Theory of Mobile Learning. In: mLearn 2005 conference (Cape Town, South Africa, 2005).Google Scholar
- Jones, A. and Preece, J., Online communities for teachers and lifelong learners: a framework for comparing similarities and identifying differences in communities of practice and communities of interest. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2, 2--3, (2006), 112--137. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lipman, M., Thinking in Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wenger, E., Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ferguson, R. and Buckingham Shum, S., Towards a social learning space for open educational resources. In: A. Okada, T. Connolly and P. Scott (Eds.), Collaborative Learning 2.0 - Open Educational Resources. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2012, in press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bakharia, A., Heathcote, E. and Dawson, S., Social networks adapting pedagogical practice: SNAPP. In: Same Places, Different Spaces. ascilite 2009 (Auckland, 2009).Google Scholar
- Haythornthwaite, C., Learning relations and networks in web-based communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 4, 2, (2008), 140--158. Google ScholarDigital Library
- De Liddo, A., Sándor, A. and Buckingham Shum, S., Contested Collective Intelligence: Rationale, Technologies, and a Human-Machine Annotation Study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (2012, in press). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Novak, J. D., Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah: NJ, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N. and McLaren, B. M., Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation, 5, 1, (2010), 43--102.Google Scholar
- Edwards, C., Embedding reflective thinking on approaches to learning - moving from pilot study to developing institutional good practice. In: 16th Annual Conference of the Education, Learning Styles, Individual Differences Network (29 June-1 July) (Antwerp, 2011)Google Scholar
- Ferguson, R., Buckingham Shum, S. and Deakin Crick, R., EnquiryBlogger -- Using Widgets To Support Awareness and Reflection in a PLE Setting. In: 1st Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Personal Learning Environments in conjunction with the PLE Conference 2011. July 11 (Southampton, United Kingdom, 2011)Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Social learning analytics: five approaches
Recommendations
Learning dispositions and transferable competencies: pedagogy, modelling and learning analytics
LAK '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and KnowledgeTheoretical and empirical evidence in the learning sciences substantiates the view that deep engagement in learning is a function of a complex combination of learners' identities, dispositions, values, attitudes and skills. When these are fragile, ...
Epistemology, pedagogy, assessment and learning analytics
LAK '13: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and KnowledgeThere is a well-established literature examining the relationships between epistemology (the nature of knowledge), pedagogy (the nature of learning and teaching), and assessment. Learning Analytics (LA) is a new assessment technology and should engage ...
Crowd-sourced learning in MOOCs: learning analytics meets measurement theory
LAK '15: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And KnowledgeThis paper illustrated the promise of the combination of measurement theory and learning analytics for understanding effective MOOC learning. It reports findings from a study of whether and how MOOC log file data can assist in understanding how MOOC ...
Comments