skip to main content
10.1145/2330601.2330629acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning dispositions and transferable competencies: pedagogy, modelling and learning analytics

Published:29 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Theoretical and empirical evidence in the learning sciences substantiates the view that deep engagement in learning is a function of a complex combination of learners' identities, dispositions, values, attitudes and skills. When these are fragile, learners struggle to achieve their potential in conventional assessments, and critically, are not prepared for the novelty and complexity of the challenges they will meet in the workplace, and the many other spheres of life which require personal qualities such as resilience, critical thinking and collaboration skills. To date, the learning analytics research and development communities have not addressed how these complex concepts can be modelled and analysed, and how more traditional social science data analysis can support and be enhanced by learning analytics. We report progress in the design and implementation of learning analytics based on a research validated multidimensional construct termed "learning power". We describe, for the first time, a learning analytics infrastructure for gathering data at scale, managing stakeholder permissions, the range of analytics that it supports from real time summaries to exploratory research, and a particular visual analytic which has been shown to have demonstrable impact on learners. We conclude by summarising the ongoing research and development programme and identifying the challenges of integrating traditional social science research, with learning analytics and modelling.

References

  1. Bowker, G. C. and Star, L. S. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Pirolli, P. and Russell, D. M. Special Issue on Sensemaking. Human-Computer Interaction, 26, 1, (2011), 1--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Lovett, M., Meyer, O. and Thille, C. The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 14, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hsiao, I. H., Sosnovsky, S. and Brusilovsky, P. Guiding students to the right questions: adaptive navigation support in an E-Learning system for Java programming. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 4, (2010), 270--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Romero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M. and Baker, R. S. J. d. Handbook of Educational Data Mining. CRC Press. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Haste, H. Ambiguity, autonomy and agency. OECD, Hogreffe and Huber. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaros, M. and Deakin Crick, R. Personalised Learning in the Post Mechanical Age. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39, 4, (2007), 423--440.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hoskins, B. and Deakin Crick, R. Competencies for Learning to Learn and Active Citizenship: different currencies or the same coin? Joint Reserach Centre European Commission, Ispra, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauman, Z. The Individualized Society. Polity Cambridge Press., Cambridge, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Thomas, D., Brown, J. S. Learning for a World of Constant Change: Homo Sapiens, Homo Faber & Homo Ludens Revisited. In Proceedings of the University Research for Innovation: Proc. 7th Glion Colloquium (Montreux, Switzerland, 2009). Economica.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Heath and Co, Boston, 1933.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilby, N., Hamlyn, B., Hanson, T., Romanou, E., Mackey, T., Clark, J., Trikka, N. and Harrison, M. National Survey of Parents and Children: Family Life, Aspirations and Engagement with Learning in 2008. UK Dept. Children, Schools & Families, London, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Willms, J. D., Friesen, S. and Milton, P. What did you do in school today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic, and intellectual engagement. First National Report, Canadian Education Association, Toronto, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yazzie-Mintz, E. Charting the Path from Engagement to Achievement: A Report on the 2009 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Center for Evaluation & Education Policy, Indiana University, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Deakin Crick, R. Pedagogical challenges for personalisation: integrating the personal with the public through context-driven enquiry. Curriculum Journal, 20, 3, (2009), 185--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gardner, H. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books, New York, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Perkins, D., Jay, E. & Tishman S. Beyond Abilities: A Dispositional Theory of Thinking,. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 1, (1993), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Claxton, G. Wise Up: Learning to Live the Learning Life. Network Educational Press, Stafford, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Katz, L. Dispositions in Early Childhood Education. ERIC/EECE Bulletin, 18, 2, (1985), 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ames, C. The enhancement of student motivation. JAI Press. 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ames, C. Developing a Learning Orientation. 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Dweck, C. Self Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development. Philadelphia, PA., Psychology Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nicholls, J. Achievement Motivation: Conceptions of Ability Subjective Experience, Task, Choice and Performance. Psychological Review, 91, (1984), 328--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Nicholls, J. and Miller, A. The differentiation of the concepts of difficulty and ability. Child Development, 54, (1983), 961--969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Perkins, D., Jay, E. & Tishman S. New Conceptions of Thinking: From Ontology to Education,. Educational Psychology, 28, 1, (1993), 67--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ritchhart, R. and Perkins, D. Life in the Mindful Classroom: Nurturing the Disposition of Mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 1, (2000), 27--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Tishman, S., Jay, E. and Perkins, D. Teaching Thinking Dispositions: From Transmission to Enculturation,. Theory into Practice, 32, (1993), 147--153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Deakin Crick, R., Broadfoot, P. and Claxton, G. Developing an Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory: The ELLI Project. Assessment in Education, 11, 3, (2004), 248--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Claxton, G. Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind: Why Intelligence Increases when You Think Less,. Fourth Estate, London, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Claxton, G. Wise Up: The Challenge of Lifelong Learning,. Bloomsbury, London, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Millner, N., Small, T. and Deakin Crick, R. Learning by Accident. Report No. 1, ViTaL Development and Research Programme, University of Bristol, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Deakin Crick, R. and Grushka, K. Signs, Symbols and Metaphor: linking self with text in inquiry based learning. Curriculum Journal, 21, 1, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Deakin Crick, R. Learning how to learn: the dynamic assessment of learning power. The Curriculum Journal, 18, 2, (2007), 135--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Deakin Crick, R., Broadfoot, P. and Claxton, G. Developing an Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory: The ELLI Project. Lifelong Learning Foundation, Bristol, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Deakin Crick, R. and Yu, G. The Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory (ELLI): is it valid and reliable as a measurement tool? Education Research, 50, 4, (2008), 387--402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ren, K. Could Do Better! So Why Not? An Exploration of the Learning Dispositions of Underachieving Students. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Deakin Crick, R., Jelfs, H., Ren, K. and Symonds, J. Learning Futures. Paul Hamlyn Foundation, London, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Small, T. Learning Outside the Box. Report No. 3, ViTaL Development and Research Programme, University of Bristol, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Small, T. The Learning Agents! Report No. 4, ViTaL Development and Research Programme, University of Bristol, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Small, T. and Burn, M. The Learning Engineers: Bridging Values and Learning Report No. 2, ViTaL Development and Research Programme, University of Bristol, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Small, T. and Deakin Crick, R. Learning and Self-Awareness: An Enquiry into Personal Development in Higher Education. ViTaL Development and Research Programme, University of Bristol, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Deakin Crick, R. and Bond, T. 'It's like a Gift: How to get a long life easier': Narratives of Personalisation. Cambridge Journal of Education, submitted, (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Deakin Crick, R. Inquiry-based learning: reconciling the personal with the public in a democratic and archaeological pedagogy. Curriculum Journal, 20, 1, (2009), 73--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Deakin Crick, R. Inquiry-based learning: reconciling the personal with the public in a democratic and archaeological pedagogy. Curriculum Journal, 20, 1, (2009), 73--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Grushka, K. Meaning and identities: a visual performative pedagogy for socio-cultural learning. Curriculum Journal, 20, 3, (2009), 237--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Deakin Crick, R., Grushka, K., Heitmeyer, D. and Nicholson, M. Learning, Place and Identity: An exploration of the affordances of a pedagogy of place amongst Indignous Australian students. University of Bristol, Bristol, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. R., D. C., Jelfs, H., Huang, S. and Wang, Q. Learning Futures Final Report. Paul Hamlyn Foundation, London, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Goodson, I. and Deakin Crick, R. Curriculum as narration: tales from the children of the colonised. Curriculum Journal, 20, 3, (2009), 225--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Students, W. I. Taronga Zoo Break Out. Singleton High School Ka Wul Centre, Singleton, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Deakin Crick, R., McCombs, B. and Haddon, A. The Ecology of Learning: Factors Contributing to Learner Centred Classroom Cultures. Research Papers in Education, 22, 3, (2007), 267--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Deakin Crick, R., Haigney, D., Huang, S., Coburn, T. and Goldspink, C. Learning Power in the Work Place: The Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory (ELLI) and its Reliability, Validity and Implications for Learning and Development. Submitted to: International Journal of Human Resource Management, (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Ferguson, R., Buckingham Shum, S. and Deakin Crick, R. EnquiryBlogger -- Using widgets to Support Awareness and Reflection in a PLE Setting. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in PLEs, Personal Learning Environments Conference (Southampton, 11 July, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Ullmann, T. D., Ferguson, R., Buckingham Shum, S. and Deakin Crick, R. Designing an Online Mentoring System for Self- Awareness and Reflection on Lifelong Learning Skills. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in PLEs, Personal Learning Environments Conference (Southampton, 11 July, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Learning dispositions and transferable competencies: pedagogy, modelling and learning analytics

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader