skip to main content
10.1145/2370216.2370246acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The french kitchen: task-based learning in an instrumented kitchen

Published:05 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ubiquitous computing technologies have traditionally striven to augment objects and the environment with sensing capabilities to enable them to respond appropriately to the needs of the individuals in the environment. This paper considers how such technologies might be harnessed to support language learning, and specifically Task-Based Learning (TBL). Task-Based Learning (TBL) involves doing meaningful tasks in a foreign language, emphasising the language's use in practice. TBL is seen as a highly engaging and motivating approach to learning a language, but is difficult to do in the classroom. Here, learners typically engage in activities that only simulate 'real-world' tasks, and as such only rehearse language use, rather than applying the language in practice. In this paper, we explore how an instrumented, context-aware environment whose design is grounded in pedagogical principles can support TBL. We present the French Kitchen, an instrumented kitchen for English speakers who are learning French, and describe a 46-participant evaluation of the kitchen. Based on the evaluation, we provide a set of design recommendations for those building instrumented systems for TBL.

References

  1. Abowd, G. D. 1999. Classroom 2000: An Experiment with the Instrumentation of a Living Educational Environment. IBM Systems Journal -- Special Issue on Pervasive Computing. 38, 4 (1999), 508--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Akbar, F. S. 2011. CALL for SLA: Does its Benefits Outweigh its Costs? Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics. 11, 2 (2011), 15--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonanni, L. et al. 2005. CounterIntelligence: Augmented Reality Kitchen. Proc. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2005), 2239--2245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambers, A. and Bax, S. 2006. Making CALL work: Towards normalisation. System. 34, 4 (Dec. 2006), 465--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Communities, E. 2008. Languages mean business: Companies work better with languages. Recommendations from the Business Forum for Multilingualism established by the European Commission. Recommendations from the Business Forum for Multilingualism established by the European Comm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies, G. 2005. Computer Assisted Language Learning: Where are we now and where are we going? Keynote speech at the University of Ulster Centre for Research in Applied Languages UCALL conference: "Developing a pedagogy for CALL" (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimitrova, V. 2003. STyLE-OLM?: Interactive Open Learner Modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 13, (2003), 35--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fox, J. 1984. Computer-assisted vocabulary learning. ELT Journal. 38, 1 (1984), 27--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Halloran, J. et al. 2006. The literacy fieldtrip. Proceeding of the 2006 conference on Interaction design and children - IDC '06 (New York, New York, USA, Jun. 2006), 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoey, J. et al. 2011. Rapid specification and automated generation of prompting systems to assist people with dementia. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kranz, M. et al. 2007. Context-aware kitchen utilities. Proc. Int. Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction (2007), 213--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Laufer, B. 2001. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: the construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics. 22, 1 (Mar. 2001), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Macaro, E. 2008. The decline in language learning in England: getting the facts right and getting real. Language Learning Journal. 36, 1 (Jun. 2008), 101--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Motteram, G and Thomas, Michael (2010) Afterword: Future directions for technology-mediated tasks. In: Task-based language learning and teaching with technology. Contiuum, London, pp. 218--238. ISBN 978-1441101532Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ogata, A. H. et al. 2004. Computer supported ubiquitous learning environment for vocabulary learning using RFID tags. Technology Enhanced Learning. 171, 1 (2004), 121--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ogata, H. et al. 2004. TANGO?: Supporting Vocabulary Learning with RFID tags. Proc. Int. Workshop Series on RFID. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Olivier, P. et al. 2009. Ambient Kitchen: Designing Situated Services using a High Fidelity Prototyping Environment. Workshop on Affect & Behaviour Related Assistance in the Support of the Elderly, PETRA-09. (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Open Movement - WAX3 Wireless Accelerometers: http://code.google.com/p/openmovement/wiki/WAX3. Accessed: 2012-03-16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pham, C. and Olivier, P. 2009. Slice&Dice: Recognizing Food Preparation Activities Using Embedded Accelerometers. AmI (2009), 34--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pham, C. et al. 2010. A Dynamic Time Warping Approach To Real-Time Activity Recognition for Food Preparation. Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Ambient Intelligence (Malaga, 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rogers, Y. et al. 2004. Ambient wood. Proceeding of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children building a community - IDC '04 (New York, New York, USA, Jun. 2004), 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ryokai, K., Oehlberg, L., Manoochehri, M., and Agogino, A. 2011. GreenHat: exploring the natural environment through experts' perspectives. Proc. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2011) 2149--2152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Seedhouse, P. 2004. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective (Language Learning Monograph). Wiley-Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Seedhouse, P. P. et al. 2010. Conceptualising "Learning" in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Skehan, P. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Warschauer, M. 1996. Computer Assisted Language Learning: An Introduction (web version, from www.ict4lt.org). Multimedia language teaching. S. Fotos, ed. Logos International. 3--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Willis, J. 1996. A Framework for Task-based Learning (Longman Handbooks for Language Teaching). Longman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The french kitchen: task-based learning in an instrumented kitchen

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UbiComp '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
        September 2012
        1268 pages
        ISBN:9781450312240
        DOI:10.1145/2370216

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 September 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        UbiComp '12 Paper Acceptance Rate58of301submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader