skip to main content
research-article

Inferring who-is-who in the Twitter social network

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 September 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this paper, we design and evaluate a novel who-is-who service for inferring attributes that characterize individual Twitter users. Our methodology exploits the Lists feature, which allows a user to group other users who tend to tweet on a topic that is of interest to her, and follow their collective tweets. Our key insight is that the List meta-data (names and descriptions) provides valuable semantic cues about who the users included in the Lists are, including their topics of expertise and how they are perceived by the public. Thus, we can infer a user's expertise by analyzing the meta-data of crowdsourced Lists that contain the user. We show that our methodology can accurately and comprehensively infer attributes of millions of Twitter users, including a vast majority of Twitter's influential users (based on ranking metrics like number of followers). Our work provides a foundation for building better search and recommendation services on Twitter.

References

  1. Americans for Democratic Action. www.adaction.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Bernstein, D. Tan, G. Smith, M. Czerwinski, and E. Horvitz. Collabio: a game for annotating people within social networks. In ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. S. Bernstein, B. Suh, L. Hong, J. Chen, S. Kairam, and E. H. Chi. Eddi: interactive topic-based browsing of social status streams. In ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. P. Gummadi. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Dill et al. Semtag and seeker: bootstrapping the semantic web via automated semantic annotation. In ACM Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In WebKDD and SNA-KDD workshop on Web mining and Social Network Analysis, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. Kallen. Twitter blog: Soon to Launch: Lists. http://tinyurl.com/lists-launch, Sep 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Kim, Y. Jo, I.-C. Moon, and A. Oh. Analysis of Twitter Lists as a Potential Source for Discovering Latent Characteristics of Users. In ACM CHI Workshop on Microblogging, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lada Adamic -- University of Michigan. www.ladamic.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Michelson and S. A. Macskassy. Discovering users' topics of interest on Twitter: a first look. In Workshop on Analytics for Noisy unstructured text Data (AND), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Pal and S. Counts. Identifying topical authorities in microblogs. In ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Pochampally and V. Varma. User context as a source of topic retrieval in Twitter. In Workshop on Enriching Information Retrieval (with ACM SIGIR), Jul 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Ramage, S. Dumais, and D. Liebling. Characterizing Microblogs with Topic Models. In AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Twitter: Who to Follow. twitter.com/who_to_follow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Twitter Improves "Who To Follow" Results & Gains Advanced Search Page. http://selnd.com/wtfdesc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. J. Welch, U. Schonfeld, D. He, and J. Cho. Topical semantics of Twitter links. In ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Wu, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Who says what to whom on Twitter. In ACM Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. X. Wu, L. Zhang, and Y. Yu. Exploring social annotations for the semantic web. In ACM Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Inferring who-is-who in the Twitter social network

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
          ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 42, Issue 4
          Special october issue SIGCOMM '12
          October 2012
          538 pages
          ISSN:0146-4833
          DOI:10.1145/2377677
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2012 Authors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 September 2012

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader