skip to main content
10.1145/2381416.2381428acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Support for modeling interaction with automotive user interfaces

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

During the last decade, the number of functions of automotive user interfaces has increased rapidly. Besides traditional controls to drive a car, driver assistance, infotainment, entertainment, and comfort systems need to be controlled while driving. This does not only affect the driver's cognitive workload but also leads to increased complexity in designing automotive user interfaces. In this paper, we provide models and tools for rapid prototyping and the evaluation of user interfaces in this context. Usually, functional prototypes of user interfaces are implemented that allow the usability and quality to be assessed with time-consuming user studies. In contrast, in our approach we use an adapted Keystroke-Level Model (KLM) that is based on empirically collected data for typical operations in the car. It takes into account the aspect of attention switching in the car between primary tasks and other tasks. We present KLM operator times that we determined in a user study as well as a formula for estimating the task completion time. The presented model is the foundation for the MI-AUI prototyping tool that we implemented for permitting the creation of automotive interfaces using tangible controls. By demonstrating a typical operation with the MI-AUI prototype, the estimated task completion time can be calculated. MI-AUI is an evaluation tool that can be quickly and easily applied in early stages of the design process without the need to involve real drivers.

References

  1. Bullinger, H. J., Dangelmaier, M.: Virtual prototyping and testing of in-vehicle interfaces. In Ergonomics, 46 (2003), 41--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Burnett, G. E, Designing and evaluating in-car user interfaces. In J. Lumsden (Ed.) Handbook of Research on User-Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology, Idea Group Inc. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Card, S. K, Moran, T. P., Newell, A.: The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. In: Communications of the ACM, 23 (1980), 396--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., Newell, A.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ: The psychology of human-computer interaction, CRC 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Döring, T., Kern, D., Marshall, P., Pfeiffer, M., Schöning, J., Gruhn, V., Schmidt, A.: Gestural interaction on the steering wheel: reducing the visual demand. In Proc. CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 483--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dunlop, M. D., Montgomery Masters, M.: Investigating five key predictive text entry with combined distance and keystroke modelling. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12 (2008), 589--598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fitts, P. M.: The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement. In Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 (1954), 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Green, P.: Estimating compliance with the 15-second rule for driver-interface usability and safety. In Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society '99, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Green, P.: Variations in task performance between younger and older drivers: Umtri research on telematics. In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Conference on Aging and Driving, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenberg, S., Fitchett, C.: Phidgets: easy development of physical interfaces through physical widgets. In Proc. UIST '01. ACM Press (2001), 209--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hartmann, B., Klemmer, S. R., Bernstein, M., Abdulla, L., Burr, B., Robinson-Mosher, A., Gee, J.: Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis. In Proc. UIST '06. ACM Press (2006), 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Holleis, P.: Integrating Usability Models into Pervasive Application Development. PhD Thesis, 2008, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Holleis, P., Otto, F., Hussmann, H, Schmidt, A.: Keystroke-level model for advanced mobile phone interaction. In: Proc. CHI '07, ACM Press (2007), 1505--1514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Holleis, P., Schmidt, A.: MakeIt: Integrate User Interaction Times in the Design Process of Mobile Applications. In Proc. Pervasive '08. Springer-Verlag (2008), 56--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hudson, S. E., Mankoff, J.: Rapid construction of functioning physical interfaces from cardboard, thumbtacks, tin foil and masking tape. In Proc. UIST '06, ACM Press (2006), 289--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. International Standards Organization, ISO 16673 Road Vehicle -- Ergonomic Aspects of Transport Information and Control Systems-Occlusion Method to Assess Visual Demand Due to the Use of In-Vehicle Systems, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. John, B. E., Prevas, K., Salvucci, D. D., Koedinger, K.: Predictive human performance modeling made easy. In: Proc. CHI '04, ACM Press (2004), 455--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kern, D., Marshall, P., Schmidt, A.: Gazemarks: gaze-based visual placeholders to ease attention switching. In Proc. CHI '10. ACM Press (2010), 2093--2102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kern, D., Schmidt, A.: Design space for driver-based automotive user interfaces. In Proc. AutoUI '09, ACM Press (2009), 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kranz, M., Holleis, P., Schmidt, A.: Embedded Interaction: Interacting with the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Computing 14, 2 (March-April 2010), 46--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Manes, D., Green, P., Hunter, D: Prediction of destination entry and retrieval times using the keystroke-level model. Tech. Rep. UMTRI-96-37, University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI), 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pettitt, M. A., Burnett, G. E., Bayer, S., Stevens, A.: Assessment of the occlusion technique as a means for evaluating the distraction potential of driver support systems. IEE Proc. In-tell. Trans. Syst. 153 (4), 2006, 259--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Pettitt, M., Burnett, G., Karbassioun, D.: Applying the keystroke level model in a driving context. In: Proc. Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting '06, Taylor & Francis (2006), 219--223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pettitt, M., Burnett, G., Stevens, A.: An extended keystroke level model (KLM) for predicting the visual demand of in-vehicle information systems. In Proc. CHI '07, ACM Press (2007), 1515--1524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Salvucci, D., Zuber, M., Beregovaia, E., Markley, D.: Distract-R: rapid prototyping and evaluation of in-vehicle interfaces. In Proc. CHI '05, ACM Press (2005), 581--589. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE Recommended Practice: Navigation and Route Guidance Function Accessibility While Driving (SAE J2364), Tech. report SAE J2364, Feb. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE Recommended Practice: Calculation of the Time to Complete In-Vehicle Navigation and Route Guidance Tasks (SAE J2365), Tech. report SAE J2365, May 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Stanton, N. A., Young, M. S.: Giving ergonomics away? The application of ergonomics methods by novices. In: Applied Ergonomics, 34 (2003), 479--490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Urbas, L., Leuchter, S.: Usability engineering of "In Vehicle Information Systems" with multi-tasking GOMS. In: Proceedings Dachkongress Patientensicherheit und Medizintechnik. APS 2008--3. Jahrestagung des Aktionsböndnis Patientensicherheit e.V. und MEK 2008--5. Medizintechnik und Ergonomie Kongress. VDE (2008), CD-ROM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Villar, N., Gellersen, H.: A malleable control structure for softwired user interfaces. In Proc. TEI '07. ACM Press (2007), 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Support for modeling interaction with automotive user interfaces

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            AutomotiveUI '11: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
            November 2011
            190 pages
            ISBN:9781450312318
            DOI:10.1145/2381416

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 30 November 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader