skip to main content
research-article

Physical Activity Motivating Games: Be Active and Get Your Own Reward

Published:01 December 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

People’s daily lives have become increasingly sedentary, with extended periods of time being spent in front of a host of electronic screens for learning, work, and entertainment. We present research into the use of an adaptive persuasive technology, which introduces bursts of physical activity into a traditionally sedentary activity: computer game playing. Our game design approach leverages the playfulness and addictive nature of computer games to motivate players to engage in mild physical activity. The design allows players to gain virtual in-game rewards in return for performing real physical activity captured by sensory devices. This article presents a two-stage analysis of the activity-motivating game design approach applied to a prototype game. Initially, we detail the overall acceptance of active games discovered when trialing the technology with 135 young players. Results showed that players performed more activity without negatively affecting their perceived enjoyment of the playing experience. The analysis did discover, however, a lack of balance between the amounts of physical activity carried out by players with various gaming skills, which prompted a subsequent investigation into adaptive techniques for balancing the amount of physical activity performed by players. An evaluation of additional 90 players showed that adaptive techniques successfully overcame the gaming skills dependence and achieved more balanced activity levels. Overall, this work positions activity-motivating games as an approach that can potentially change the way players interact with computer games and lead to healthier lifestyles.

References

  1. Anderson, I., Maitland, J., Sherwood, S., Barkhuus, L., Chalmers, M., Hall, M., Brown, B., and Muller, H. 2007. Shakra: Tracking and sharing daily activity levels with unaugmented mobile phones. Mob. Netw. Appl. 12, 2--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Andre, D. and Wolf, D. L. 2007. Recent advances in free-living physical activity monitoring: A review. J. Diabetes Sci. Techn. 1, 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Berkovsky, S., Coombe, M., and Helmer, R. 2010a. Activity interface for physical activity motivating games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Berkovsky, S., Coombe, M., Freyne, J., Bhandari, D., and Baghaei, N. 2010b. Physical activity motivating games: Virtual rewards for real activity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J., Coombe, M., and Bhandari, D. 2010c. Recommender algorithms in activity motivating games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recommender Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J., and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2012. Influencing individually: Fusing personalization and persuasion. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bogost, I. 2007. Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Buchman, D. D. and Funk, J. B. 1996. Video and computer games in the ’90s: Children’s time commitment and game preference. Children Today 24, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Buttussi, F., Chittaro, L., Ranon, R., and Verona, A. 2007. Adaptation of graphics and gameplay in fitness games by exploiting motion and physiological sensors. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Smart Graphics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Campbell, T., Ngo, B., and Fogarty, J. 2008. Game design principles in everyday fitness applications, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Conati, C. and MacLaren, H. 2006. Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 19, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., and Landay, J. A. 2006. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Consolvo, S., McDonald, D. W., et al. 2008. Activity sensing in the wild: A field trial of UbiFit Garden. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Consolvo, S., McDonald, D. W., and Landay, J. A. 2009. Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Daley, A. J. 2009. Can exergaming contribute to improving physical activity levels and health outcomes in children? Pediatrics, 14, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fogg, B. J. 2003. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Frank, A. 2007. Balancing three different foci in the design of serious games: Engagement, training objective and context. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Digital Games Research Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fujiki, Y., Kazakos, K., Puri, C., Buddharahu, P., Pavlidis, I., and Levine, J. 2008. NEAT-o-Games: Blending physical activity and fun in the daily routine. Comput. Entertain. 6, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Giumetti, G. W. and Markey, P. M. 2007. Violent video games and anger as predictors of aggression. J. Resear. Personality 41, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Helmer, R. J. N., Mestrovic, M. A., Farrow, D., Lucas, S., and Spratford, W. 2008. Smart textiles: Position and motion sensing for sport, entertainment and rehabilitation. Adv. Sci. Techn. 60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A., and Riedl, J. 1999. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hsu, C. L. and Lu, H. P. 2004. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inf. Manage. 41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Koezuka, N., Koo, M., Allison, K. R., Adlaf, E. M., Dwyer, J. J. M., Faulkner, G., and Goodman, J. 2006. The relationship between sedentary activities and physical inactivity among canadian adolescents: Results from the Canadian Community Health Survey. J. Adolescent Health 39, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lin, J. J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., and Strub, H. B. 2006. Fish’n’Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Masuko, S. and Hoshino, J. 2006. A fitness game reflecting heart rate. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mueller, F. and Agamanolis, S. 2008. Exertion interfaces. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mueller, F., Edge, D., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Agamanolis, S., Bongers, B., and Sheridan, J. G. 2011. Designing sports: A framework for exertion games. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Nawyn, J., Intille, S. S., and Larson, K. 2006. Embedding behavior modification strategies into a consumer electronic device: A case study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Premack, D. 1959. Toward empirical behavioral laws: Positive reinforcement. Psych. Rev. 66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Siewiorek, D., Samailagic, A., and Starner, T. 2008. Application Design for Wearable Computing. Morgan and Claypool Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Shani, G., Meisles, A., Gleyzer, Y., Rokach, L., and Ben-Shimon, D. 2007. A stereotypes-based hybrid recommender system for media items. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Skinner, B. F. 1938. The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Stach, T. and Graham, T. C. N. 2011. Exploring haptic feedback in exergames. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Sweetser, P. and Wyeth, P. 2005. GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Tapia, E. M., Intille, S. S., and Larson, K. 2004. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Thue, D., Bultiko, V., Spetch, M., and Wasylishen, E. 2007. Interactive storytelling: A player modelling approach. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence for Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Toscos, T., Faber, A., An, S., and Gandhi, M. P. 2006. Chick clique: Persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Tychsen, A., Tosca, S., and Brolund, T. 2006. Personalizing the player experience in MMORPG. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Valanou, E. M., Bamia, C., and Trichopoulou, A. 2006. Methodology of physical-activity and energy-expenditure assessment: A review. J. Public Health 14, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Vandewater, E. A., Shim, M. S., and Caplovitz, A. G. 2004. Linking obesity and activity level with children’s television and video game use. J. Adolescence 27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang, Y. J., Wang, J. S., and Chen, Y. P. 2008. Using acceleration measurements for activity recognition: An effective learning algorithm for constructing neural classifiers. Patt. Recognition Lett. 29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Zhu, W. 2007. Promoting physical activity through internet: A persuasive technology view. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Physical Activity Motivating Games: Be Active and Get Your Own Reward

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
        ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 19, Issue 4
        December 2012
        236 pages
        ISSN:1073-0516
        EISSN:1557-7325
        DOI:10.1145/2395131
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 December 2012
        • Accepted: 1 July 2012
        • Revised: 1 December 2011
        • Received: 1 January 2011
        Published in tochi Volume 19, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader