skip to main content
10.1145/2463372.2463524acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Search for a grand tour of the jupiter galilean moons

Published:06 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We make use of self-adaptation in a Differential Evolution algorithm and of the asynchronous island model to design a complex interplanetary trajectory touring the Galilean Jupiter moons (Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto) using the multiple gravity assist technique. Such a problem was recently the subject of an international competition organized by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA) and won by a trajectory designed by aerospace experts and reaching the final score of 311/324. We apply our method to the very same problem finding new surprising designs and orbital strategies and a score of up to 316/324.

References

  1. B. Addis, A. Cassioli, M. Locatelli, and F. Schoen. A global optimization method for the design of space trajectories. Computational Optimization and Applications, 48(3):635--652, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. H. Battin. An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, revised edition, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Brest, V. Zumer, and M. S. Maucec. Self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm in constrained real-parameter optimization. In IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2006, pages 215--222. IEEE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Corana, M. Marchesi, C. Martini, and S. Ridella. Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the "simulated annealing" algorithm Corrigenda for this article is available here. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 13(3):262--280, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. Deb, N. Padhye, and G. Neema. Interplanetary trajectory optimization with swing-bys using evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In L. Kang, Y. Liu, and S. Zeng, editors, Advances in Computation and Intelligence, volume 4683 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 26--35. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Hansen, S. D. Müller, and P. Koumoutsakos. Reducing the time complexity of the derandomized evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (CMA-ES). Evolutionary Computation, 11(1):1--18, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Izzo. 1st ACT global trajectory optimisation competition: Problem description and summary of the results. Acta Astronautica, 61(9):731--734, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. Izzo. Global Optimization and Space Pruning for Spacecraft Trajectory Design. In B. Conway, editor, Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization, Cambridge Aerospace Series, chapter 7, pages 178--201. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Izzo, V. M. Becerra, D. R. Myatt, S. J. Nasuto, and J. M. Bishop. Search space pruning and global optimisation of multiple gravity assist spacecraft trajectories. Journal of Global Optimization, 38(2):283--296, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Liu, H. Baoyin, and X. Ma. Five special types of orbits around Mars. Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 33(4):1294--1301, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. E. Lynam, K. W. Kloster, and J. M. Longuski. Multiple-satellite-aided capture trajectories at Jupiter using the Laplace resonance. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 109(1):59--84, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. E. Petropoulos. Problem description for the 6th global trajectory optimisation competition. http://goo.gl/FmrOc. Accessed: 01/01/2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Rosa Sentinella and L. Casalino. Cooperative evolutionary algorithm for space trajectory optimization. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 105(1{3):211--227, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Vasile and M. Locatelli. A hybrid multiagent approach for global trajectory optimization. Journal of Global Optimization, 44(4):461--479, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. H. Yam, D. Izzo, and F. Biscani. Towards a high fidelity direct transcription method for optimisation of low-thrust trajectories. In 4th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and Techniques, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Search for a grand tour of the jupiter galilean moons

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '13: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
          July 2013
          1672 pages
          ISBN:9781450319638
          DOI:10.1145/2463372
          • Editor:
          • Christian Blum,
          • General Chair:
          • Enrique Alba

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 July 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          GECCO '13 Paper Acceptance Rate204of570submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader