ABSTRACT
Notwithstanding their widespread diffusion, stereoscopic media have important drawbacks in terms of viewers' visual discomfort. Current assessment methods are mainly based on measures of objective parameters such as eye physiology or media characteristics. On the other hand, subjective methods only evaluate the personal experience related to the physiological symptoms. In this pilot study we developed and validated the Stereoscopic Discomfort Scale (SDS), a self-assessment tool for the subjective evaluation of physiological and psychological symptoms related to stereoscopic viewing. The results show evidence of internal consistency, unidimensionality and construct validity of the scale. Since SDS scores were also strongly correlated with facets of presence, we argue that the SDS could be a useful tool for the investigation of users' experience related to stereoscopic media.
- N.S. Holliman, N.A. Dodgson, G.E. Favalora, L. Pockett, Three-dimensional displays: a review and applications analysis, IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 57 (2) (2011) 362--371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.T.M. Lambooij, W.A. IJsselsteijn, M. Fortuin, I. Heynderickx, Visual discomfort and visual fatigue in stereoscopic displays: a review, J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 43 (3) (2009) 1--14.Google Scholar
- M.T.M. Lambooij, W.A. IJsselsteijn, I. Heynderickx, Visual discomfort: assessment methods and modeling, Displays 32 (2010) 209--218.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.T.M. Lambooij, W.A. IJsselsteijn, M. Fortuin, B.J.W. Evans, I. Heynderickx, Measuring visual discomfort associated with 3-D displays, J. Soc. Inf. Displays, 18 (2010) 931--943.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Lambooij, W.A. Ijsselsteijn, M. Fortuin, B.J.W. Evans, I. Heynderickx, Susceptibility to visual discomfort of 3-D displays by visual performance measures, IEEE Trans. Circuit Syst. Video Technol. 21 (12) (2011) 1913--1923.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F.L. Kooi, A. Toet, Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays, Displays, 25 (2004), 99--108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Recommendation ITU-R BT.500--11, Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, Question ITU-R 211/11.Google Scholar
- J.E. Sheedy, J. Hayes, J. Engle, Is all asthenopia the same?, Optom Vis. Sci. 80 (2003) 732--739.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Nojiri, H. Yamanoue, A. Hanazato, and F. Okano, Measurement of parallax distribution and its application to the analysis of visual comfort for stereoscopic HDTV, in Proc. Stereoscopic Displays Virtual Reality Syst. X, 2003, vol. 5006.Google Scholar
- S. Yang, T. Schlieski, S. Cooper, R. Doherty, P.J. Corriveau, J.E. Sheedy, Individual Differences and Seating Position Affect Immersion and Symptoms in Stereoscopic 3D Viewing, Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 89, NO.7, 2012.Google Scholar
- P. J. H. Seuntiens, Visual Experience of 3D TV, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2006.Google Scholar
- Advanced Television Systems Committee, Final Report of The ATSC Planning Team on 3D- TV Doc. PT1-049r1, 31 august 2011Google Scholar
- T. Shibata, J. Kim, D. M. Hoffman, M. S. Banks, The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays, Journal of Vision, 11 (8), 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.G. Solimini, A. Mannocci, D. Di Thiene. A pilot application of a questionnaire to evaluate visually induced motion sickness in spectators of tri-dimensional (3D) movies, Italian Journal of Public Health, 8, 197206, 2011.Google Scholar
- Blazhenkova, O. & Kozhevnikov, M. (2009). The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 638--663.Google Scholar
- Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268--277.Google Scholar
- Marks, D.F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17--24.Google Scholar
- J. Lessiter, J. Freeman, E. Keogh, J. Davidoff, "A cross-media Presence questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory", Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10, pp. 282--298, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Investigating visual discomfort with 3D displays: the stereoscopic discomfort scale
Recommendations
Reducing visual discomfort of 3D stereoscopic displays with gaze-contingent depth-of-field
SAP '14: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied PerceptionWe report on an experiment testing gaze-contingent depth-of-field (DOF) for the reduction of visual discomfort when viewing stereoscopic displays. Subjective results are compelling, showing, we believe for the first time, that gaze-contingent depth-of-...
Eye movements and visual discomfort when viewing stereoscopic 3D content
AbstractThe visual brain fuses the left and right images projected onto the two eyes from a stereoscopic 3D (S3D) display, perceives parallax, and rebuilds a sense of depth. In this process, the eyes adjust vergence and accommodation to adapt ...
Visual discomfort prediction on stereoscopic 3D images without explicit disparities
Almost all existing 3D visual discomfort prediction models are based, at least in part, on features that are extracted from computed disparity maps. These include such estimated quantities such as the maximum disparity, disparity range, disparity energy ...
Comments