skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2481348acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digital portraits: photo-sharing after domestic violence

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores how technology could support the re-building of lives after domestic violence. We worked in the context of a women's centre where women are accessing support after leaving abusive relationships. The paper contributes a feminist participatory arts action research approach to studying photo-sharing practices and helps to frame an understanding of the ongoing tensions in the construction of self with others that the women experience. We argue that the affirmation of new bonds, control in sharing the process of 'moving on', and supporting discursive negotiations of privacy are important considerations for design focused on interpersonal social processes around the use of digital technology.

References

  1. Abrahams, H. Rebuilding Lives after Domestic Violence. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardzell, S. & Bardzell, J. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism and HCI. In Proc. CHI'11, ACM Press (2011), 675--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Becker, G. Disrupted Lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. University of California Press, CA, US, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Boehner, K. et al. How HCI interprets the probes. In Proc. CHI 07, ACM Press (2007), 1077--1086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chaplin, R., Flatley, J. and Smith, K. (eds.) Crime in England and Wales 2010/11: British Crime Survey Home Office Statistical Bulletin 10/11. London, UK, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, R., Wright, P. & McCarthy, J. Sharing narrative and experience: digital stories and portraits in a women's centre. Ext Abstracts CHI'12, ACM Press (2012), 1505--1510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Coetzee, A., Dabrowska, A., Hockton, P., Fairey, T. Change the Picture: Photography with Vulnerable Women. PhotoVoice Report, London, UK, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Conde, Z. J. et al. GuardDV: a proximity detection device for homeless survivors of domestic violence. Ext Abstacts CHI'08, ACM Press (2008), 3855--3860. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Connelly, M. & Clandinin, J. Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry. Educational Researcher 19 (5) American Educational Research Association, US (1990), 2--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimond, J. Fiesler, C. & Bruckman, A. S. Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (2011), 413--421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Durrant, A. et al. Home curation versus teenage photography: Photo displays in the family home. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67, 12 (2009), 1005--1023. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Frohmann, L. The Framing Safety Project: Photographs and Narrative by Battered Women. Violence Against Women 11 (11) (2005), 1396--1419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Frohlich, D. et al. Requirements for Photoware. In Proc CSCW'02, ACM Press (2002) 166--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gatenby, B., & Humphries, M. Feminist participatory action research: methodological and ethical issues. Women's Studies International Forum 23 (1) (2000), 89--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gaver, B., Dunne, T. & Pacenti, E. Cultural Probes. Interactions, Jan/Feb 1999, 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Greene, K. D. et al. Self-Disclosure in Personal Relationships. Vangelisti, A. (Ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. Cambridge University Press, UK, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison, B., Photographic Visions and Narrative Inquiry. Narrative Inquiry 12(1) (2002), 87--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hayes, G. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 3 (15) (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. House of Commons, Home Affairs Committee. Domestic Violence, Forced Marriage and "Honour"- Based Violence. Sixth Report of Session 2007-08, London, UK, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Le Dantec, C., & Edwards, W. K. Designs on dignity: perceptions of technology among the homeless. In Proc. CHI '08. ACM Press (2008), 627--636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Le Dantec, C. Participation and publics: supporting community engagement. In Proc. CHI '12. ACM Press (2012), 1351--1360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lennie, J., Hatcher, C. & Morgan, W. Feminist discourses of (dis)empowerment in an action research project involving rural women and communication technologies. Action Research 1 (1) (2003), 57--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lindley, S., Durrant, A., Kirk, D. & Taylor, A. 2009. Editorial: Collocated social practices surrounding photos. Int. J. Hum.Comput. Stud. 67, 12 (2009), 995--1004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Massimi, M., Dimond, J. P. & Le Dantec, C. 2012. Finding a new normal: the role of technology in life disruptions. In Proc. CSCW '12, ACM Press (2009), 719--728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Massimi, M. & Baecker, R. M. Dealing with death in design: developing systems for the bereaved. In Proc. CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 1001--1010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. McCarthy, J. & Wright, P. Technology as Experience MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Palen, L., & Dourish, P. Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world. In Proc. CHI'03, ACM Press (2003), 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Perry, J. Digital Stalking: A guide to technology risks for victims. Network for Surviving Stalking & Women's Aid, Bristol, UK, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sambasivan, N., Weber, J., & Cutrell, E. 2011. Designing a phone broadcasting system for urban sex workers in India. In Proc. CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 267--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Southworth, C., Finn, J., Dawson, S., Fraser, C. & Tucker, S. Intimate Partner Violence, Technology, and Stalking. Violence Against Women 13 (8) (2007), 842--856.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Spence, J. Cultural Sniping: The Art of Transgression. Routledge, London, UK, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, N. & Cheverst. K. Social interaction around a rural community photo display. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67, 12 (2009), 1037--1047. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Turner, V. & Bruner, E. The Anthropology of Experience. University of Illinois Press, US, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. United Nations for Gender Equality, Handbook for National Action Plans on Violence Against Women. UN Women, New York, US, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Van House, N. Collocated photo sharing, storytelling, and the performance of self. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67 (2009) 1073--1086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wiles, R., Coffey, A., Robison, J., Heath, S. Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, 'voice' and protection. Int. J. Social Science Res. Methodology 15 (1) (2011), 41--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Wright, P. & McCarthy, J. Experience-centred Design: Designers, Users and Communities in Dialogue. Morgan & Claypool. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Digital portraits: photo-sharing after domestic violence

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader