ABSTRACT
User review is a crucial component of open mobile app markets such as the Google Play Store. How do we automatically summarize millions of user reviews and make sense out of them? Unfortunately, beyond simple summaries such as histograms of user ratings, there are few analytic tools that can provide insights into user reviews. In this paper, we propose Wiscom, a system that can analyze tens of millions user ratings and comments in mobile app markets at three different levels of detail. Our system is able to (a) discover inconsistencies in reviews; (b) identify reasons why users like or dislike a given app, and provide an interactive, zoomable view of how users' reviews evolve over time; and (c) provide valuable insights into the entire app market, identifying users' major concerns and preferences of different types of apps. Results using our techniques are reported on a 32GB dataset consisting of over 13 million user reviews of 171,493 Android apps in the Google Play Store. We discuss how the techniques presented herein can be deployed to help a mobile app market operator such as Google as well as individual app developers and end-users.
- Google play has 700,000 apps, tying apple's app store, http://news.yahoo.com/google-play-700-000-apps-tying-apples-app-172110918.html.Google Scholar
- Most popular android market categories, http://www.appbrain.com/stats/android-market-app-categories.Google Scholar
- An open-source api for the android market, http://code.google.com/p/android-market-api/.Google Scholar
- N. Archak, A. Ghose, and P. G. Ipeirotis. Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Science, 57(8):1485--1509, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. M. Blei and J. D. Lafferty. Dynamic topic models. In ICML, pages 113--120, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3:993--1022, 2003. Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Chahuneau, K. Gimpel, B. R. Routledge, L. Scherlis, and N. A. Smith. Word salad: Relating food prices and descriptions. In EMNLP-CoNLL, pages 1357--1367, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Ding, B. Liu, and P. S. Yu. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In WSDM, pages 231--240, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Frank, B. Dong, A. P. Felt, and D. Song. Mining permission request patterns from android and facebook applications. ICDM, 0:870--875, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. H. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(1):1--22, 2 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Ghose and P. Ipeirotis. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. TKDE, 23(10):1498--1512, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Hong and B. D. Davison. Empirical study of topic modeling in twitter. In SOMA, pages 80--88, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Hu and B. Liu. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In KDD, pages 168--177, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Jindal and B. Liu. Opinion spam and analysis. In WSDM, pages 219--230, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Joshi, D. Das, K. Gimpel, and N. A. Smith. Movie reviews and revenues: an experiment in text regression. In HLT, pages 293--296, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Li, M. Huang, Y. Yang, and X. Zhu. Learning to identify review spam. In IJCAI, pages 2488--2493, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Lin, Y. He, C. Pedrinaci, and J. Domingue. Feature lda: A supervised topic model for automatic detection of web api documentations from the web. In ISWC, pages 328--343. 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. M. Mimno and A. McCallum. Topic models conditioned on arbitrary features with dirichlet-multinomial regression. In UAI, pages 411--418, 2008.Google Scholar
- A. Mukherjee and B. Liu. Modeling review comments. In ACL, pages 320--329, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Mukherjee, B. Liu, and N. Glance. Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews. In WWW, pages 191--200, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Wang, S. Xie, B. Liu, and P. Yu. Review graph based online store review spammer detection. In ICDM, pages 1242--1247, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Xie, G. Wang, S. Lin, and P. S. Yu. Review spam detection via temporal pattern discovery. In KDD, pages 823--831, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Why people hate your app: making sense of user feedback in a mobile app store
Recommendations
ARdoc: app reviews development oriented classifier
FSE 2016: Proceedings of the 2016 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software EngineeringGoogle Play, Apple App Store and Windows Phone Store are well known distribution platforms where users can download mobile apps, rate them and write review comments about the apps they are using. Previous research studies demonstrated that these ...
A preliminary analysis of mobile app user reviews
OzCHI '12: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction ConferenceThe advent of online software distribution channels like Apple Inc.'s App Store and Google Inc.'s Google Play has offered developers a single, low cost, and powerful distribution mechanism. These online stores help users discover apps as well as leave a ...
Revenue models, in-app purchase, and the app performance
The effect of revenue models on app performance depends on the app store.The effect of in-app purchase on app performance depends on the app store.Paid, freemium and in-purchase models are shown to be effective in app store.Freemium and in-app purchase ...
Comments