skip to main content
research-article

Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A game-theoretic approach based on coalition formation

Published:23 July 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A coalitional game theoretic scheme is proposed that aims at maximizing wireless sensor network lifetime under specified QoS. Employing a small number of nodes of increased computing power and lifetime called representatives, an adaptive clustering scheme is proposed where neighboring nodes form coalitions in order to increase energy efficiency at the cost of controllable data-accuracy reduction. The coalition formation is globally optimized by the representatives. The spatial correlation of the sensed phenomenon measurements is exploited to formulate a cooperation scheme that reduces drastically the number of node transmissions. The specifications regarding the accuracy of the collected data determine the extent of coalition formation. The efficiency and stability of the proposed coalitional scheme are studied through simulations.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. 2002. Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Comput. Netw. 38, 393--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Apt, K. R. and Witzel, A. 2006. A generic approach to coalition formation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Social Choice (COMSOC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aumann, R. and Drèze, J. 1974. Cooperative games with coalition structures. Int. J. Game Theory 3, 217--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, G., Li, C., Ye, M., and Wu, J. 2009. An unequal cluster-based routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 15, 2, 193--207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cristescu, R., Beferull-Lozano, B., and Vetterli, M. 2004. On network correlated data gathering. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM'04). 2571--2582.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng, X. and Papadimitriou, C. H. 1994. On the complexity of cooperative solution concepts. Math. Oper. Res. 19, 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gehrke, J. and Madden, S. 2004. Query processing in sensor networks. IEEE Perv. Comput. 3, 1, 46--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Goel, S. and Imielinski, T. 2001. Prediction-based monitoring in sensor networks: Taking lessons from mpeg. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 31, 82--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Greco, G., Malizia, E., Palopoli, L., and Scarcello, F. 2010. Non-transferable utility coalitional games via mixed-integer linear constraints. J. Artif. Int. Res. 38, 1, 633--685. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., and Balakrishnan, H. 2002. An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 1, 4, 660--670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hu, H., Ma, X., Tang, S., Chen, G., and Zhao, Q. 2009. MCC: Model-based continuous clustering in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. 265--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jindal, A. and Psounis, K. 2006. Modeling spatially correlated data in sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 2, 466--499. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Krishnamachari, B., Wicker, S., and Bejar, R. 2001. Phase transition phenomena in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM'01). Vol. 5. 2921--2925.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Madden, S., Franklin, M. J., Hellerstein, J. M., and Hong, W. 2002. TAG: A tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 36, 131--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Marsh, D., Tynan, R., O'Kane, D., and O'Hare, G. M. P. 2004. Autonomic wireless sensor networks. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 17, 7, 741--748. Autonomic Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Meka, A. and Singh, A. 2006. Distributed spatial clustering in sensor networks. In Advances in Database Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, vol. 3896. Springer, Berlin, 980--1000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Moulin, H. 2003. Game Theory and Economic Analysis: A Quiet Revolution in Economics. Rontledge, London, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Osborne, M. J. and Rubinstein, A. 1994. A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pattem, S., Krishnamachari, B., and Govindan, R. 2008. The impact of spatial correlation on routing with compression in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 4, 1--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rahwan, T., Michalak, T., Elkind, E., Faliszewski, P., Sroka, J., Wooldridge, M., and Jennings, N. 2011. Constrained coalition formation. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). 719--725.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramchurn, S. D., Polukarov, M., Farinelli, A., Truong, C., and Jennings, N. R. 2010. Coalition formation with spatial and temporal constraints. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'10). Vol. 3. 1181--1188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ray, D. 2008. A Game-Theoretic Perspective on Coalition Formation. Oxford University Press. Oxford, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Saad, W., Han, Z., Debbah, M., Hjorungnes, A., and Basar, T. 2009. Coalitional game theory for communication networks. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 26, 5, 77--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sandholm, T., Larson, K., Andersson, M., Shehory, O., and Tohmé, F. 1999. Coalition structure generation with worst case guarantees. Artif. Intell. 111, 1--2, 209--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Savvides, A., Han, C.-C., and Strivastava, M. B. 2001. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'01). ACM, New York, NY, 166--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Soro, S. and Heinzelman, W. 2005. Prolonging the lifetime of wireless sensor networks via unequal clustering. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Subramanian, R., Pishro-Nik, H., and Fekri, F. 2005. Clustering-based correlation aware data aggregation for distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM'05).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. van den Brink, R. 2007. Null or nullifying players: The difference between the shapley value and equal division solutions. J. Econ. Theory 136, 1, 767--775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Virrankoski, R. and Savvides, A. 2005. TASC: Topology adaptive spatial clustering for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Vuran, M. C. and Akyildiz, I. F. 2006. Spatial correlation-based collaborative medium access control in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 14, 316--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yoon, S. and Shahabi, C. 2007. The clustered aggregation (cag) technique leveraging spatial and temporal correlations in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Youssef, M., Youssef, A., and Younis, M. 2009. Overlapping multihop clustering for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 20, 12, 1844--1856. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zhu, Q. 2008. A trade-off study between efficiency and fairness in communication networks. In Proceedings of the INFOCOM Workshops. IEEE, 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A game-theoretic approach based on coalition formation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 9, Issue 4
      July 2013
      523 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/2489253
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 July 2013
      • Accepted: 1 September 2012
      • Revised: 1 January 2012
      • Received: 1 June 2011
      Published in tosn Volume 9, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader