skip to main content
research-article

Effective and Robust Query-Based Stemming

Published:01 November 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Stemming is a widely used technique in information retrieval systems to address the vocabulary mismatch problem arising out of morphological phenomena. The major shortcoming of the commonly used stemmers is that they accept the morphological variants of the query words without considering their thematic coherence with the given query, which leads to poor performance. Moreover, for many queries, such approaches also produce retrieval performance that is poorer than no stemming, thereby degrading the robustness. The main goal of this article is to present corpus-based fully automatic stemming algorithms which address these issues. A set of experiments on six TREC collections and three other non-English collections containing news and web documents shows that the proposed query-based stemming algorithms consistently and significantly outperform four state of the art strong stemmers of completely varying principles. Our experiments also confirm that the robustness of the proposed query-based stemming algorithms are remarkably better than the existing strong baselines.

References

  1. Bacchin, M., Ferro, N., and Melucci, M. 2005. A probabilistic model for stemmer generation. Inf. Process. Manage. 41, 1, 121--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baroni, M., Matiasek, J., and Trost, H. 2002. Unsupervised discovery of morphologically related words based on orthographic and semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning (MPL’02). Vol. 6, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 48--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Church, K. W. and Hanks, P. 1990. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Comput. Linguist. 16, 1, 22--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Collins-Thompson, K. and Callan, J. 2007. Estimation and use of uncertainty in pseudo-relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’07). ACM, New York, NY, 303--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dolamic, L. and Savoy, J. 2009. Indexing and stemming approaches for the Czech language. Inf. Process. Manage. 45, 6, 714--720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dolamic, L. and Savoy, J. 2010. Comparative study of indexing and search strategies for the Hindi, Marathi, and Bengali languages. ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process. 9, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Goldsmith, J. 2001. Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Comput. Linguist. 27, 2, 153--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hammarstrom, H. 2009. Unsupervised learning of morphology and the languages of the world. Ph.D. thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Harman, D. 1991. How effective is suffixing. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42, 7--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Krovetz, R. 1993. Viewing morphology as an inference process. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’93). ACM, New York, 191--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lovins, J. 1968. Development of a stemming algorithm. Mech. Tran. Comput. Linguistics, 22--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Majumder, P., Mitra, M., Parui, S. K., Kole, G., Mitra, P., and Datta, K. 2007. YASS: Yet another suffix stripper. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 25, 4, 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Manning, C. D. and Schütze, H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mayfield, J. and McNamee, P. 2003. Single n-gram stemming. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’03). ACM, New York, 415--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. McNamee, P., Nicholas, C. K., and Mayfield, J. 2009. Addressing morphological variation in alphabetic languages. In Proceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 75--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Oard, D. W., Levow, G.-A., and Cabezas, C. I. 2000. CLEF experiments at Maryland: Statistical stemming and backoff translation. In Proceedings of the Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF’00). 176--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Paik, J. H. and Parui, S. K. 2011. A fast corpus-based stemmer. ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process. 10, 2, 8:1--8:16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Paik, J. H., Mitra, M., Parui, S. K., and Järvelin, K. 2011a. GRAS: An effective and efficient stemming algorithm for information retrieval. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 29, 19:1--19:24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Paik, J. H., Pal, D., and Parui, S. K. 2011b. A novel corpus-based stemming algorithm using co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’11). ACM, New York, 863--872. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Peng, F., Ahmed, N., Li, X., and Lu, Y. 2007. Context sensitive stemming for web search. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’07). ACM, New York, 639--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Porter, M. F. 1997. An algorithm for suffix stripping. In Readings in Information Retrieval, 313--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sakai, T., Manabe, T., and Koyama, M. 2005. Flexible pseudo-relevance feedback via selective sampling. ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process. 4, 111--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Savoy, J. 2006. Light stemming approaches for the French, Portuguese, German and Hungarian languages. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’06). ACM, New York, 1031--1035. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Smucker, M. D., Allan, J., and Carterette, B. 2007. A comparison of statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’07). ACM, New York, 623--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Snyder, B. and Barzilay, R. 2008. Unsupervised multilingual learning for morphological segmentation. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Voorhees, E. M. 2003. Overview of the trec 2003 robust retrieval track. In Proceedings of TREC. 69--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Voorhees, E. M. 2005. The trec robust retrieval track. SIGIR Forum 39, 1, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Xu, J. and Croft, W. B. 1998. Corpus-based stemming using cooccurrence of word variants. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 16, 1, 61--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Xu, J. and Croft, W. B. 2000. Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 18, 79--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Zhao, L. and Callan, J. 2010. Term necessity prediction. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’10). ACM, New York, 259--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Effective and Robust Query-Based Stemming

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
          ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 31, Issue 4
          November 2013
          192 pages
          ISSN:1046-8188
          EISSN:1558-2868
          DOI:10.1145/2536736
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 November 2013
          • Accepted: 1 April 2013
          • Revised: 1 March 2013
          • Received: 1 February 2012
          Published in tois Volume 31, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader