skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557359acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Science studies scholar Bruno Latour suggests that contemporary democracy is shifting from "matters of fact"to "matters of concern": contentious conditions entwined with everyday life. What is the role of human-computer interaction (HCI) design in this shift' In this paper we draw from five design projects to explore how design can express matters of concern by communicating the factors and consequences of issues. In the process, we consider the role of design in contributing to the formation of publics and discuss an emerging orientation to publics in HCI design.

References

  1. Baumer, E. and M. Six Silberman. When the implication is not to design (technology). In Proc CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 2271--2274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beck, U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage, London, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Binder, T., De Michelis, G., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., Wagner, I. Design Things, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., and P. A. Hillgren. Participatory Design and "Democratizing Innovation". In Proc PDC 2010. ACM Press (2010), 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dewey, J. The Public and its Problems. Swallow Press, Chicago, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. DiSalvo, C. Design and the Construction of Publics. Design Issues 25, 1 (2009), 48--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. DiSalvo, C. Adversarial Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dourish, P., Finlay, J., Sengers, P., and P Wright. Reflective HCI: towards a critical technical practice. CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2004), 1727--1728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dunne, A. and Raby, F. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhäuser, Berlin, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunne, A. Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ehn, P. Participation in design things. In Proc. PDC 2008, ACM Press (2008), 92--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fallman, D. Design-oriented Human-Computer Interaction. In Proc CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 225--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Feld, R. 'John Dewey,' Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. July 14, 2005. (Accessed Sept 17, 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaver, G. 2012. What should we expect from research through design' In Proc CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012). AC Press, 937--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kim, T. and C. DiSalvo. Speculative Visualization: A New Rhetoric for Communicating Public Concerns. In Proc DRS 2010, Design Research Society (2010), n.p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuznetsov, S. and E. Paulos, Participatory Sensing in Public Spaces: Activating Urban Surfaces with Sensor Probes. Proc DIS 2010, ACM Press (2010), 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Latour, B. "From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik." In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, Weibel, P. and B. Latour, eds. MIT Press: Cambridge MA (2005), 14--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lausen, Marcia. Design for democracy: Ballot and election design. University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Le Dantec, C. 2012. Participation and Publics: Supporting Community Engagement. In Proc CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1351--1360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Le Dantec, C. A., J. E. Christensen, M. Bailey, R. G. Farrell, J. B. Ellis, C. M. Danis, W. A. Kellogg, and W. K. Edwards. A tale of Two Publics: Democratizing design at the margins. In Proc DIS 2010, ACM Press (2010), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lindtner, S., and D. Li. "Created in China: The Makings of China's Hackerspace Community." interactions 19.6 (2012): 18--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lindtner, S., J. Chen, G. R. Hayes, and P. Dourish. 2011. Towards a Framework of Publics: ReEncountering Media sharing and its User. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 2, Article 5 (July 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Marres, N. Material participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, A. and M. Lynch, M. (2009). Counting things and people: The practices and politics of counting. Social Problems, 56(2): 243--266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Munson, S. and P. Resnick. 2010. Presenting Diverse Political Opinions: How and How much. In Proc CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1457--1466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Olander, S., Lenskjold, T., Yndigegn, S., and M. Foverskov. 2011. Mobilizing for Community Building and Everyday Innovation. interactions 18, 4: 28--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Paulos, E. 2013. The Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Culture and the Evolution of Computer Science. SIGPLAN Not. 48, 4 (March 2013): 153--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., and 'Jofish' Kaye, Reflective Design. In Proc 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing ACM Press (2005), 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Seravalli, A. 2012. Infrastructuring for opening production, from participatory design to participatory making' In Proc PDC 2012, ACM Press (2102), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tanenbaum, J., Williams, A. Desjardins, A. and K. Tanenbaum. Democratizing Technology: Pleasure, Utility and Expressiveness in DIY and Maker Practice. In Proc CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013) 2603--2612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wang, T. and J. 'Jofish' Kaye. 2011. Inventive leisure practices: understanding hacking communities as sites of sharing and innovation. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts, ACM Press (2011), 263--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Warner, M. Publics and Counterpublics. Zone Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Weibel, P. and B. Latour, eds. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. 2007. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design esearch in HCI. In Proc CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader