skip to main content
10.1145/2556325.2566247acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs

Published:04 March 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The current generation of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) attract a diverse student audience from all age groups and over 196 countries around the world. Researchers, educators, and the general public have recently become interested in how the learning experience in MOOCs differs from that in traditional courses. A major component of the learning experience is how students navigate through course content.

This paper presents an empirical study of how students navigate through MOOCs, and is, to our knowledge, the first to investigate how navigation strategies differ by demographics such as age and country of origin. We performed data analysis on the activities of 140,546 students in four edX MOOCs and found that certificate earners skip on average 22% of the course content, that they frequently employ non-linear navigation by jumping backward to earlier lecture sequences, and that older students and those from countries with lower student-teacher ratios are more comprehensive and non-linear when navigating through the course.

From these findings, we suggest design recommendations such as for MOOC platforms to develop more detailed forms of certification that incentivize students to deeply engage with the content rather than just doing the minimum necessary to earn a passing grade. Finally, to enable other researchers to reproduce and build upon our findings, we have made our data set and analysis scripts publicly available.

References

  1. MaxMind GeoIP databases and web services. http://www.maxmind.com/en/geolocation_landing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, T. What's Right and What's Wrong About Coursera-style MOOCs?, 2012. Blog entry retrieved from http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-and-whats-wrong-about-coursera-\\style-moocs/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., and Seaton, D. T. Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom: Research into edX's First MOOC. Research and Practice in Assessment 8 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, S. Y., and Ford, N. J. Modelling User Navigation Behaviours in a Hypermedia-based Learning System : An Individual Differences Approach. Knowledge organization 25, 3 (1998), 67--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng, Y. W., Sudweeks, F., Cheng, Y. W., and Sudweeks, F. A Longitudinal Study on the Effect of Hypermedia on Learning Dimensions, Culture and Teaching Evaluation. In Proc. Cultural Attitudes Towards Technology and Communication (2012), 146--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarà, M., and Barberà, E. Learning Online: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), Connectivism, and Cultural Psychology. Distance Education 34, 1 (2013), 129--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Coetzee, D., Fox, A., Hearst, M. A., and Hartmann, B. Should Your MOOC Forum Use a Reputation System? In Proc. CSCW'14, ACM (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Truluck, Bradley C. Courtenay, J. Learning Style Preferences Among Older Adults. Educational Gerontology 25, 3 (1999), 221--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ford, N., and Chen, S. Y. Matching/Mismatching Revisited: An Empirical Study of Learning and Teaching Styles. British Journal of Educational Technology 32, 1 (2001), 5--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Grünewald, F., Meinel, C., Totschnig, M., and Willems, C. Designing MOOCs for the Support of Multiple Learning Styles. In Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact. Springer, 2013, 371--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofstede, G. Cultural Differences in Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 10 (1986), 301--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kennedy, P. Learning Cultures and Learning Styles: Myth-understandings about Adult (Hong Kong) Chinese Learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education 21, 5 (2002), 430--445.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kizilcec, R. F. Collaborative Learning in Geographically Distributed and In-person Groups. In AIED 2013 Workshop on Massive Open Online Courses (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., and Schneider, E. Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. In Proc. Learning Analytics and Knowledge, ACM (2013), 170--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lee, C., Sudweeks, F., and Cheng, Y. The Role of Unit Evaluation, Learning and Culture Dimensions Related to Students Cognitive Style in Hypermedia Learning. In Proc. Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, M. W., Y., C. S., Chrysostomou, K., and Liu, X. Mining Students' Behavior in Web-based Learning Programs. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 2 (2009), 3459--3464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Liegle, J. O., and Janicki, T. N. The Effect of Learning Styles on the Navigation Needs of Web-based Learners. Computers in Human Behavior 22, 5 (2006), 885--898.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. McLoughlin, C. E. The Pedagogy of Personalised Learning: Exemplars, MOOCS and Related Learning Theories. In Proc. EdMedia (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., and Margaryan, A. Patterns of Engagement in Connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 9, 2 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Naidu, S. Learning About Learning and Teaching Online. Distance Education 34, 1 (2013), 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pask, G. Styles and Strategies of Learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 2 (1976), 128--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Reed, W., and Oughton, J. Computer Experience and Interval-based Hypermedia Navigation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 30 (1997), 38--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Pupil-teacher ratio, primary. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.ENRL.TC.ZS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., and Goodenough, D. R. Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research 47, 1 (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      L@S '14: Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference
      March 2014
      234 pages
      ISBN:9781450326698
      DOI:10.1145/2556325

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 March 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      L@S '14 Paper Acceptance Rate14of38submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%

      Upcoming Conference

      L@S '24
      Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
      July 18 - 20, 2024
      Atlanta , GA , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader