skip to main content
10.1145/2567948.2577034acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

AIDR: artificial intelligence for disaster response

Published:07 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present AIDR (Artificial Intelligence for Disaster Response), a platform designed to perform automatic classification of crisis-related microblog communications. AIDR enables humans and machines to work together to apply human intelligence to large-scale data at high speed. The objective of AIDR is to classify messages that people post during disasters into a set of user-defined categories of information (e.g., "needs", "damage", etc.) For this purpose, the system continuously ingests data from Twitter, processes it (i.e., using machine learning classification techniques) and leverages human-participation (through crowdsourcing) in real-time. AIDR has been successfully tested to classify informative vs. non-informative tweets posted during the 2013 Pakistan Earthquake. Overall, we achieved a classification quality (measured using AUC) of 80%. AIDR is available at http://aidr.qcri.org/.

References

  1. S. R. Chowdhury, M. Imran, M. R. Asghar, S. Amer-Yahia, and C. Castillo. Tweet4act: Using incident-specific profiles for classifying crisis-related messages. In Proc. of ISCRAM, Baden-Baden, Germany, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Imran, C. Castillo, J. Lucas, M. Patrick, and J. Rogstadius. Coordinating human and machine intelligence to classify microblog communications in crises. Proc. of ISCRAM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Imran, S. Elbassuoni, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and P. Meier. Practical extraction of disaster-relevant information from social media. In Proc. of Workshop on Social Media Data for Disaster Management, WWW '13 Companion, pages 1021--1024. ACM/IW3C2, 20 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Imran, S. M. Elbassuoni, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and P. Meier. Extracting information nuggets from disaster-related messages in social media. In Proc. of ISCRAM, Baden-Baden, Germany, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Imran, I. Lykourentzou, and C. Castillo. Engineering crowdsourced stream processing systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.5463, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Li, J. Weng, Q. He, Y. Yao, A. Datta, A. Sun, and B.-S. Lee. Twiner: named entity recognition in targeted twitter stream. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 721--730. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Turaga, H. Andrade, B. Gedik, C. Venkatramani, O. Verscheure, J. D. Harris, J. Cox, W. Szewczyk, and P. Jones. Design principles for developing stream processing applications. Software: Practice and Experience, 40(12):1073--1104, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Vieweg. Microblogged contributions to the emergency arena: Discovery, interpretation and implications. In Proc. of CSCW, February 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. E. Vieweg. Situational awareness in mass emergency: A behavioral and linguistic analysis of microblogged communications. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. AIDR: artificial intelligence for disaster response

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web
        April 2014
        1396 pages
        ISBN:9781450327459
        DOI:10.1145/2567948

        Copyright © 2014 Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • demonstration

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader