Christian Peters
Jesse Hoey
Abstract
People with cognitive disabilities such as dementia and intellectual disabilities tend to have problems in coordinating steps in the execution of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) due to limited capabilities in cognitive functioning. To successfully perform ADLs, these people are reliant on the assistance of human caregivers. This leads to a decrease of independence for care recipients and imposes a high burden on caregivers. Assistive Technology for Cognition (ATC) aims to compensate for decreased cognitive functions. ATC systems provide automatic assistance in task execution by delivering appropriate prompts which enable the user to perform ADLs without any assistance of a human caregiver. This leads to an increase of the user’s independence and to a relief of caregiver’s burden. In this article, we describe the design, development and evaluation of a novel ATC system. The TEBRA (TEeth BRushing Assistance) system supports people with moderate cognitive disabilities in the execution of brushing teeth. A main requirement for the acceptance of ATC systems is context awareness: explicit feedback from the user is not necessary to provide appropriate assistance. Furthermore, an ATC system needs to handle spatial and temporal variance in the execution of behaviors such as different movement characteristics and different velocities. The TEBRA system handles spatial variance in a behavior recognition component based on a Bayesian network classifier. A dynamic timing model deals with temporal variance by adapting to different velocities of users during a trial. We evaluate a fully functioning prototype of the TEBRA system in a study with people with cognitive disabilities. The main aim of the study is to analyze the technical performance of the system and the user’s behavior in the interaction with the system with regard to the main hypothesis: is the TEBRA system able to increase the user’s independence in the execution of brushing teeth?
- Bevans, M. F. and Sternberg, E. M. 2012. Caregiving burden, stress, and health effects among family care-givers of adult cancer patients. JAMA 307, 4, 398--403.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Demchak, M. A. 1990. Response prompting and fading methods: A review. Amer. J. Mental Retard. 94, 6, 603--615.Google Scholar
- Gillespie, A., Best, C., and O’Neill, B. 2011. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: A systematic review. J. Int. Neuropsych. Soc. 18, 1, 1--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gould, J. D. and Lewis, C. 1985. Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Commun. ACM 28, 3, 300--311. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hoey, J., Poupart, P., von Bertoldi, A., Craig, T., Boutilier, C., and Mihailidis, A. 2010. Automated handwashing assistance for persons with dementia using video and a partially observable Markov decision process. Comput. Vis. Image Understand. 114, 5, 503--519. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hoey, J., Plötz, T., Jackson, D., Monk, A., Pham, C., and Olivier, P. 2011. Rapid specification and automated generation of prompting systems to assist people with dementia. Perv. Mobile Comput. 7, 3, 299--318. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Intille, S. S., Bao, L., Tapia, E. M., and Rondoni, J. 2004. Acquiring in situ training data for context-aware ubiquitous computing applications. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 1--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kluger, A., Gianutsos, J. G., Golomb, J., Ferris, S. H., George, A. E., Franssen, E., and Reisberg, B. 1997. Patterns of motor impairment in normal aging, mild cognitive decline, and early Alzheimer’ disease. J. Geront. Series B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 52, 1, 28--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leroy, G. 2011. Designing User Studies in Informatics. Springer.Google Scholar
- Levinson, R. 1997. The planning and execution assistant and trainer (PEAT). Head Trauma Rehab. 12, 2, 85--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- LoPresti, E. F., Mihailidis, A., and Kirsch, N. 2004. Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: State of the art. Neuropsych. Rehab. 14, 1--2, 5--39.Google Scholar
- Melonis, M., Mihailidis, A., Keyfitz, R., Grześ, M., Hoey, J., and Bodine, C. 2012. Empowering adults with cognitive disability through inclusion of non-linear context aware prompting technology (N-CAPS). In Proceedings of RESNA.Google Scholar
- Mihailidis, A., Boger, J., Craig, T., and Hoey, J. 2008. The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: An efficacy study. BMC Geriatrics (online) 8, 28.Google Scholar
- O’Neill, B. and Gillespie, A. 2008. Simulating naturalistic instruction: The case for a voice mediated interface for assistive technology for cognition. Assist. Technol. 2, 2, 22--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O’Neill, B., Moran, K., and Gillespie, A. 2010. Scaffolding rehabilitation behaviour using a voice-mediated assistive technology for cognition. Neuropsychol. Rehab. 20, 4, 509--527.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peters, C., Hermann, T., and Wachsmuth, S. 2011. Prototyping of an automatic prompting system for a residential home. In Proceedings of RESNA/ICTA.Google Scholar
- Peters, C., Hermann, T., and Wachsmuth, S. 2012. User behavior recognition for an automatic prompting system - A structured approach based on task analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods. 162--171.Google Scholar
- Peters, C., Hermann, T., and Wachsmuth, S. 2013. TEBRA---An automatic prompting system for persons with cognitive disabilities in brushing teeth. In Proceedings of the HealthInf International Conference on Health Informatics. 12--23.Google Scholar
- Pollack, M. E., Brown, L. E., Colbry, D., McCarthy, C. E., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., and Tsamardinos, I. 2003. Autominder: An intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment. Robotics Auton. Syst. 44, 3--4, 273--282.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richards, S. B., Taylor, R. L., Ramasamy, R., and Richards, R. 1998. Single Subject Research and Designs: Applications in Educational and Clinical Settings. Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Ryu, H. and Monk, A. 2009. Interaction unit analysis: A new interaction design framework. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 24, 4, 367--407.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scherer, M. J., Hart, T., Kirsch, N., and Schulthesis, M. 2005. Assistive technologies for cognitive disabilities. Crit. Rev. Phys. Rehab. Med. 17, 3, 195--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seelye, A. M., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Das, B., and Cook, D. J. 2012. Application of cognitive rehabilitation theory to the development of smart prompting technologies. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 5, 29--44.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Siepmann, F., Ziegler, L., Kortkamp, M., and Wachsmuth, S. 2012. Deploying a modeling framework for reusable robot behavior to enable informed strategies for domestic service robots. Robotics Auton. Syst. To appear.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Automatic Task Assistance for People with Cognitive Disabilities in Brushing Teeth - A User Study with the TEBRA System
Recommendations
Web accessibility for people with cognitive disabilities
CHI EA '05: CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis pilot study investigated individuals with developmental cognitive disabilities (DCD) navigating W3C accessibility-compliant Web sites and the impact of four cognitive determinants: situation awareness, spatial awareness, task-set switching, and ...
Designing cognitive technologies for people with disabilities - perspectives for theory and practice
This panel will identify and discuss practical and theoretical issues in the design, implementation, and evaluation of technologies to assist persons with developmental and acquired cognitive deficits.
Easy-to-web search for people with learning disabilities as part of an integrated concept of cognitive web accessibility
ICCHP'10: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computers helping people with special needs: Part IAccessible web for people with cognitive or learning disabilities doesn't only mean easy-to-read and font size magnification. Every interaction has to be reflected according to the needs of this target group. This paper describes the first step towards ...
Comments