skip to main content
10.1145/2600428.2609594acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting term-relevance from brain signals

Published:03 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Term-Relevance Prediction from Brain Signals (TRPB) is proposed to automatically detect relevance of text information directly from brain signals. An experiment with forty participants was conducted to record neural activity of participants while providing relevance judgments to text stimuli for a given topic. High-precision scientific equipment was used to quantify neural activity across 32 electroencephalography (EEG) channels. A classifier based on a multi-view EEG feature representation showed improvement up to 17% in relevance prediction based on brain signals alone. Relevance was also associated with brain activity with significant changes in certain brain areas. Consequently, TRPB is based on changes identified in specific brain areas and does not require user-specific training or calibration. Hence, relevance predictions can be conducted for unseen content and unseen participants. As an application of TRPB we demonstrate a high-precision variant of the classifier that constructs sets of relevant terms for a given unknown topic of interest. Our research shows that detecting relevance from brain signals is possible and allows the acquisition of relevance judgments without a need to observe any other user interaction. This suggests that TRPB could be used in combination or as an alternative for conventional implicit feedback signals, such as dwell time or click-through activity.

References

  1. I. Arapakis, K. Athanasakos, and J. M. Jose. A comparison of general vs personalised affective models for the prediction of topical relevance. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '10, pages 371--378, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. I. Arapakis, I. Konstas, and J. M. Jose. Using facial expressions and peripheral physiological signals as implicit indicators of topical relevance. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM '09, pages 461--470, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. Berger. Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 87(1):527--570, 1929.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. F. Crick and C. Koch. A framework for consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 6:119--126, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L. Farwell and E. Donchin. Talking off the top of your head: Toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 70(6):510--523, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. B. Figner and R. O. Murphy. Using Skin Conductance in Judgment and Decision Making Research. A Handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: A critical review and user's guide, pages 163--184, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. R. Folstein and C. Van Petten. In uence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45(1):152--170, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Gomez-Herrero, W. De Clercq, H. Anwar, O. Kara, K. Egiazarian, S. Van Huffel, and W. Van Paesschen. Automatic removal of ocular artifacts in the EEG without an EOG reference channel. In Signal Processing Symposium, 2006. NORSIG 2006. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic, pages 130--133, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Gönen. Bayesian efficient multiple kernel learning. In J. Langford and J. Pineau, editors, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-12) , pages 1--8, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. J. Gonsalvez and J. Polich. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology, 39(3):388--396, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Gretton, K. M. Borgwardt, M. J. Rasch, B. Schölkopf, and A. Smola. A kernel two-sample test. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13:723--773, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Gruber, M. M. Müller, and A. Keil. Modulation of induced gamma band responses in a perceptual learning task in the human EEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(5):732--744, July 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '05, pages 154--161, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Kelly and N. J. Belkin. Display time as implicit feedback: Understanding task effects. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'04, pages 377--384, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. W. Klimesch. EEG alpha and theta oscillations re ect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 29(2,3):169--195, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Koenemann and N. J. Belkin. A case for interaction: A study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '96, pages 205--212, New York, NY, USA, 1996. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Z. Koldovsky, P. Tichavsky, and E. Oja. Efficient variant of algorithm FastICA for independent component analysis attaining the Cram--er-Rao lower bound. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 17(5):1265--1277, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Lagioia, S. Eliez, M. Schneider, J. S. Simons, M. Van der Linden, and M. Debban. Neural correlates of reality monitoring during adolescence. NeuroImage, 55(3):1393--1400, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. F. Lotte, M. Congedo, A. L--ecuyer, F. Lamarche, and B. Arnaldi. A Review of Classification Algorithms for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces. Journal of Neural Engineering, 4(2), June 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. J. Luck. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique (Cognitive Neuroscience). MIT Press, 1 edition, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. J. McFarland, L. A. Miner, T. M. Vaughan, and J. R. Wolpaw. Mu and beta rhythm topographies during motor imagery and actual movements. Brain Topography, 12(3):177--186, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. P. Missonnier, M.-P. Deiber, G. Gold, P. Millet, M. Gex-Fabry Pun, L. Fazio-Costa, P. Giannakopoulos, and V. Ibãnez. Frontal theta event-related synchronization: Comparison of directed attention and working memory load effects. Journal of Neural Transmission, 113(10):1477--1486, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. T. M. Mitchell, S. V. Shinkareva, A. Carlson, K. M. Chang, V. L. Malave, R. A. Mason, and M. A. Just. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science, 320(4880):1191--1195, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Y. Moshfeghi and J. M. Jose. An effective implicit relevance feedback technique using affective, physiological and behavioural features. In\ Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval , SIGIR '13, pages 133--142, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Y. Moshfeghi, L. R. Pinto, F. E. Pollick, and J. M. Jose. Understanding Relevance: An fMRI Study. In P. Serdyukov, P. Braslavski, S. Kuznetsov, J. Kamps, S. Rüger, E. Agichtein, I. Segalovich, and E. Yilmaz, editors, Advances in Information Retrieval, volume 7814 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 14--25. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. T. E. Nichols and A. P. Holmes. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Human Brain Mapping, 15(1):1--25, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M. Pantic and L. J. M. Rothkrantz. Automatic analysis of facial expressions: The state of the art. IEEE Transactions in Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 22(12):1424--1445, Dec. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Pantic and L. J. M. Rothkrantz. Toward an affect-sensitive multimodal human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(9):1370--1390, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. R. D. Pascual-Marqui, C. M. Michel, and D. Lehmann. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18(1):49--65, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. J. Polich. Updating p300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10):2128--2148, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. A. T. Pope, E. H. Bogart, and D. S. Bartolome. Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task. Biological Psychology, 40(1--2):187--195, 1995. EEG in Basic and Applied Settings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. C. Ranganath, M. K. Johnson, and M. Desposito. Prefrontal activity associated with working memory and episodic long-term memory. Neuropsychologia, 41(3):378--389, 2003. Functional Neuroimaging of Memory.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. M. D. Rugg, P. C. Fletcher, C. D. Frith, R. S. J. Frackowiak, and R. J. Dolan. Differential activation of the prefrontal cortex in successful and unsuccessful memory retrieval. Brain, 119:2073--2083, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. T. Ruotsalo, J. Peltonen, M. Eugster, D. Glowacka, K. Konyushkova, K. Athukorala, I. Kosunen, A. Reijonen, P. Myllymáki, G. Jacucci, and S. Kaski. Directing exploratory search with interactive intent modeling. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information and knowledge management, CIKM '13, pages 1759--1764, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Y. Saeys, I. Inza, and P. Larra naga. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics, 23(19):2507--2517, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. T. Saracevic. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. part III: Behavior and effects of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13):2126--2144, Nov. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. S. Sonnenburg, G. Rátsch, C. Scháfer, and B. Schölkopf. Large scale multiple kernel learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1531--1565, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. M. M. Spap--e and D. J. Serrien. Interregional synchrony of visuomotor tracking: Perturbation effects and individual differences. Behavioural Brain Research, 213(2):313--318, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. C. Vidaurre and B. Blankertz. Towards a cure for BCI illiteracy. Brain Topography, 23(2):194--198, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. R. W. White and D. Kelly. A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '06, pages 297--306, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. J. R. Wolpaw, N. Birbaumer, D. J. McFarland, G. Pfurtscheller, and T. M. Vaughan. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. nClinical Neurophysiology, 113(6):767--791, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. J. X. Zhfang, H.-C. Leung, and M. K. Johnson. Frontal activations associated with accessing and evaluating information in working memory: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 20(3):1531--1539, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Predicting term-relevance from brain signals

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '14: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval
        July 2014
        1330 pages
        ISBN:9781450322577
        DOI:10.1145/2600428

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 July 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '14 Paper Acceptance Rate82of387submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader