skip to main content
10.1145/2609829.2609832acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CloudRidAR: a cloud-based architecture for mobile augmented reality

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile augmented reality (MAR) has exploded in popularity on mobile devices in various fields. However, building a MAR application from scratch on mobile devices is complicated and time-consuming. In this paper, we propose CloudRidAR, a framework for MAR developers to facilitate the development, deployment, and maintenance of MAR applications with little effort. Despite of advance in mobile devices as a computing platform, their performance for MAR applications is still very limited due to the poor computing capability of mobile devices. In order to alleviate the problem, our CloudRidAR is designed with cloud computing at the core. Computational intensive tasks are offloaded on cloud to accelerate computation in order to guarantee run-time performance. We also present two MAR applications built on CloudRidAR to evaluate our design.

References

  1. AndAR. https://code.google.com/p/andar/, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Billinghurst, M. Hakkarainen, and C. Wodward. Augmented assembly using a mobile phone. In Proceedings of MUM, pages 84--87, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Elmqvist, D. Axblom, and J. Claesson. 3dvn: A mixed reality platform for mobile navigation assistance. In Proc. CHI, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Freitas and P. Campos. Smart: a system of augmented reality for teaching 2nd grade students. In Proceedings of British Computer Society Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pages 27--30, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. J. Henderson and S. K. Feiner. Augmented reality in the psychomotor phase of a procedural task. In Proceedings of ISMAR, pages 191--200, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. W. Holden. http://www.juniperresearch.com/viewpressrelease.php pr=166, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. Holden. http://www.juniperresearch.com/viewpressrelease.php pr=232, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Hollerer, S. Feiner, and D. Hallaway. User interface management techniques for collaborative mobile augmented reality, computers and graphics. Modeling and Simulation Design, 25(5):799--810, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Z. P. Huang, P. Hui, C. Peylo, and D. Chatzopoulos. Mobile augmented reality survey: A bottom-up approach. Technical report, HKUST Technical Report, 2013 (cite as arXiv:1309.4413).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Irizarry, M. Gheisari, and G. Williams. Infospot: A mobile augmented reality method for accessing building information through a situation awareness approach. J. Autom. Constr., 33:11--23, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Julier, Y. Baillot, L. M, and D. Brown. Bars: Battlefield augmented reality system. In NATO Information Systems Technology Panel Symposium on New Information Processing Techniques for Military Systems, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Kato, M. Billinghurst, R. Blanding, and R. May. Artoolkit, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Kosta, A. Aucinas, and P. Hui. Thinkair: Dynamic resource allocation and parallel execution in cloud for mobile code offloading. In Proceedings of INFOCOM, pages 945--953, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Metaio. http://www.metaio.com/, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Mizen. Augmented reality applications in aerospace. In Proceedings of ISAR, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Nicklas and B. Mitschang. A model-based, open architecture for mobile, spatially aware applications. In Proceedings of Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases, pages 392--401, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. W. Piekarski and H. T. Bruce. An object-oriented software architecture for 3d mixed reality applications. In Proceedings of ISMAR, pages 247--256, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W. Piekarski and B. H. Thomas. Arquake: The outdoor augmented reality gaming system. Communications of the ACM, 45(1):36--38, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. G. Reitmayr and D. Schmalstieg. Collaborative augmented reality for outdoor navigation and information browsing. In Proceedings of ymposium Location Based Services and Tele Cartography, pages 53--62, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Schmalstieg, G. Schall, and D. Wagner. Managing complex augmented reality models. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 27(4):48--57, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Tonnis. Data management for augmented reality applications. Master's thesis, Technische Universitat Munchen, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. CloudRidAR: a cloud-based architecture for mobile augmented reality

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MARS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 workshop on Mobile augmented reality and robotic technology-based systems
      June 2014
      60 pages
      ISBN:9781450328234
      DOI:10.1145/2609829

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MARS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate6of7submissions,86%Overall Acceptance Rate6of7submissions,86%

      Upcoming Conference

      MOBISYS '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader