skip to main content
10.1145/2623330.2623373acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

'Beating the news' with EMBERS: forecasting civil unrest using open source indicators

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe the design, implementation, and evaluation of EMBERS, an automated, 24x7 continuous system for forecasting civil unrest across 10 countries of Latin America using open source indicators such as tweets, news sources, blogs, economic indicators, and other data sources. Unlike retrospective studies, EMBERS has been making forecasts into the future since Nov 2012 which have been (and continue to be) evaluated by an independent T&E team (MITRE). Of note, EMBERS has successfully forecast the June 2013 protests in Brazil and Feb 2014 violent protests in Venezuela. We outline the system architecture of EMBERS, individual models that leverage specific data sources, and a fusion and suppression engine that supports trading off specific evaluation criteria. EMBERS also provides an audit trail interface that enables the investigation of why specific predictions were made along with the data utilized for forecasting. Through numerous evaluations, we demonstrate the superiority of EMBERS over baserate methods and its capability to forecast significant societal happenings.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1799-sidebyside.mp4

mp4

277.7 MB

References

  1. R. Baeza-Yates. Searching the future. In SIGIR Workshop on Mathematical/Formal Methods in Information Retrieval, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. H. Becker, D. Iter, M. Naaman, and L. Gravano. Identifying content for planned events across social media sites. In WSDM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. M. Box-Steffensmeier and B. S. Jones. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge University press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Braha. Global civil unrest: contagion, self-organization, and prediction. PLoS One, 7(10), Jan. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. T. Brandt, J. R. Freeman, and P. A. Schrodt. Real time, time series forecasting of inter-and intra-state political conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 28(1), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Broecheler, L. Mihalkova, and L. Getoor. Probabilistic similarity logic. In UAI, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Dias, R. Campos, and A. Jorge. Future retrieval: What does the future talk about. In SIGIR Workshop on Enriching Information Retrieval, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. González-Bailón, J. Borge-Holthoefer, A. Rivero, and Y. Moreno. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep., 1, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Hua, C.-T. Lu, N. Ramakrishnan, F. Chen, J. Arredondo, D. Mares, and K. Summers. Analyzing Civil Unrest through Social Media. Computer, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. Kallus. Predicting crowd behavior with big public data. In WWW, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Leetaru and P. Schrodt. GDELT: Global data on events, location, and tone. ISA Annual Convention, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. H. Leetaru. Culturomics 2.0: Forecasting large-scale human behavior using global news media tone in time and space. First Monday, 16, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Llorens, L. Derczynski, R. J. Gaizauskas, and E. Saquete. TIMEN: An open temporal expression normalisation resource. In LREC, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. F. Malucelli, T. Ottmann, and D. Pretolani. Efficient labelling algorithms for the maximum noncrossing matching problem. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 47(2), 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. P. O'Brien. Crisis Early Warning and Decision Support: Contemporary Approaches and Thoughts on Future Research. Int. Stud. Rev., 12(1), Mar. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Ritter, O. Etzioni, and S. Clark. Open domain event extraction from twitter. In SIGKDD, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. P. A. Schrodt. Automated production of high-volume, near-real-time political event data. In American Political Science Association meetings, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Tibshirani. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 58, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Tops, A. van den Bosch, and F. Kunneman. Predicting time-to-event from twitter messages. In BNAIC, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. 'Beating the news' with EMBERS: forecasting civil unrest using open source indicators

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '14: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2014
      2028 pages
      ISBN:9781450329569
      DOI:10.1145/2623330

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 August 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '14 Paper Acceptance Rate151of1,036submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader