skip to main content
10.1145/2661829.2661983acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Graph-based Point-of-interest Recommendation with Geographical and Temporal Influences

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The availability of user check-in data in large volume from the rapid growing location-based social networks (LBSNs) enables a number of important location-aware services. Point-of-interest (POI) recommendation is one of such services, which is to recommend POIs that users have not visited before. It has been observed that: (i) users tend to visit nearby places, and (ii) users tend to visit different places in different time slots, and in the same time slot, users tend to periodically visit the same places. For example, users usually visit a restaurant during lunch hours, and visit a pub at night. In this paper, we focus on the problem of time-aware POI recommendation, which aims at recommending a list of POIs for a user to visit at a given time. To exploit both geographical and temporal influences in time aware POI recommendation, we propose the Geographical-Temporal influences Aware Graph (GTAG) to model check-in records, geographical influence and temporal influence. For effective and efficient recommendation based on GTAG, we develop a preference propagation algorithm named Breadth first Preference Propagation (BPP). The algorithm follows a relaxed breath-first search strategy, and returns recommendation results within at most 6 propagation steps. Our experimental results on two real-world datasets show that the proposed graph-based approach outperforms state-of-the-art POI recommendation methods substantially.

References

  1. D. Agarwal and B.-C. Chen. flda: matrix factorization through latent dirichlet allocation. In WSDM, pages 91--100, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Backstrom and J. Leskovec. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In WSDM, pages 635--644, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Baluja, R. Seth, D. Sivakumar, Y. Jing, J. Yagnik, S. Kumar, D. Ravichandran, and M. Aly. Video suggestion and discovery for youtube: taking random walks through the view graph. In WWW, pages 895--904, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Bao, Y. Zheng, and M. F. Mokbel. Location-based and preference-aware recommendation using sparse geo-social networking data. In SIGSPATIAL/GIS, pages 199--208, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Cheng, H. Yang, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Fused matrix factorization with geographical and social influence in location-based social networks. In AAAI, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee, K. Lee, and D. Z. Sui. Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services. In ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Cho, S. A. Myers, and J. Leskovec. Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks. In KDD, pages 1082--1090, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. Ding and X. Li. Time weight collaborative filtering. In CIKM, pages 485--492, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Ference, M. Ye, and W.-C. Lee. Location recommendation for out-of-town users in location-based social networks. In CIKM, pages 721--726, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H. Gao, J. Tang, X. Hu, and H. Liu. Exploring temporal effects for location recommendation on location-based social networks. In RecSys, pages 93--100, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Hu and M. Ester. Spatial topic modeling in online social media for location recommendation. In RecSys, pages 25--32, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Hu, M. Jamali, and M. Ester. Spatio-temporal topic modeling in mobile social media for location recommendation. In ICDM, pages 1073--1078, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. I. Konstas, V. Stathopoulos, and J. M. Jose. On social networks and collaborative recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 195--202, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In KDD, pages 447--456, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Koren, R. M. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Kurashima, T. Iwata, T. Hoshide, N. Takaya, and K. Fujimura. Geo topic model: joint modeling of user's activity area and interests for location recommendation. In WSDM, pages 375--384, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K. Lee, S. Hong, S. J. Kim, I. Rhee, and S. Chong. Slaw: A new mobility model for human walks. In INFOCOM, pages 855--863, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. J. Levandoski, M. Sarwat, A. Eldawy, and M. F. Mokbel. Lars: A location-aware recommender system. In ICDE, pages 450--461, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. Liu, Y. Fu, Z. Yao, and H. Xiong. Learning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation. In KDD, pages 1043--1051, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B. Liu and H. Xiong. Point-of-interest recommendation in location based social networks with topic and location awareness. In SDM, pages 396--404, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. N. N. Liu, L. He, and M. Zhao. Social temporal collaborative ranking for context aware movie recommendation. ACM TIST, 4(1):15, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. X. Liu, Y. Liu, K. Aberer, and C. Miao. Personalized point-of-interest recommendation by mining users' preference transition. In CIKM, pages 733--738, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Noulas, S. Scellato, N. Lathia, and C. Mascolo. A random walk around the city: New venue recommendation in location-based social networks. In SocialCom/PASSAT, pages 144--153, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW, pages 285--295, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. H. Wang, M. Terrovitis, and N. Mamoulis. Location recommendation in location-based social networks using user check-in data. In SIGSPATIAL/GIS, pages 364--373, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. L. Xiang, Q. Yuan, S. Zhao, L. Chen, X. Zhang, Q. Yang, and J. Sun. Temporal recommendation on graphs via long- and short-term preference fusion. In KDD, pages 723--732, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. L. Xiong, X. Chen, T.-K. Huang, J. G. Schneider, and J. G. Carbonell. Temporal collaborative filtering with bayesian probabilistic tensor factorization. In SDM, pages 211--222, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. M. Ye, X. Liu, and W.-C. Lee. Exploring social influence for recommendation: a generative model approach. In SIGIR, pages 671--680, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. Ye, P. Yin, and W.-C. Lee. Location recommendation for location-based social networks. In GIS, pages 458--461, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. M. Ye, P. Yin, W.-C. Lee, and D. L. Lee. Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 325--334, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. H. Yin, Y. Sun, B. Cui, Z. Hu, and L. Chen. Lcars: a location-content-aware recommender system. In KDD, pages 221--229, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Q. Yuan, G. Cong, Z. Ma, A. Sun, and N. Magnenat-Thalmann. Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 363--372, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. A. Zimdars, D. M. Chickering, and C. Meek. Using temporal data for making recommendations. In UAI, pages 580--588, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Graph-based Point-of-interest Recommendation with Geographical and Temporal Influences

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '14: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
        November 2014
        2152 pages
        ISBN:9781450325981
        DOI:10.1145/2661829

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CIKM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate175of838submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader